FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2005, 10:25 AM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amen-Moses
Oh right.

That would put a whole new angle on the "death of the innocents" bit wouldn't it!

Amen-Moses

Incidentally his first wife was Doris, was she from Manchester by any chance? :Cheeky:
No problem, the immensely huge, convaluted and inbreeding Herod Family, is enough to drive anyone insane trying to keep track of

The death of the innocents story would be a problem for the claim of Jesus being a child of Antipater, if Herod knew about him. It would mean that Herod did not think the child should rule or be part of his inheritance, ergo Pilate wouldn't consider such a child to have even a vague legitimate claim, and probably consider such a person to be a severe threat to peace. All that matter's is Herod's will and Augustus's execution of said will.

Herod's final will makes Archelaus King, and Herod Antipas and Herod Phillip Tetrarchs, though Augustus never allowed the title of King to be enforced for Archelaus, as the title did not just require Herod's will but also Augustus's
consent. Even in a previous will, Herod had designated Antipater as heir, but Herod Philip as heir if Antipater was to die first, and at this time Antipater had at least one son, so it is clear that Herod did not intend for Antipater's offspring to be heirs if Antipater was not.

The book seems to claim that Antipater was married to a Marianme, does anyone know where this comes from, as I don't think Josephus says anything about who his wives are by name, and only mentions one daughter, who was to be married to Aristobulus's(Antipater's executed half brother) eldest son and a son who was to be married to Aristobulus's daughter. This was changed before it happened, and Antipater himself married Aristobulus's daughter(though Josphus doesn't say which of the two he married) and his son married a daughter of Pheroras.

This means that Antipater had a wife and children before he married Aristobulus' daughter. One of Aristobulus's daughter was named Marainme(possibly, there is some confusion in Josephus on the names of Aristobulus's daughter's), but Josephus doesn't tell us if it was this one, at least that I can find.
yummyfur is offline  
Old 06-09-2005, 03:11 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,082
Default

My favourite theory is that mary was a dock worker :devil3:

A more likely idea is that Jesus's biological father, Frodo's biological father, and Scooby Doo's biological father are in fact all the same person.

(i.e. they're fictional characters, therefore they don't actually have biological fathers.)

Working out who Jesus's daddy "really" was first requires some evidence that Jesus existed in the first place - and until that shows up, the whole debate is, at best, nothing but suppositions built upon unfounded assumptions. (For example, debating the motivation of the wide scale murder of children would best be done with some evidence that this even occured, no? Maybe I'm wrong?)

Either that or he was an illegal immigrant from Mexico.
orac is offline  
Old 06-09-2005, 05:55 PM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default

Jesus was born two years before Herod the Great died in the Spring of 4 b.c. Jesus became a "One Year Old Child" in A.D. 6 which was the year of Augustus' census. When Jesus became a 12 year old Child in A.D. 17 Joseph (Cleophas) was still alive. Joseph was killed by Pilates soldiers during the re-routing of a stream the led to the "other Jerusalem" in A.D. 23.

offa
offa is offline  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:01 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tholzel
A new book claims to have positively identified the biological father of Jesus. Titled "The virgin Mary conspiracy: the true father of Christ and the tomb of the virgin," by Graham Philips, it claims Antipater, son of Herod was Jesus' father. What makes this claim so interesting is that Herod was the official rule of Paestine, i.e., the "King of the Jews." Then, as Herod's first-born son, Antipater would succeed him and after him, his first-born son Jesus.

Thus, when Jesus is asked by Pilate "Are you King of the Jews," and Jesus answers in the afirmative, he is not instantly sentenced to death but rather turned back to the Jews with the astonishing comment by Pilate that he finds in him no fault. How can that possbily be except that, under Roman law, Jesus is indeed in a direct line with Herod and Antipater, both dead?

This being the case, it means that Jesus was a blue-blood (and not a humble carpenter's son), and that he was trained to take over the job--most likely at the rigorous Essene community.(This precis is detailed further at: http://www.velocitypress.com/pages/Religion.php , Part 4. )

It also makes Jesus' conversion from a true hereditary King to a humble itinerant preacher all the more remarkable, and sheds a whole new light on his religious teachings. One major element: He does not preach poverty because he is poor; he preaches as a man from a wealthy family who has voluntarily gone poor.

Seems to me this new angle requires a complete rereading and reorientation of the Gospel stories, beginning, I would think with Robert Funk's book--The Acts of Jesus.
Hmm...Interesting concept...
Thomas II is offline  
Old 06-09-2005, 11:56 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orac
Working out who Jesus's daddy "really" was first requires some evidence that Jesus existed in the first place - and until that shows up, the whole debate is, at best, nothing but suppositions built upon unfounded assumptions. (For example, debating the motivation of the wide scale murder of children would best be done with some evidence that this even occured, no? Maybe I'm wrong?)
I agree, but when you can show that someones arguments don't make sense, even with their unproven and possibly incorrect assumptions taken as true, so much the better.
yummyfur is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 09:33 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Back in Reykjavik.
Posts: 2,471
Default

The true father of Jesus was Hamed the goat milk deliveryman :Cheeky:
Frikki is offline  
Old 06-17-2005, 08:17 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by offa
James was born in A.D. 1 and his birth was long after Antipater was executed. Jesus and James were full blooded brothers.

Antipater was imprissoned at Herodium and both he and his father (Herod) died there. Herodium and Bethlehem are not far apart.


offa
Well, this new book would say that Antipater was Jesus' father and, after being killed by his own father, Herod, Mary then remarried and had subsequent children by Joseph. Thus James would have been Jesus' half-brother.

Hmmm. Is it possible that Joseph of Aramathia is Jesus; mother's husband...?
Tholzel is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 05:38 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 533
Default

Why reach for complex theories when the most obvious one will suffice? Joseph was likely the father of Jesus. Consider the genealogies of Jesus through Joseph listed in the "gospels.�

While I reject the fabulous claims :down: of these retrospective texts, I see no reason to doubt their veracity on such a prosaic matter.
Dr_Paine is offline  
Old 06-22-2005, 01:09 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_Paine
Why reach for complex theories when the most obvious one will suffice? Joseph was likely the father of Jesus. Consider the genealogies of Jesus through Joseph listed in the "gospels.�

While I reject the fabulous claims :down: of these retrospective texts, I see no reason to doubt their veracity on such a prosaic matter.
Joseph was about to divorce Mary when he found out she was pregnant...
He knew he was not the father...
Thomas II is offline  
Old 06-22-2005, 08:04 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas II
Joseph was about to divorce Mary when he found out she was pregnant...
He knew he was not the father...
As I have no faith in the divine authorship of the Bible, "I have no horse in this race." However, one wonders why the reference to Joseph in the genealogy of Jesus. :huh:
Dr_Paine is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.