FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2012, 10:03 AM   #161
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Philo says that 24 is the 'substance' of the number 300 in part because

1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 = 300
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:03 AM   #162
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

There is a slightly different version of the material found in irenaeus in the Philosophumena Book Six:

Know, (therefore,) that these letters which with you are (reckoned at) twenty-four, are emanations from the three powers, and are representative of those (powers) which embrace even the entire number of the elements. For suppose that there are some letters that are mute--nine of them--of Pater and Aletheia, from the fact that these are mute--that is, ineffable and unutterable. And (again, assume) that there are other (letters that are) semi-vowels--eight of them--of the Logos and of Zoe, from the fact that these are intermediate between consonants and vowels, and receive the emanation of the (letters) above them, but the reflux of those below them. And (likewise take for granted) that there are vowels--and these are seven--of Anthropos and Ecclesia, inasmuch as the voice of Anthropos proceeded forth, and imparted form to the (objects of the) universe. For the sound of the voice produced figure, and invested them with it. From this it follows that there are Logos and Zoe, which have eight (semi-vowels); and Anthropos and Ecclesia, which have seven (vowels); and Pater and Aletheia, which have nine (mutes). But from the fact that Logos wanted (one of being an ogdoad), he who is in the Father was removed (from his seat on God's right hand), and came down (to earth). And he was sent forth (by the Father) to him from whom he was separated, for the rectification of actions that had been committed. (And his descent took place) in order that the unifying process, which is inherent in Agathos, of the Pleromas might produce in all the single power that emanates from all. And thus he who is of the seven (vowels) acquired the power of the eight (semi-vowels); and there were produced three topoi, corresponding with the (three) numbers (nine, seven, and eight),-- (these topai) being ogdoads. And these three being added one to the other, exhibited the number of the twenty-four (letters). And (he maintains), of course, that the three elements,-- (which he himself affirms to be (allied) with the three powers by conjugal union, and which (by this state of duality) become six, and from which have emanated the twenty-four elements,--being rendered fourfold by the Quaternion's ineffable word, produce the same number (twenty-four) with these. And these, he says, belong to Anonomastus. And (he asserts) that these are conveyed by the six powers into a similarity with Aoratus. And (he says) that there are six double letters of these elements, images of images, which, being reckoned along with the twenty-four letters, produce, by an analogical power, the number thirty.

What follows is particularly interesting:

And (he says) that the expressed name-- (that is, Jesus) --of the Saviour consists of six letters, but that His ineffable name, according to the number of the letters, one by one, consists of twenty-four elements, but Christ a Son of twelve. And (he says) that the ineffable (name) in Christ consists of thirty letters, and this exists, according to the letters l which are in Him, the elements being counted one by one. For the (name) Christ consists of eight elements; for Chi consists of three, and R of two, and EI of two, and I [ota], of four, S [igma] of five, and T of three, and OU of two, and San of three. Thus the ineffable name in Christ consists, they allege, of thirty letters
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-17-2012, 03:29 PM   #163
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I've been trying to find some practical context for the tradition of Mark's interest in the number 24 (= Christ). The answer is Pythagorean music theory. There are 12 keys but only with 24 can you express the ratios as whole numbers
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:20 PM   #164
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I was asking about the mark in the side where the spear went in not the spear itself.
All you asked about was the spear of penetration.

Quote:
I notice tat the nails aren't prominent either.
They may not be prominent but they're there.

Quote:
But presumably the blood would be important because of the significance of the blood to atone for sins, which is a major element.
The emphasis was more important as a sign of Victory. Note in each of these early to medieval scenes Longinus is shown about to stab Jesus with the spear. Why they didn't want to show the blood itself, I don't know. :huh:
la70119 is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:00 AM   #165
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

It can't be accidental that you need twenty four notes to develop all the intervals in music theory. I know this may seem like an unnecessary tangent. But I am trying to understand why the Alexandrian tradition would have taken such an interest in the number 24:



We can't forget that the 'Diatessaron' gospel is taken straight from musical theory. The word 'canon' is Pythagorean and Clement often uses the term in the Pythagorean sense. Also, we can't over look that Christian choirs were quite famous in antiquity (imitating the angels) but clearly deriving from the antiphonal choirs of the Therapeutae described in Philo.

