Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-06-2008, 10:41 AM | #61 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2008, 10:56 AM | #62 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2008, 10:59 AM | #63 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
|
||
02-06-2008, 11:22 AM | #64 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Could you clarify ? Are you suggesting that Paul's letters could be genuine letters written by a real Paul to real churches but dated say 100 CE or later, or just that they could be 2nd cwentury pseudepigraphs ? Andrew Criddle |
|
02-06-2008, 11:38 AM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
Neil http://vridar.wordpress.com |
|
02-06-2008, 11:57 AM | #66 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2008, 12:19 PM | #67 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
It also affirms that on the very day Herod and Pilate spoke to each other the earth shook the moment Jesus' body touched the ground. The Proto-Gospel of James is set in the time of Herod and Augustus, specifically named, and in their time a mountain split in two to hide Elizabeth and John -- in a scene directly involving action and dialogue with Herod and his servants. Yet the assumption underlying your question is that these stories have a prima facie right to be read as true. I suspect your concern is only to argue the historicity of the canonical gospels and to judge them by different standards? |
|
02-06-2008, 12:22 PM | #68 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Or Paul could have been a figure in post-70 CE Christian history (he is supposed to have been the teacher of Theudas, who taught Valentinus; we don't know how old Theudas was when he taught Valentinus or when he studied under Paul, but normal lifespans would place Paul in the late first or early second century.) Even if Paul existed, the churches might not have existed - the letters could have been just a literary form to convey Paul's philosophy to a magical number of seven churches, which might have been real or hypothetical. (Are these related to the seven churches in Revelation?) (On Theudas, there is a pertinent thread here but it doesn't touch on the dating problems - it tries to use this as evidence for a historical Jesus.) Valentinus is supposed to have written most of his surviving work in Alexandria, between 117 and 138 CE. If Theudas were 70 in 120 CE, he would have been born about the time Paul started his preaching and 12 when the standard timeline has Paul arrested and taken to Rome. If Theudas were 50, he would have been born after Paul's presumed death. Of course, Theudas could have been fictional, or a student of a Pauline tradition, but it is hard to make these numbers work. |
||
02-06-2008, 01:25 PM | #69 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
When one is making a comparison between things, it is generally best to establish that they are, in fact, sufficiently similar to warrant the comparison or to justify the conclusion. Common sense, really. |
|
02-06-2008, 01:26 PM | #70 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Because your "response" completely failed to address the question. You either don't understand the question or you can't answer it or you are refusing to answer it.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|