FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2004, 01:13 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 10,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Jones
I can answer your question, in as much detail as you wish. However,if your question is philosophical I think it should not be answered on the 'elsewhere' forum. Sorry.
I'm pretty sure that if you have some actual point to this discussion, and offer some proof and evidence... it might get moved back to philosphy. Until you give some, though, I kinda see why it's in ~~elsewhere~~...
muidiri is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:14 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: cardiff
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueskyboris
Why Wiploc, why? Why weed white willows when white willow warrant white willows? When Wiploc whips white willows with White Willy, where will White Willy whine? Whatup Wippy? Whoopers will wade with Wittgenstein when winter waxes. Where why, why where, where why, where why, why where? When wankers whinge where Washington willed, will witless witches wish with warming wishbone wobbling while wonderful wonks wank with wood, woof, woof, woof?
Wiploc - why haven't you edited this post like you edit mine? Do you have favourites?
John Jones is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:18 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Jones
Wiploc - why haven't you edited this post like you edit mine? Do you have favourites?
For one thing, complaints about moderation belong in the Problems and Complaints forum.

For another, I don't see as how that post violates any of the rules of the Elsewhere forum or of IIDB in general.

For yet another, I'm pretty certain Wiploc is not a moderator of the Elsewhere forum.
Mageth is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:38 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: cardiff
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muidiri
I'm pretty sure that if you have some actual point to this discussion, and offer some proof and evidence... it might get moved back to philosphy. Until you give some, though, I kinda see why it's in ~~elsewhere~~...
This is the whole point isn't it? You philosophy guys here actually, really, find it difficult to understand some things. What don't you understand? Counting?
Why am I answering it here? Are you happy that I should answer it here? Yes, of course you are.
Alright.
We cannot count what we cannot distinguish.
OK? Now whats hard about that? We cannot count what we cannot distinguish. If I cannot tell one thing from another I could count one thing more than once. So. We cannot count what we cannot distinguish. The members of a heap are all the same. So, we cannot count what we cannot distinguish.
How far do I need to spell this out?
John Jones is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:42 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: cardiff
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
For one thing, complaints about moderation belong in the Problems and Complaints forum.

For another, I don't see as how that post violates any of the rules of the Elsewhere forum or of IIDB in general.

For yet another, I'm pretty certain Wiploc is not a moderator of the Elsewhere forum.
<Complaints about Forum Moderation should be addressed in the P&C forum only - someotherguy>
John Jones is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:45 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 33
Default That's a heap of W's..... OR... Are They M's????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueskyboris
Why Wiploc, why? Why weed white willows when white willow warrant white willows? When Wiploc whips white willows with White Willy, where will White Willy whine? Whatup Wippy? Whoopers will wade with Wittgenstein when winter waxes. Where why, why where, where why, where why, why where? When wankers whinge where Washington willed, will witless witches wish with warming wishbone wobbling while wonderful wonks wank with wood, woof, woof, woof?


W's? or M's? See.... You CAN'T sort them out.....
JicJac is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:57 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Jones
That post violates the rules of the philosophy forum.
It wasn't made in the Philosophy forum.

Quote:
Editted...
Again, complaints about moderation belong in the Problems and Complaints forum.

If you have a complaint about a post on any thread, use the "report post to moderator(s)" button (the little red-and-white triangle with an ! at the lower left of the post).

Quote:
...For...
And if you have a problem with that, take it up with Wiploc and/or lodge a complaint on the P&C forum.

Quote:
Consistency
It strikes me that some people whine too much.

It's not that difficult to adhere to the rules and regulations on this board. Doing so does not make one a "toady", nor does it indicate that one is seeking "favoured status."

BTW, if you want your threads to remain in the Philosophy forum, perhaps you should actually try putting some Philosophy in them.
Mageth is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 02:21 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: cardiff
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
BTW, if you want your threads to remain in the Philosophy forum, perhaps you should actually try putting some Philosophy in them.
.. I wonder why you said that. The philosophy that was in my posts was new and controversial. And really, isn't that the reason why you wanted to move them?
I think I have stumbled across a cell of unimaginative, possibly retired, opinionated philosophers. Yes, I notice your reliance on the regulations, which stand for you like some moral law for mankind. I also think that if you are not on the board, you certainly are likely to curry favour with them.
John Jones is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 02:42 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inside a Cheeseburger
Posts: 5,374
Default

JJ,

Quote:
We cannot count what we cannot distinguish.
OK? Now whats hard about that? We cannot count what we cannot distinguish. If I cannot tell one thing from another I could count one thing more than once. So. We cannot count what we cannot distinguish. The members of a heap are all the same. So, we cannot count what we cannot distinguish.
One indistinguishable shit atom counted. Put first counted shit atom into a second "counted heap"-----> Two indistinguishable shit atoms counted. Put into counted heap-----> Three indistinguishable shit atoms counted. Put into counted heap---->................
..........a stinking long amount of time later: 59,000,432 indistinguisable shit atoms counted. Put into counted heap----->

Whether or not an entity is distinguisable from another entity by the human eye has nothing to do with the ability to create a set. I can created a million "1s", put them into a set in a specific order {million 1s in BSB order}, shake the 1s inside my 1s set as if I am making a yummy mixed drink, and still have all the same 1s in my set. ONLY THE ORDERING HAS CHANGED. The set still exists with the same 1s. Moreover, if I do not shake my 1s set like I am making a yummy mixed drink, I can easily make subsets based on my ordering. Finally, entities that are identical can be labeled.
Blueskyboris is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 02:42 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Jones
.. I wonder why you said that. The philosophy that was in my posts was new and controversial. And really, isn't that the reason why you wanted to move them?
Umm, I had nothing to do with your threads being moved. I am not a moderator.

And the content of your posts that I've read has been rather...well...trite and inconsequential, and not really of upper forum quality. Back-of-the-cereal-box philosophy, at best. For your "philosophy" (and I use that term loosely) to actually be "new and controversial", as you claim, it would help if it was of some actual significance. That may sound harsh, but that's how I see it.

Quote:
I think I have stumbled across a cell of unimaginative, possibly retired, opinionated philosophers.
Oh, it must be some sort of conspiracy against you...I see now.

Quote:
Yes, I notice your reliance on the regulations, which stand for you like some moral law for mankind. I also think that if you are not on the board, you certainly are likely to curry favour with them.
You're not making much sense.

This is an Internet forum, nothing more, nothing less. The forum rules don't "stand for [me] like some moral law for mankind." They're just rules on a forum I happen to post on. Again, it's not too difficult to stick to the rules around here - and doing so has nothing to do with "currying favor."
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.