Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-24-2007, 04:39 PM | #111 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
|
Quote:
If so, by all means they should speak up, and I'll try to clarify. On you (singular), however, I give up. |
|
09-24-2007, 04:39 PM | #112 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 31
|
|
09-24-2007, 04:47 PM | #113 | |||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
|
|||
09-24-2007, 07:29 PM | #114 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
These posts that were split from the Argument from Ridiculousness appear to be a deliberate attempt to disrupt another thread. Clouseau cannot stand the idea that his beliefs might be ridiculous. But instead of confronting that idea head-on, he issues one-liners, non-sequiturs, misquotes his debate opponents, and generally engages in bad debate form.
This thread will be locked. If you think that there is actually a point worth discussing here, PM me to have it split off or start a new thread. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|