The earthly Church is imitating the heavenly assembly which are stoicheia
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:16 AM   #166
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

A couple of more things. When the Marcosians say:

Quote:
Thus, then, Logos and Zoe possess eight [of these letters]; Anthropos and Ecclesia seven; and Pater and Aletheia nine. But since the number allotted to each was unequal, He who existed in the Father came down, having been specially sent by Him from whom He was separated, for the rectification of what had taken place, that the unity of the Pleromas, being endowed with equality, might develop in all that one power which flows from all. Thus that division which had only seven letters, received the power of eight, and the three sets were rendered alike in point of number, all becoming Ogdoads; which three, when brought together, constitute the number four-and-twenty.
This is derived from Philo who expresses the three ogdoads in slightly different form. The twenty four says the Alexandrian:

Quote:
is composed of three cubes (= 1 x 3 x 8)
In other words the Marcosians are literally producing three ogdoads which Philo expresses as 1 x 3 x 8.

Also, Philo says:

Quote:
the number twenty four ... is the substance (οὐσία) of the three hundred
here is the entry for οὐσία:

Quote:
οὐσί-α , Ion.
A. “-ιη” Hdt.1.92, 6.86.ά, SIG167.26 (Mylasa, iv B. C.); Dor. ἐσσία , ὠσία (qq. v.): ἡ: (ὀντ-, part. of εἰμί sum):—that which is one's own, one's substance, property, Hdt. ll.cc., S.Tr.911 (s. v. l.), E. HF337, Hel.1253 (pl., Fr.354 (s. v. l.)), Ar.Ec.729, Lys.18.17, Pl.R. 551b, SIGl.c., etc.; opp. τὰ σώματα (civil status), And.1.74; “καλῶς . . ἐπεμελήθη τῶν οὐσιῶν ὑπὲρ τοῦ δημάρχου” BSA24.154 (Attica, iv B.C.); εἰ ἐκεκτήμην οὐ. if I had been a man of substance, Lys.24.11; “ὑπὲρ τὴν οὐ. δαπανᾶν” Diph.32.7; “πατρῴαν οὐ. κατεσθίειν” Anaxipp.1.32, cf. Critias 45 D.; φανερὰ οὐσία real property, immovables, And.1.118; opp. ἀφανής, Lys.32.4; freq. of estates in Egypt, PTeb.6.23 (ii B. C., pl.), BGU650.3 (i A. D.), OGI665.30 (i A. D.), etc.
II. in Philos., like Ion. φύσις (with which it is interchanged in various uses, e. g. Philol. 11, Pl.R.359a, 359b, Arist.PA646a25, Thphr.HP6.1.1), stable being, immutable reality, opp. “γένεσις, ὅτιπερ πρὸς γένεσιν οὐσία, τοῦτο πρὸς πίστιν ἀλήθεια” Pl.Ti.29c, cf. Sph.232c; “ὧν κίνησις γένεσιν παραλαβοῦσα ἀέναον οὐ. ἐπόρισεν” Id.Lg.966e; “γένεσις μὲν τὸ σπέρμα, οὐ. δὲ τὸ τέλος” Arist.PA641b32, cf. 640a18, etc.; “ὁδὸς εἰς οὐσίαν” Id.Metaph.1003b7: hence, being in the abstract, opp. non-being (τὸ μὴ εἶναι), Pl.Tht.185c.
2. substance, essence, opp. πάθη ('modes'), Id.Euthphr.11a; “πάθη οὐσίας” Arist.Metaph.1003b7; opp. συμβεβηκότα ('accidents'), Id.APo.83a24, PA643a27; “ἡ φύσις [τῆς ψυχῆς] καὶ ἡ οὐ., εἶθ᾽ ὅσα συμβέβηκε περὶ αὐτήν” Id.de An.402a8.
