FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2008, 06:48 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John View Post
Plenty of atheist scholars have tried to prove the Bible wrong and failed. The Bible has more pieces of evidence than any other sacred work.
That is a laughable claim you are making John. EVERY Atheist scholar who has tackled the subject has easily shown the bible to be fiction. They have also easily demonstrated that it is the province of the unscrupulous and the simple.
There is no such thing as a “sacred” work that is not a piece of fiction. “Sacred” is merely a catchword con men use to attribute importance where there is none.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:35 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NW WA
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bible John View Post
the book that I have been studying is called Introduction to the New testament by Carson and Moo. (or via: amazon.co.uk)

Its quite scholarly and not for lamon types, but for intellectuals. There is plenty of evidence in the book that the Bible is a authentic book.
So, are you saying that you consider yourself an "intellectual", John? I mean, if you are, you might want to learn how to spell "lamon" correctly before continuing to call yourself an intellectual. I'm pretty sure that real intellectuals know that "lamon" is actually "layman".

You've got a college degree from a Christian university and the entire time you were there thought that when your professors said "layman" you thought they acutally said "lamon"?

(Too funny :funny: )
AKAWhatever is offline  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:43 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
The Bible has more pieces of evidence than any other sacred work.
One christian lying and another swearing to it is hardly evidence.

Archaeology has demolished the Old Testament. As far as the NT is concerned there is not a single legitimate historical ( i.e. non-canonical reference) to any Jesus of Nazareth.
Minimalist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.