Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-07-2009, 04:37 PM | #61 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
|
07-07-2009, 09:39 PM | #62 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Uhm, you do realize that the NT had multiple authors, don't you? One verse doesn't prove anything, because the NT is not a singular work. If you want to make inroads here, you have to have sophisticated arguments that start with minimal assumptions.
|
07-08-2009, 12:14 AM | #63 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
Eusebius tells us that the Gnostics were "Christian heretics" living in the past alongside the canonical christians with their own libraries and own series of extra books, like the Gospels of Peter and Paul and Mary. Serapion was able to walk into a heretical library and borrow the gPeter with his orthodox library card. It just does not wash. |
|
07-08-2009, 09:46 AM | #64 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
“That the people, in front of captive Jesus, passed suddenly from admiration to hatred and that, to not contentedly to prefer Barabbas to him, they asked with rage that Pilate crucify him; that Pilate lent himself at once to this furious whim. Those are all details, which fit better the category of legendary fiction than history and which would rather resemble for a purpose of theater in a melodrama or a childish tale rather than with reality. Finally the coincidence of two Jesus, both “son of the father,” is too singular to be true. One can conclude firmly with Loisy that, from the point of view of the history, the incident of Barabbas is an “improbable fiction.” JESUS BARABBAS by P. - L COUCHOUD AND R. STAHL Jake Jones IV |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|