3. true nature of that which is a member of a kind, defined as “ὃ τυγχάνει ἕκαστον ὄν” Pl.Phd.65d; as τὸ ὅ ἐστι ib.92d; as “τὸ τί ἐστι” Arist.APo. 90b30; τὸ εἶναί τε καὶ τὴν οὐ. Pl.R.509b; expressed in a formula or definition, “ψυχῆς οὐ. τε καὶ λόγον” Id.Phdr.245e; “τὸ τί ἦν εἶναι οὗ ὁ λόγος ὁρισμός, καὶ τοῦτο οὐ. λέγεται” Arist.Metaph.1017b22; μόνης τῆς οὐ. ἐστὶν ὁ ὁρισμός ib. 1031a1.
4. the possession of such a nature, substantiality, “ἔτι ἐπέκεινα τῆς οὐ. πρεσβείᾳ . . ὑπερέχοντος” Pl.R. 509b.
5. in the concrete, the primary real, the substratum underlying all change and process in nature, applied by Arist. to the atoms of Democritus, Fr.208; to “τὰ ἁπλᾶ σώματα” Id.Cael.298a29, cf. Metaph. 1017b10; “πᾶσαι αἱ φυσικαὶ οὐ. ἢ σώματα ἢ μετὰ σωμάτων γίγνονται” Id.Cael.298b3, al.; “ταὐτὸν σῶμα καὶ οὐσίαν ὁριζόμενοι” Pl. Sph.246a; but also, νοητὰ ἄττα καὶ ἀσώματα εἴδη . . τὴν ἀληθινὴν οὐ. ib.b.
6. in Logic, substance as the leading category, Arist. Cat.1b26, Metaph.1045b29; αἱ πρῶται οὐ. (individuals), αἱ δεύτεραι οὐ. (species and genera), Id.Cat.2b5, 2a15 (but “ὁ ἄνθρωπος καὶ ὁ ἵππος . . οὐκ ἔστιν οὐ. ἀλλὰ σύνολόν τι” Id.Metaph.1035b29, cf. σύνθετος or συνθέτη οὐ. ib. 1043a30, de An.412a16); “ἡ μὲν ψυχὴ οὐ. ἡ πρώτη, τὸ δὲ σῶμα ὕλη” Id.Metaph.1037a5; “ἡ ψυχὴ οὐ. ὡς εἶδος” Id.de An.412a19; ἡ οὐ. ἐντελέχεια ib.21; [“ψυχὴ] οὐ. τοῦ ἐμψύχου” Id.Metaph.1035b15; of the abstract objects of mathematics, “μονὰς οὐ. ἄθετος, στιγμὴ δὲ οὐ. θετός” Id.APo.87a36.
7. after Pl. and Arist. in various uses, as ἡ ἄποιος οὐ., = ἡ ὕλη, Zeno Stoic.1.24; κατὰ οὐσίαν, opp. κατὰ δύναμιν ἢ ἐνέργειαν, Polystr.p.12 W.; πᾶς νοῦς ἀμέριστός ἐστιν οὐ. Procl.Inst.171, cf. Plot.2.4.5, 2.6.1, 4.7.8, 6.1.2, al.
8. Pythag. name for I, Theol.Ar.6.
III. name of a plaster, Aët.15.15,45.
IV. αἱ οὐ. fireresisting substances, Zos.Alch.p.168 B.; of the four σώματα (copper, tin, lead, iron), Ps.-Democr. ap. eund.p.167 B.
V. in Magic, a material thing by which a connexion is established between the person to be acted upon and the supernatural agent, e.g. a hair, “λαβὼν βελόνην διείρων τὴν οὐ. εἰς αὐτήν” PMag.Par.1.2949, cf. PMag.Osl. 1.73; mould from a tomb, PMag.Par.1.435; κυνοκεφάλου οὐ., . . κυνὸς οὐ., = κόπρος (cf. 2460), ib.2687, etc.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:25 AM   #167
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Roger Beckwith sums up the section in the following terms:

Quote:
He states in book one, section 91, and book two, section 5 of the same work that 24 is composed of twelve doubles, three cubes and twelve quadrangles, that it is the substance of 300 (if all the numbers from one to 24 are added together), that it is the number of hours in a day and night, and — significantly — that it is the number of letters in the (Greek) alphabet. But even in the last connection he is not prompted to say anything of the number of the sacred books. This does not exhaust the importance of 24, since 24 is twice twelve, and twelve is one of the most significant numbers ...
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:44 AM   #168
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

And here is Clement's references to the number twenty four:

