FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2008, 10:41 AM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Why did Eusebius in "Church History" give an erroneous chronology of the Synoptics? Who is the main character of the Synoptics? Who really wrote them?

Eusebius could have truthfully claimed he does not know who or when they were written, yet he did not? Why did he do that?
Does this mean you have no answer to my question about the motivation(s) of the Gospel authors?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 10:56 AM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
In an age when most writings were works of propoganda, we assume these writings were not.
How many of these writings contained stories falsely appear to have taken place in a specific time and feature known historical figures?
I have no idea obviously. Why is that relevant?
spamandham is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 10:59 AM   #63
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Why did Eusebius in "Church History" give an erroneous chronology of the Synoptics? Who is the main character of the Synoptics? Who really wrote them?

Eusebius could have truthfully claimed he does not know who or when they were written, yet he did not? Why did he do that?
Does this mean you have no answer to my question about the motivation(s) of the Gospel authors?
Why would you think such a thing?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 11:22 AM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The basis for dating the Pauline epistles to the first century is the Book of Acts. When you conclude that Acts is fiction and not history, the whole basis of the dating scheme collapses.
Hi Toto

Could you clarify ?

Are you suggesting that Paul's letters could be genuine letters written by a real Paul to real churches but dated say 100 CE or later, or just that they could be 2nd cwentury pseudepigraphs ?

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 11:38 AM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

But, the gospels and the history of "Paul" appear to be all distortions. These writings do not represent the philosphy or tradition of the Jewish people at the time, they were erroneously and, probably deliberately, placed outside their actual chronology with the sole intention to mis-lead.

So, when it is written in the NT that certain events occurred during the time of Pilate, and certain persons lived, preached and was crucified, these are likely to be false, the author of the story was not a disciple of anyone and he was probably not even alive at the the purported time and could have had no witnesses for his report.

The NT represents a massive distortion of history, it has very little value in making a truthful representation of Jewish tradition. The NT was written in certain time zones and then placed in another to distort and mis-lead.
You are making a number of assumptions about where I am coming from that I don't think are warranted by anything I've posted here. I certainly don't see the gospels as literal history -- or any sort of history at all, nor do I take Paul's letters at face value. I've been what some, particularly those who like to impose black and white labels in debates, would call a "Jesus-Paul mythicist" for a long time. Though I think the term is silly and pointless and unhelpful in any discussions that attempt to explore the nature of the evidence and origins of Christianity.

Neil
http://vridar.wordpress.com
neilgodfrey is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 11:57 AM   #66
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
In an age when most writings were works of propoganda, we assume these writings were not.
How many of these writings contained stories falsely appear to have taken place in a specific time and feature known historical figures?
I have not surveyed the field, but one example immediately comes to mind. Josephus (a propagandist for the Jewish people) relates a story of Alexander the Great (a known historical figure) dropping by Jerusalem to sacrifice to the Hebrew God because of the astounding accuracy of a prediction in Daniel (yet to be written).
Toto is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 12:19 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
In an age when most writings were works of propoganda, we assume these writings were not.
How many of these writings contained stories falsely appear to have taken place in a specific time and feature known historical figures?
The Gospel of Peter sets a story in the time of Pilate and Herod, and further tells us that the name of the centurion who guarded the tomb was Petronius.

It also affirms that on the very day Herod and Pilate spoke to each other the earth shook the moment Jesus' body touched the ground.

The Proto-Gospel of James is set in the time of Herod and Augustus, specifically named, and in their time a mountain split in two to hide Elizabeth and John -- in a scene directly involving action and dialogue with Herod and his servants.

Yet the assumption underlying your question is that these stories have a prima facie right to be read as true. I suspect your concern is only to argue the historicity of the canonical gospels and to judge them by different standards?
neilgodfrey is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 12:22 PM   #68
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The basis for dating the Pauline epistles to the first century is the Book of Acts. When you conclude that Acts is fiction and not history, the whole basis of the dating scheme collapses.
Hi Toto

Could you clarify ?

Are you suggesting that Paul's letters could be genuine letters written by a real Paul to real churches but dated say 100 CE or later, or just that they could be 2nd century pseudepigraphs ?

Andrew Criddle
Either of those options is a possibility. I think that Robert Price thinks of the letters as second century pseudipigraphs.

Or Paul could have been a figure in post-70 CE Christian history (he is supposed to have been the teacher of Theudas, who taught Valentinus; we don't know how old Theudas was when he taught Valentinus or when he studied under Paul, but normal lifespans would place Paul in the late first or early second century.)

Even if Paul existed, the churches might not have existed - the letters could have been just a literary form to convey Paul's philosophy to a magical number of seven churches, which might have been real or hypothetical. (Are these related to the seven churches in Revelation?)

(On Theudas, there is a pertinent thread here but it doesn't touch on the dating problems - it tries to use this as evidence for a historical Jesus.)

Valentinus is supposed to have written most of his surviving work in Alexandria, between 117 and 138 CE. If Theudas were 70 in 120 CE, he would have been born about the time Paul started his preaching and 12 when the standard timeline has Paul arrested and taken to Rome. If Theudas were 50, he would have been born after Paul's presumed death. Of course, Theudas could have been fictional, or a student of a Pauline tradition, but it is hard to make these numbers work.
Toto is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 01:25 PM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

How many of these writings contained stories falsely appear to have taken place in a specific time and feature known historical figures?
I have no idea obviously. Why is that relevant?
Well, it wasn't obvious that you didn't know the answer but I would think the relevance is rather obvious since an affirmative answer would certainly support any attempted comparison.

When one is making a comparison between things, it is generally best to establish that they are, in fact, sufficiently similar to warrant the comparison or to justify the conclusion. Common sense, really.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 02-06-2008, 01:26 PM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post

Does this mean you have no answer to my question about the motivation(s) of the Gospel authors?
Why would you think such a thing?
Because your "response" completely failed to address the question. You either don't understand the question or you can't answer it or you are refusing to answer it.
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.