FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-05-2012, 06:49 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

So despite their apparently large numbers the Arians could not find a way to escape the regime that was not as strong as it would be in the days of the Nestorians.
And if Justinian was still battling pagans in his empire along with apparently popular judeophile sects, the period since Constantine was more tranquil then would be expected, suggesting that the propaganda was ignored by the political forces despite their interest in achieving uniformity
Duvduv is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 06:57 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

In what way? Arianism managed to survive among Germans and Visigoths in the far West as Nestorianism did in the East.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
What was the advantage that the Nestorians had to survive which the Arians didn't have a century earlier?
...
Geography
Duvduv is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:13 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default Ulfilas and the Gothic Arians

Eusebius of Nicomedia (died 341) was the man who baptised Constantine. He was a bishop of Berytus (Beirut), then of Nicomedia in Bithynia where the imperial court resided, and finally of Constantinople from 338 to 341. Like Arius, he was a pupil of Lucian of Antioch, and he was also one of Arius' most fervent supporters.

Ulfilas, or Wulfila, little wolf (ca. 311 – 383), was a Goth or half-Goth and half-Greek from Cappadocia. Ulfilas was ordained a bishop by Eusebius of Nicomedia around 340, possibly during the council of Antioch (341) and returned to his people to work as a chorepiscopus (bishop of country people). In 348, to escape religious persecution by a Gothic chief, probably Athanaric, he obtained permission from Constantius II to migrate with his flock of converts to Moesia, south bank of the Danube and settle near Nicopolis ad Istrum, in what is now northern Bulgaria. There, Ulfilas translated the Bible from Greek into the Gothic language.

Athanaric (died 381) was king of several branches of the Thervingian Goths for at least two decades in the fourth century.
Athanaric made his first appearance in recorded history in 369, when he engaged in battle with the Eastern Roman Emperor Valens and ultimately negotiated a favorable peace for his people. During his reign, the Thervings were divided by religious issues. Many of them had converted to Arian Christianity during the fourth century, but Athanaric continued to follow the old pagan religion. According to Socrates and Sozomen, Fritigern and Athanaric were rival leaders of the Thervingian Goths. As this rivalry grew into warfare, Athanaric gained the advantage, and Fritigern asked for Roman aid. The Emperor Valens and the Thracian field army intervened. Valens and Fritigern defeated Athanaric, and Fritigern converted to Christianity, following the same arian teachings as Valens followed.
Huon is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:25 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

"Thereafter the only territory north of the Pyrenees that the Visigoths held was Septimania, such that their kingdom became limited to Hispania. The province came to be dominated by the Visigothic small governing elite at the expense of the Byzantine province of Spania and the Suebic Kingdom of Galicia


In or around 589, the Visigoths, under Reccared I, converted from Arianism to the Nicene faith, gradually adopting the culture of their Hispano-Roman subjects"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visigoths
Iskander is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:35 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

This article doesn't explain how pursuading "bishops" to accept the revised Nicene Creed ended Arianism under the Byzantines yet among the Germans Arianism existed alongside Nicenism, although this changed for reasons of conquest by the 8th century and was "suppressed" in Spain and North Africa by the 7th century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism
I presume that Arianism still accepted the virgin birth since the "created" Jesus could become the child of a woman through the same Holy Spirit.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:43 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

During the Reformation the doctrines of Arius came back:

Quote:
Jesus was not god at all, but a human prophet of God and the whole doctrine of Trinity was an umbilical sham, thought up in the years of the church’s decay...

Reformation
Diarmaid MacCulloch
Penguin Books, 2004
Page 187
Iskander is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:55 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

If the Copts still observe some Jewish practices such as circumcision, is this DESPITE their acceptance of Pauline Christianity which opposes Jewish observances for gentiles??
Duvduv is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:03 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

You questions are incomprehensible.
Iskander is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:10 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Whose questions are incomprehensible, Iskander?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
You questions are incomprehensible.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:13 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
If the Copts still observe some Jewish practices such as circumcision, is this DESPITE their acceptance of Pauline Christianity which opposes Jewish observances for gentiles??
Christianity makes all observances redundant, in toto. All the observances set up in the OT, from circumcision onwards, were merely temporary pre-figurement of the abstract concepts that were always the aim from the beginning.

If one is circumcised in order to be justified before deity, one presumably has no need of a messiah or christ (and a christ is unavailable, if it is Jesus of Nazareth).
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.