Quote:
The names are reduced by grammar into the twenty-four general elements (τὰ μὲν οὖν ὀνόματα τῇ γραμματικῇ εἰς τὰ καθολικὰ στοιχεῖα κδʹ ἀνάγεται); for the elements must be determined. For of Particulars there is no scientific knowledge, seeing they are infinite. But it is the property of science to rest on general and defined principles. Whence also Particulars are resolved into Universals.
This may well be a standard reference to the development of letters in the alphabet. Yet the Marcoisans at least said that Christ having twenty four stoicheia (in the Marcosian system) is connected with the idea of twenty four heavenly elements. Patricia Cox Miller notes in her Poetry of Thought in Late Antiquity that:

Quote:
in one of the briefest of the magical papyri in which the devotee conjures the presence of a God "with the twelve elements (stoicheion) of heaven and the twenty-four elements (stoicheion) of the cosmos"
A similar interest in present in the writing of Paul and Clement writes in the Stromata Book Six:

Quote:
For, in truth, the covenant of salvation, reaching down to us from the foundation of the world, through different generations and times, is one, though conceived as different in respect of gift. For it follows that there is one unchangeable gift of salvation given by one God, through one Lord, benefiting in many ways. For which cause the middle wall which separated the Greek from the Jew is taken away, in order that there might be a peculiar people. And so both meet in the one unity of faith; and the selection out of both is one. And the chosen of the chosen are those who by reason of perfect knowledge are called [as the best] from the Church itself, and honoured with the most august glory -- the judges and rulers -- four-and-twenty (the grace being doubled)equally from Jews and Greeks. Since, according to my opinion, the grades here in the Church, of bishops, presbyters, deacons, are imitations of the angelic glory, and of that economy which, the Scriptures say, awaits those who, following the footsteps of the apostles, have lived in perfection of righteousness according to the Gospel. For these taken up in the clouds, the apostle writes, will first minister [as deacons], then be classed in the presbyterate, by promotion in glory (for glory differs from glory) till they grow into "a perfect man."
And Clement uses the Apocalypse of John so rarely (and the rest of the Alexandrian tradition seems to have thought it was spurious) that I wonder if we can detect another editorial addition here. The chapter from the beginning (proposed editorial addition in red):

Quote:
He, then, who has first moderated his passions and trained himself for impassibility, and developed to the beneficence of gnostic perfection, is here equal to the angels. Luminous already, and like the sun shining in the exercise of beneficence, he speeds by righteous knowledge through the love of God to the sacred abode, like as the apostles. Not that they became apostles through being chosen for some distinguished peculiarity of nature, since also Judas was chosen along with them. But they were capable of becoming apostles on being chosen by Him who foresees even ultimate issues.

Matthias, accordingly, who was not chosen along with them, on showing himself worthy of becoming an apostle, is substituted for Judas.

Those, then, also now, who have exercised themselves in the Lord's commandments, and lived perfectly and gnostically according to the Gospel, may be enrolled in the chosen body of the apostles. Such an one is in reality a presbyter of the Church, and a true minister (deacon) of the will of God, if he do and teach what is the Lord's; not as being ordained by men, nor regarded righteous because a presbyter, but enrolled in the presbyterate s because righteous.

And although here upon earth he be not honoured with the chief seat, he will sit down on the four-and-twenty thrones, judging the people, as John says in the Apocalypse.

For, in truth, the covenant of salvation, reaching down to us from the foundation of the world, through different generations and times, is one, though conceived as different in respect of gift. For it follows that there is one unchangeable gift of salvation given by one God, through one Lord, benefiting in many ways. For which cause the middle wall which separated the Greek from the Jew is taken away, in order that there might be a peculiar people. And so both meet in the one unity of faith; and the selection out of both is one. And the chosen of the chosen are those who by reason of perfect knowledge are called [as the best] from the Church itself, and honoured with the most august glory -- the judges and rulers -- four-and-twenty (the grace being doubled)equally from Jews and Greeks. Since, according to my opinion, the grades here in the Church, of bishops, presbyters, deacons, are imitations of the angelic glory, and of that economy which, the Scriptures say, awaits those who, following the footsteps of the apostles, have lived in perfection of righteousness according to the Gospel. For these taken up in the clouds, the apostle writes, will first minister [as deacons], then be classed in the presbyterate, by promotion in glory (for glory differs from glory) till they grow into "a perfect man."
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:59 AM   #169
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

What is interesting about this passage - and my proposed emendation which makes Clement a Marcosian and one who viewed Judas as a special beloved of Jesus (cf AH 2.22) is that Judas and Mary represent the two "twelves" who come together as twenty four.
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.