FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-05-2004, 10:36 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
1) Heaven contains those gems. How is that actually a reward?
You just answered your own question. Islam heaven = houris. Christian heaven = gold and precious stones.

Quote:
Yes it may be very pretty, but not really something I care about.
Don't make the mistake of assuming that all True Christians are like you. Some of them get off on the idea of a rich, gold- and gem-filled heaven.

Quote:
And of course those gems described in Revelation could be symbolically describing the array of colors and brightness eminating through Heaven.
And hell could be a symbolic place, and Jesus could be a symbolic person. Or is something only symbolic when it suits your interpretation?

Quote:
Watching people serve out their fate because they rejected God is not a reward.
Oh, you mean that in heaven, you'll be able to watch people roast in hell? Well, that makes it even more of a good deal for some of the heavenly denizens.

By the way, why do you harp upon the word "reward", a word I didn't use?
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 06-05-2004, 11:50 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starboy
Sounds like a crock to me. The part that gave you away was the "conditioning" to turn away from god. There is no such conditioning. The idea is to create a country were there is freedom of relgion. Make a note of that. And what other religions did you study and why did you reject them?

Starboy
Well, that's because you misunderstood what I wrote. I did not state I was conditioned to not believe in God, I stated that the conditioning I was getting to believe in God is what turned me against believing.

So, if what I state sounds like a crock to you, you are calling me a liar. It is apparent that you need to read better and not be so judgemental.
mrmoderate is offline  
Old 06-05-2004, 11:53 PM   #33
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
2) How is this a reward? There are only a couple people to ever live that it would be hard to feel sorry for in Hell ( ie. Hitler, Stalin type). Watching people serve out their fate because they rejected God is not a reward.
Except that several theologians in Magus55's adopted religion have thought otherwise, as explained in this article on Hell.

Quote:
"How I shall admire, how laugh, how exalt when I behold so many proud monarchs groaning in the lower abyss of darkness . . . so many sage philosophers blushing in red hot fires with their deluded pupils." -- Tertullian, 2nd-3rd-cy. Church Father

"The elect will come forth to behold the torments of the ungodly, and at this spectacle they will not be smitten with sorrow; on the contrary, while they see the unspeakable sufferings of the ungodly, they, intoxicated with joy, will thank God for their own salvation." -- Peter Lombard, 12th-cy. theologian

"in order that nothing may be wanting to the happiness of the blessed in Heaven, a perfect view is granted them of the tortures of the damned." -- St. Thomas Aquinas, 13th-cy. great philosopher and theologian

"The sight of hell's torments will exalt the happiness of the saints forever." He also proclaimed: "Can the believing husband in Heaven be happy with his unbelieving wife in Hell? Can the believing father in Heaven be happy with his unbelieving children in Hell? Can the loving wife in Heaven be happy with her unbelieving husband in Hell? I tell you, yea! Such will be their sense of justice that it will increase rather than diminish their bliss." -- Jonathan Edwards, popular 18th-cy. clergyman
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-05-2004, 11:56 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdemar
Your mistake is that you are assuming that the Bible is true before you even start, or it would be impossible to come to this conclusion.
No, it is you that has mistakenly assumed wrongly. I started out my agenda against Judeo/Christianity by assuming the bible must have been a lying fabrication. It was my study of it and the minute historical evidence of the places of the bible along with the teachings of the stories that led me to believe that the bible tells us the truth. I don't expect everyone to understand my conclusions or feel the same way that I do but I at least give everyone else the courtesy of not making assumptions of their beliefs.
mrmoderate is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 12:04 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WWLLD?
Posts: 2,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Why should i defend it?...<snip>
b/c.. in THIS thread you said...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
<snip>...If you claim something as a fact, you better be able to support it or you will be called on it.
-cheers
Krosis is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 12:54 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Champaign, IL or Boston, MA
Posts: 6,360
Default

Newton:

Huh? You don't seem to care to adress any of the points brought up in this thread.
xorbie is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 08:39 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nisswa, Minnesota U.S.A.
Posts: 1,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmoderate
No, it is you that has mistakenly assumed wrongly. I started out my agenda against Judeo/Christianity by assuming the bible must have been a lying fabrication. It was my study of it and the minute historical evidence of the places of the bible along with the teachings of the stories that led me to believe that the bible tells us the truth.
Along with any Tom Clancy novel.
Valdemar is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 09:02 AM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmoderate
So, if what I state sounds like a crock to you, you are calling me a liar. It is apparent that you need to read better and not be so judgemental.
My bad, I misread it. So are you going to answer the last question?

Starboy
Starboy is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 12:25 PM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

By comparison, Islam has a delightfully sybaritic Paradise. It has:

Lots and lots of water
Lush gardens
No extremes of temperature
Milk that does not spoil
Honey that does not crystallize
Wine that does not cause drunkenness or hangovers
Fresh fruit
Tasty bird meats to eat
Couches, rugs, pillows, fancy clothes, jewelry, ...
Lots of cute preteen servant boys
Lots of houris, those perpetually-virginal lovely ladies

Interestingly, modern technology has implemented most of the Islamic paradise; the attention paid to the last item suggests that that continues to be beyond our technology's grasp.

However, I don't know of any Muslims who claim that watching the sufferings of those sent to Hell is one of the main joys of Paradise.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-06-2004, 02:33 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdemar
Along with any Tom Clancy novel.
Sorry, never read Tom Clancey

Are his books relevant?
mrmoderate is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.