FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2005, 04:10 PM   #181
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
By a "web of largely unsubstantiated speculation" you probably mean, e.g. the fact that Jesus is never depicted as a crucified one during the first millenium...
Except in Paul's gospel. It isn't unsubstantiated speculation that a crucified Christ was central to his theology.

Quote:
...never hanging but always shown as if standing on the cross.
Is there evidence that other, similar art from the time tended to be more realistic in its depictions of dying demi-gods?

It seems to me this is entirely consistent with such images being created after the developed theology expressed in John. The Jesus in that story is in control of the entire process and hangs on the cross only because he wishes it to happen. He has no second thoughts nor asks to be saved as depicted in earlier versions of the story. This is a Jesus who takes his scourging and being nailed to the cross with perfect composure.

Quote:
And if you want to expose a body showing the wounds on it, especially the mortal one in the side - "of all the many stab wounds according the judgement of Antistius, his personal physician, only one was mortal, namely the second, which he took in his chest" (Suet. Div Jul. 82) -
you will certainly lash it with its arms down to the sides on a single pole.
Why do you move the mortal wound from the chest to the side? Is it because displaying a chest wound would be possible if one simply shoved a spear up the ass of the effigy?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 04:32 PM   #182
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Hey Ameleq13,

I don't think there's any point in talking with either Juliana or Aquitaine, unless you feel benevolent. Neither of them has the expertise to respond meaningfully regarding the Carotta theory. They usually don't respond to much at all and when they do respond it's mainly conjecture. We've helped enough in finding weak spots in a weak theory.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 04:55 PM   #183
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
That implies a rather late stage, I'm afraid, when you can't feel anything.
spin
I don't think I said I can't feel anything.

Quote:
Umm, Jesus wasn't stabbed in the chest. He was speared in the side. And that story is only found in the gospel of John. Are you saying that the various elements of the Caesar story found in the gospels are actually spread out, a few in this one a few in that? How do you suppose that happened??
Jesus was stabbed in the chest, interestingly by a soldier called Longinus. What is the name of the main conspirator beside Brutus? Cassius Longinus.
Most of the elements of Caesar's story are found in Mark who was used by the other synoptics. But there are elements in the other gospels as well.
How exactly that happened is an interesting question and Carotta has explanations for that but it certainly is worthy of further research.

Quote:
The two accounts do not concur in the facts Carotta is trying to deal with, so he has conflated them, as a christian apologist conflates the contrary birth narratives.
Carotta gives good reasons why they can be conflated and he certainly didn't do it "as a christian apologist conflates the contrary birth narratives." Read the whole book and the additional material on the website.

Quote:
Have a look at the foot of the column of Trajan, you'll see a relatively clear relief of a tropaeum of the form you're interested in.
Good example.

Juliana
Juliana is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 05:36 PM   #184
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
Jesus was stabbed in the chest, interestingly by a soldier called Longinus.
You seem to be getting your stories confused. Caesar was stabbed in the chest but the Gospel stories describe Jesus getting stabbed in the side. Remember how you changed it from "chest" to "side" in your earlier post? I assumed that was to create the appearance of correspondence.

Where in the Gospels do you find the soldier named "Longinus"? It is my understanding that this legend cannot be dated any earlier than the 6th century CE.

Quote:
Most of the elements of Caesar's story are found in Mark who was used by the other synoptics.
Well, most of the elements of Caesar's story can be made to parallel Mark's story if unsubstantiated speculation is allowed. I think it would be curious if such parallels could not be found given such lenient standards.

What is the parallel for Mark's depiction of Jesus' family considering him crazy?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 05:37 PM   #185
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
I don't think I said I can't feel anything.
It's past the feeling pain stage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
Jesus was stabbed in the chest,
Are you now redefining pleura?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
interestingly by a soldier called Longinus.
Which gospel says "Longinus"??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
Most of the elements of Caesar's story are found in Mark
A few events in Caesar's life:
  1. Caesar is kidnapped by Cilician pirates
  2. Caesar has a son by Cleopatra
  3. Caesar was married a few times and had several affairs
  4. Caesar held various political offices including the highest in the land
  5. Caesar crossed the Rubicon -- he didn't just splash in it
  6. Caesar travelled throughout the Mediterranean area
  7. Caesar laid siege to several places in Gaul
  8. and on and on...
Most of the elements of Caesar's story? What utter crap. You can play with names and stretch events and conflate them, but this claim is utter crap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
How exactly that happened is an interesting question and Carotta has explanations for that but it certainly is worthy of further research.
Naturally the epistemology, the central part of Carotta's effort, is missing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
Carotta gives good reasons why they can be conflated and he certainly didn't do it "as a christian apologist conflates the contrary birth narratives." Read the whole book and the additional material on the website.
You've failed to make a single case in favour of a Carotta reconstruction. Either it's your fault for misrepresenting him or it's your fault for picking this schemozzle. Enough already.

:wave:


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 05:47 PM   #186
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
I don't think there's any point in talking with either Juliana or Aquitaine, unless you feel benevolent. Neither of them has the expertise to respond meaningfully regarding the Carotta theory. They usually don't respond to much at all and when they do respond it's mainly conjecture. We've helped enough in finding weak spots in a weak theory.
While I am typically a paragon of benevolence , I have to agree that I'm not inclined to pursue this much further. I assume what we've seen is certainly no stronger an argument than we might expect for any other specific claim. I have to conclude that Carotta is an excellent writer to obtain so much conviction on the basis of so little objective evidence.

He should start a cult.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 06:06 PM   #187
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Which gospel says "Longinus"??
spin
The apocryphal Gospel of Nicodemus

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
A few events in Caesar's life:
  1. Caesar is kidnapped by Cilician pirates
  2. Caesar has a son by Cleopatra
  3. Caesar was married a few times and had several affairs
  4. Caesar held various political offices including the highest in the land
  5. Caesar crossed the Rubicon -- he didn't just splash in it
  6. Caesar travelled throughout the Mediterranean area
  7. Caesar laid siege to several places in Gaul
  8. and on and on...
Most of the elements of Caesar's story? What utter crap. You can play with names and stretch events and conflate them, but this claim is utter crap.
spin
It has been said repeatedly here that the story begins on the Rubicon. You perfectly know that. Caesar's travelling through the Mediterranean sea is Jesus' traveling on the thalassa (the sea, not the limne, the lake).

Quote:
Naturally the epistemology, the central part of Carotta's effort, is missing.
We were not discussing epistemology. Just read your Popper that's enough for you, you won't understand anything else anyway.

Quote:
You've failed to make a single case in favour of a Carotta reconstruction. Either it's your fault for misrepresenting him or it's your fault for picking this schemozzle. Enough already.
The attentive readers here have no problem discerning who is misrepresenting and distorting facts all the time an especially nice example being your eli, eli... outburst.
"Schemozzle" certainly is the right word for what you have been enacting here.
Juliana is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 06:12 PM   #188
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Juliana: :wave:
spin is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 06:25 PM   #189
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Juliana: :wave:
spin: :wave:
Juliana is offline  
Old 05-08-2005, 06:26 PM   #190
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
While I am typically a paragon of benevolence , I have to agree that I'm not inclined to pursue this much further. I assume what we've seen is certainly no stronger an argument than we might expect for any other specific claim. I have to conclude that Carotta is an excellent writer to obtain so much conviction on the basis of so little objective evidence.

He should start a cult.
Dunno 'bout that, as most cult followers must have reading problems.

But it's definitely time to cut the carottid artery.
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.