FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2007, 06:35 AM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, United States of Europe.
Posts: 172
Default

If Jesus was born around the winter solstice, then when would he have been conceived? My, my - what a coincidence.
Ecrasez L'infame is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:30 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: WHERE GOD IS NOT!!!!!
Posts: 4,338
Default

Thanks everyone. It's very interesting to know the history behind this.
BadBadBad is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:36 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

As Roger pointed out, the "messyness" of the date comes from attempts to reconcile both Lunar and Solar calendars. The date ends up being somewhere in the vicinity of the vernal equinox, i.e. the day on which the length of night equals the length of day. After that the day is longer. So this date symbolizes a victory of light over darkness. Now think what Jesus' resurrection after being crucified symbolizes, and you'll see why Easter ends up in the vicinity of the vernal equinox.

The vernal equinox is celebrated in lots of ways by lots of cultures, just do a google and you'll see.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 08:29 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecrasez L'infame
If Jesus was born around the winter solstice, then when would he have been conceived? My, my - what a coincidence.
Even though Christmas as a holiday was set close to the winter solstice, the month (much less the day) that Jesus was born is unknown, and most probably not in the month of December.
Cege is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 08:48 AM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, United States of Europe.
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege View Post
Even though Christmas as a holiday was set close to the winter solstice, the month (much less the day) that Jesus was born is unknown, and most probably not in the month of December.
Well, of course. But we're in myth-world here. It doesn't matter when these things actually happened, or even if they did. All that's important is that people think they did. So, in myth-world: if Jesus was born on the winter solstice, then he was conceived around the spring equinox. In fact, allowing for the fertile period in the female 28-day "lunar" cycle, which is about a week after menstruation...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege
Easter must be on a Sunday and must be the first Sunday after the first full moon after the Spring equinox.
... no, that way lies madness.
Ecrasez L'infame is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 10:31 AM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
The events took place after the passover
Just a slight pedantic quibble. The "Passover" or "Pesach" is a week long festival. In Matt. Mark and Luke, the Last Supper is the "Passover Seder" which takes place on the first day of Passover in the evening (not forgetting that the day starts around sunset). The arrest, trial and crucifixion all occur on the first day of Passover (15th of the Jewish month Nisan). In John, the Last Supper, arrest, trial and crucifixion all actually occur on the 14th Nisan - the day before the first day of Passover. John draws a parallel between Jesus and the Passover lamb which is sacrificed on the 14th and eaten in the Pasover Seder (so I am told).

The big problem with the synoptic timing is, of course, that there is no way a trial before the Sanhedrin could occur on the first day of Passover.
jeremyp is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 10:53 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyp
The big problem with the synoptic timing is, of course, that there is no way a trial before the Sanhedrin could occur on the first day of Passover.
Do you mean that the events couldn't all have occured within the hours available in the first day of Passover?
Cege is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 01:07 PM   #28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege View Post
Do you mean that the events couldn't all have occured within the hours available in the first day of Passover?
No. The first day of Passover was a major holiday and the same rule to do no work applied as for the Sabbath.
jeremyp is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 03:20 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:
The first day of Passover was a major holiday and the same rule to do no work applied as for the Sabbath.
Thanks for that answer. In what body of writing/law was the 1st day set as a major holiday and the rule written to observe it as a Sabbath?
Cege is offline  
Old 04-09-2007, 06:47 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 152° 50' 15" E by 31° 5' 17" S
Posts: 2,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBadBad View Post
So, I'm still missing the link between the Jewish passover celebration and the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Any help there?
Yes. According to John 19:14 Jesus was executed on the of preparation for the Passover, while according to Mark 14:12 Jesus celebrated the Feast of the Passover with his disciples ('The Last Supper') and was executed the following day.
Agemegos is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.