Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-07-2007, 10:35 PM | #581 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
I find both to be mythological — which means there is something wrong with the way you are formulating your problem.
|
04-08-2007, 07:58 AM | #582 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-08-2007, 08:21 AM | #583 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ben. |
|
04-08-2007, 08:24 AM | #584 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Which story about Zeus depicts him interacting with specific historical figures in a specific historical timeframe?
|
04-08-2007, 08:31 AM | #585 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
04-08-2007, 08:52 AM | #586 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
The greco-roman gods were declared mythological figures by the Jews and the Christians at the beginning of the common era, but there still were pagans in West Europe until the end of the Vth century. The Norman invaders (french and irish point of view ) of the VIIth-Xth century were pagans. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There are at least three sorts of HJers : 1 - these who believe in JC, and accept all the miracles and stories about JC, 2 - these who believe in JC, and still consider that some stories about him are dubious, 3 - these who do not believe in JC as a god, consider that almost what is said about him is mythology, and still can accept the idea that a man, Jehoshuah (?) by name, created a small jewish sect, and was indirectly at the origin of Christianity. |
||||
04-08-2007, 09:35 AM | #587 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
|
aa5874, possibly JC is a mythological figure, mentioned only in the NT, and known only through the religious assertions of Christian believers. But there are some other figures who could be partially or totally unhistorical (anhistorical ?) : Peter, Paul, James, the apostles, Mark, Luke, Matthew, the many Johns. However, Christianity existed, at least during the second century. Where is the frontier between purely mythological figures, and possibly/probably historical figures, who have been loaded with myths, and also credible stories, describing very small events which happened or did not happen ?
Of course, an answer is : Peter, Paul, James, the apostles, Mark, Luke, Matthew, the many Johns, are not the sons of god. But Peter at least, performed miracles. |
04-08-2007, 01:47 PM | #588 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
|
04-08-2007, 02:01 PM | #589 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
I am at present an FJer, who is attempting to research the historical invention of the new and strange Roman religious order under the malevolent despot bullneck (c.312-325CE), yet I believe I can shed some light on your perplexity. Take a look at the entity called Apollonius of Tyana, given honorable mention by our dear friend Eusebius. In a number of earlier threads entitled: comparitive historicity (Apollonius of Tyana c.f. Jesus of Nazareth) H I S T O R I C I T Y - Can it be reduced to a percentage value? the concept of historicity is discussed. Although you use the term in this thread, you yourself have not engineered any mechanism whereby the defintion of the term historicity is explored and developed with example figures. This needs to be approached and resolved in an objective manner that is amenable to all parties (or the consensus) IMO. |
|
04-08-2007, 04:47 PM | #590 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
This is the type of information that I been have looking for to lend support to the HJ position. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|