FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2004, 01:39 PM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GakuseiDon
I thought there was some evidence for Nazareth, even if it wasn't conclusive? Sources quoted in Christian Think-Tank: http://www.christian-thinktank.com/nazy.html
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/nazareth.html
Johann_Kaspar is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 07:42 PM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
The Gospels are all the evidence for Nazareth one needs.

Vinnie
Funny, when Bede gave a list of Gospels items which he believed to he historical, Nazareth was not one of them.

If you are one to think that most of what the Gospels say is creative writing then how can you make the affirmation that all one needs for Nazareth is the Gospels?
NOGO is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.