FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2012, 02:06 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Would you clarify this for me?
Does Marcion associate leavened bread with the Creator or with Jesus?

Who is inviting the people who refused to come to dinner in Luke 14? the Creator or Jesus?
[4:31 AM]
Iskander is offline  
Old 10-15-2012, 02:09 PM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

It would seem that there was a school of thought within Christianity which identified 'leaven' as meaning an added (unwelcomed) - even 'Jewish' - teaching to the body of Christ. The Marcionites would seem to fall into that category.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-15-2012, 02:22 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The first evidence of the use of leaven in the Roman rite occurs in the Liber Pontificalis where it is said that under Miltiades (310 - 314). He was the bishop in control of Rome when Constantine entered the city on 29 October 312. It is then we hear:

Quote:
Manichaeans were discovered in the city. From that day he brought it about that consecrated offerings from what the bishop consecrated should be sent around the churches; this is called the fermentum.
Clearly this implies that part of Constantine's efforts to bring Christianity under one rule included - temporarily at least - to adopt the same host. By Alaric's conquest of the city in 410 it probably reverted back to its 'heretical' ways.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 10-17-2012, 11:31 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
The first evidence of the use of leaven in the Roman rite occurs in the Liber Pontificalis where it is said that under Miltiades (310 - 314). He was the bishop in control of Rome when Constantine entered the city on 29 October 312. It is then we hear:

Quote:
Manichaeans were discovered in the city. From that day he brought it about that consecrated offerings from what the bishop consecrated should be sent around the churches; this is called the fermentum.
Clearly this implies that part of Constantine's efforts to bring Christianity under one rule included - temporarily at least - to adopt the same host. By Alaric's conquest of the city in 410 it probably reverted back to its 'heretical' ways.
Apart from the general problems of using the Liber Pontificalis as an historical source, this sccount seems nearly duplicated in the section on Pope Siricius
Quote:
He ordained that no priest could perform masses during all the week, unless he received from the bishop of the particular district the consecrated sign which is called the leaven.
He found Manicheans in the city and dispatched them into exile and ordained that they should not partake of communion with the faithful, because the holy body of the Lord ought not to be mutilated in a polluted mouth.
Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-17-2012, 12:35 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

You're the best Andrew. Thank you so much.
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.