![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: arizona
Posts: 464
|
![]()
I wonder if this bothers atheists.
Does is bother anyone when I write, “blessed be�? because it is like saying god bless you or goddess bless. No one has cared about it. So, wiccans are more liked than other religious people. What if a Christian/Muslim/Jew (evil person) wrote god bless you, you would insult him, wouldn’t you? And don’t criticize me for this, because all of you atheists bash monotheistic religions a lot too.So, you can’t say that it is wrong if I bash them. You can’t be hypocrites! Blessings to: Mike Rosoft. A member of this board who said that it is the only religion based on human rights. :notworthy Atheism would be popular if: -There were an atheist symbol -magick was added, people adore magick. Blessed be, ![]() T. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
|
![]()
Currently, atheists oppose Wicca less than they oppose the monotheistic religions. However, you, truthie, may bring about a change in this trend.
[insult deleted] or just has growing up to do? For the life of me I can’t decide. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
|
![]()
It's not your "blessed be" that bothers me. It's your proselytization of Wicca, complete with glaring innacuracies that I find annoying. Especially since I also moderate ~Elsewhere~.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
|
![]() Quote:
Oh. That's right. You can't. Thus crumbles your argument. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hull UK
Posts: 854
|
![]() Quote:
-There are no gods. -Atheists don't believe in gods. It's not rocket science. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 207
|
![]()
And if someone told me "Blessing of Mighty Zeus/Invisible Pink Unicorn/Quetzalcoatl be upon you" ?
It would make me smile, and I appreciate the sentiment, but beyond that...so what? Also, I don't see why I need to be represented by a symbol. I'd prefer it if people actually got to know me and my opinions as opposed to glancing at the symbol on my person or website and drawing conclusions from it. And I would have to dispute your casual "people adore magick" because not everybody does. In fact, a lot of people I know think magick is a synonym for "Bullshit", and so far haven't seen any evidence to convince them otherwise. P.S. I would be interested to hear your reply to criticisms of your recent Argumentum ad numeram in this post. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,383
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Here's a better one: Maybe we should add Jesus to it. Jesus is more popular than 'magick,' I bet. On that note, I think you should start spelling magic with two Ks and a scribal E. Like this: Magikke. Or a Q, like this: Magiq. And maybe you could add an umlaut or two to make it seem even more awesöme. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At the right hand of dog
Posts: 249
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|