FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2008, 03:09 AM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default The Tacitus reference is 1400 years too late

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
quoted in wikipedia
Quote:
Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman wrote that: "Tacitus's report confirms what we know from other sources, that Jesus was executed by order of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, sometime during Tiberius's reign."
The Tacitus report is over a thousand years too late for Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman to use:

Quote:

"The original MSS. containing the "Annals of Tacitus" were "discovered" in the fifteenth century. Their existence cannot be traced back further than that time. And as it was an age of imposture, some persons are disposed to believe that not only portions of the Annals, but the whole work, was forged at that time. Mr. J. W. Ross, in an elaborate work published in London some years ago, contended that the Annals were forged by Poggio Bracciolini, their professed discoverer. At the time of Bracciolini the temptation was great to palm off literary forgeries, especially of the chief writers of antiquity, on account of the Popes, in their efforts to revive learning, giving money rewards and indulgences to those who should procure MS. copies of any of the ancient Greek or Roman authors. Manuscripts turned up as if by magic, in every direction; from libraries of monasteries, obscure as well as famous; the most out-of-the-way places,—the bottom of exhausted wells, besmeared by snails, as the History of Velleius Paterculus, or from garrets, where they had been contending with cobwebs and dust, as the poems of Catullus."

David W. Heley


Best wishes,



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 02-20-2008, 03:42 AM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
The Christus in Tacitus seems to be a different person.
The passage in Tacitus is a fraudulent forgery, as already known by Polydore Hochart, over 100 years ago.

Klaus Schilling
schilling.klaus is offline  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:38 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schilling.klaus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
The Christus in Tacitus seems to be a different person.
The passage in Tacitus is a fraudulent forgery, as already known by Polydore Hochart, over 100 years ago.

Klaus Schilling
Even if the passage inTacitus is a forgery, Ehrman's statement is still mis-leading. The passage does not mention Jesus.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 02-20-2008, 08:06 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
I can't locate an exact quote, but Ehrman does not support the idea that the gospels are an accurate reflection of history, but believes that there is an actual millenial Jewish prophet that the stories were based on. He does not have an interest in challenging the existence of a historical Jesus.

quoted in wikipedia
Quote:
Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman wrote that: "Tacitus's report confirms what we know from other sources, that Jesus was executed by order of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, sometime during Tiberius's reign."
But, Ehrman statement is mis-leading. Tacitus never mentioned Jesus of Nazareth, he never mentioned how Christus died, where in Judaea Christus died, the year that Christus was killed, or the age of Christus when he died.
Pontius Pilate was only governor in Judea during (part) of the reign of Tiberius, hence if Christ was killed by order of Pontius Pilate he was killed during the reign of Tiberius.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 02-20-2008, 07:18 PM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

But, Ehrman statement is mis-leading. Tacitus never mentioned Jesus of Nazareth, he never mentioned how Christus died, where in Judaea Christus died, the year that Christus was killed, or the age of Christus when he died.
Pontius Pilate was only governor in Judea during (part) of the reign of Tiberius, hence if Christ was killed by order of Pontius Pilate he was killed during the reign of Tiberius.

Andrew Criddle
You are not making much sense. If Jesus of Nazareth, assuming he existed, was crucified 35 CE, and Christus was killed 27 CE, then it would be obvious that Christus was not Jesus.

If Christus was 25 years old, was beheaded at the Dead Sea and his mother's name Yram, then it would be obvious that Christus was not Jesus of Nazareth.

And all these things could have happened during the reign of Tiberius by order of Pilate.

And the word "Christ" means "the anointed or anointed with oil" and the word "the anointed", in Hebrew, was used hundreds of years before Jesus of Nazareth.

"I am the Anointed one" can be "I am Christus" or "I am the Christ."

It is foolhardy to think that anywhere the word "Christ" appears that it must mean Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 02-25-2008, 04:34 AM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
I can't locate an exact quote, but Ehrman does not support the idea that the gospels are an accurate reflection of history, but believes that there is an actual millenial Jewish prophet that the stories were based on. He does not have an interest in challenging the existence of a historical Jesus.

quoted in wikipedia
Quote:
Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman wrote that: "Tacitus's report confirms what we know from other sources, that Jesus was executed by order of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, sometime during Tiberius's reign."
There is a big difference between not supporting an idea and saying that it is nonsense. This is why I would like to see if this is a quotation or just an interpolation.
squiz is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:26 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
This is why I would like to see if this is a quotation or just an interpolation.
Did you think to just google the phrase? It would lead you here.
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 11:31 AM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
This is why I would like to see if this is a quotation or just an interpolation.
Did you think to just google the phrase? It would lead you here.
That is the quote on Tacitus. We are looking for a citation to Ehrman saying that the mythicist hypothesis is nonsense, or words to that effect.

I don't recall that he ever said anything that definitive.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.