Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-16-2011, 09:48 AM | #581 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Citing opinions is no substitute for evidence.
Quote:
|
|
03-16-2011, 09:56 AM | #582 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
From Kohler (p. 420):
The best utterances of Jesus find their explanation in the Agadah. Take, for instance, the beautiful saying of Jesus: "Behold the birds of heaven! They sow not, neither do they reap, yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not of much more value than they? Behold the lilies of the field; they toil not, neither do they spin ; yet I say unto you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, shall He not much more clothe you, oh men of little faith." As soon as you compare it with an almost identical saying concerning the beasts and the birds in the Mishna, of the men that lack Emunah, 'faith,' and then take into consideration that the name of the purple lily in Palestine was 'the king's lily,' you recognize at once that that saying did not originate with one man, but with the whole class of Hasidim, whose chief teaching was trust in God, who gave the Manna as daily bread even in the wilderness, and not to give a thought to to-morrow's cares and troubles. The Midrash to Parshat ha-Man offers the key to this saying. |
03-16-2011, 10:28 AM | #583 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
"Come back when you have some...", (the room hushes in anticipation)... "some evidence." And the reaches of the room echoed, "evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence."
Quote:
|
|
03-16-2011, 10:48 AM | #584 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
The Gospels are most likely NOT eyewitness accounts. They are historically UNRELIABLE. And, the EARLIEST canonized version of gMatthew is from the 4th century. You ONLY know what is FOUND written, you DON'T know who actually said or wrote anything in the NT. |
|
03-16-2011, 11:05 AM | #585 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
The Gospels are literature, Jewish literature.
|
03-16-2011, 11:17 AM | #586 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
|
03-16-2011, 11:22 AM | #587 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
|
03-16-2011, 11:51 AM | #588 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
03-16-2011, 12:28 PM | #589 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-16-2011, 12:51 PM | #590 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Just to be clear, this is a quotation from spin, which I modified in my post to read:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Greek influence—and this means, first and foremost, the influence of Jewish Alexandrianism—is clearly discernible in the Epistle to the Hebrews, which used to be ascribed to Paul. His authorship, however, should quite certainly be rejected. It was probably written towards the end of the first century; even its language sets it apart from the rest of the New Testament, since it is composed in an educated Greek which reveals the influence of the language of Philo.Emphasis added. |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|