Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-01-2005, 11:18 PM | #291 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:20 PM | #292 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:22 PM | #293 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:27 PM | #294 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
|
|
12-02-2005, 02:19 AM | #295 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 582
|
Quote:
Firstly, beacuse it is one of the instances where scientific evidence has very direct bearing on the veracity of the Bible. (A global flood clearly should show up in the geological record if it really happened.) Secondly, because the evidence demonstrates conclusively that it did not happen, and that the Bible is therefore inaccurate in this regard. Thirdly, because a number of the regular posters in E/C - myself included - have professional expertise in this area and can explain the evidence in detail. Fourthly, because this evidence is by and large easily accessible, first-hand, to the interested layperson. You don't need fancy equipment: all you require is a geological map of your local area and some form of transport. Fifthly, because the subject is inappropriate here and E/C is where it belongs. Amaleq13, BC&H moderator So what do you think? Will you pay us a visit? Cheers, Per |
||
12-02-2005, 02:20 AM | #296 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
aChristian:
You STILL haven't posted on the E/C thread created for you. Furthermore, thanks to the IIDB search facility, I can see that you have NEVER posted in the E/C forum, except on ONE thread, Phyllis Schlafly takes on evolution, in which you had a total of 13 posts that said nothing of substance: pretty much the same empty assertions you've made here. No amount of wishful thinking will make ICR's nonsense correct. Quote:
Quote:
(...which does again raise the question of why you're here?) By the way, the thread Inerrantists: please demonstrate that ANY part of the Bible is "divinely inspired" is now sinking into oblivion because no Christian could provide any actual evidence for this. |
||
12-02-2005, 06:18 AM | #297 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 10,056
|
Quote:
WMD |
||
12-02-2005, 07:28 AM | #298 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Stockholm/Sweden
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
What it all boils down to is that which is stated above. How can any one argue logically against a conviction such as that? Ultimately every claim from aChristian is part scientific (has a scientific retorique at least) up to the point where he has his backa against the inerrant Bible and the unquestionable truth of the eye-witnesses and the fact [sic] that God can't be wrong or lie. The omnipotent God that can create the universe 6000 bc (or whatever), but make it look like it was older (for instance by tampering with carbon dating, fossils, expansion of the universe, evolution etc) can not be questioned under these circumstanses. Every piece of scientifically verified evidence or well established theory that contradict said conviction is either biased or, if infact correct even with the fundy's eyes, deliberatly placed there by the Devil to delude humans because God can't be wrong! So why even bother? It's really like knocking the head agains a brick wall. Faith is double-edged. On the one hand people of religios faith (fundies) are the most gullible, naïv humans one can ever think of. Taking a Book and believing every word of it, stating the Book in itself to be the proof. On the other hand, they do not believe any scientific study, theory or law if they can not touch it, experiance it first hand or have their local priest sanctioning it and even then, it could be the work of the Devil. On a philosophical note, what good is a world where everything is thought to be one way, but appears to be in a totally different way? It's like living on a stage with the only world you see and can interact with are the decors and the props put there by an almighty director. Is a worldview that stretches beyond the presumed scenery viable in any practical maner when that unfailingly causes any absolutes and all knowledge to be rendered worthless? I would define such faith as pure evil if I instead choose to believe in reason and in what I see. And infact, I do. |
|
12-02-2005, 09:01 AM | #299 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
That's very disappointing. |
|
12-02-2005, 08:04 PM | #300 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|