FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > The Community > Positive Atheism & Secular Activism
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2006, 02:14 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 64
Default Boycott Roland Orzabal of Tears For Fears?

I have been a big fan of Tears For Fears for a long time. I recently heard Roland Orzabal's album Tomcats Screaming Outside. The album is relatively obscure, but the music quality is not bad. Nevertheless, I was appalled at the lyrics of the song Bullets for Brains.

Here are the lyrics from the song which I found most offensive:

"Hey now, read my lips
Bullets for the brains of the atheists"

"Well I believe in angels
They move like a secret army
And they help me blow the atheists sky high"

We should demand an apology and boycott the band and their solo offshoots until such an apology is given.

Their Label is Universal Music Group. UMG's feedback email is [email protected] and their address is 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90404 and 1755 Broadway, New York, NY 10019.

Most atheists and secular humanists that I know are much more peaceful than the religious nutcases. The fact that Roland dreams of "blowing atheists sky high" is further proof that they are the violent ones causing much of the destruction in the world.

Let them know how you feel!

Mod note: Edited to add comment from AggressiveProgressiv:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AggressiveProgressiv
This OP was based on a misunderstanding. The song is obviously more complex than I had considered.
Thread title edited to include a question mark.
AggressiveProgressiv is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 02:17 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The home of Bob Jones University
Posts: 1,053
Default

It would seem I'm already boycotting them without even knowing it. I have no problem with keeping up my not listening to them.
DonnieDarko is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 03:26 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,068
Default

More of an SA thread.
Starshark is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 03:39 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,665
Default

One can hear snippets from the album Tomcats Screaming Outside (or via: amazon.co.uk) on Amazon. But why should we take this song literally? What reason do we have to believe that this song is "anti-atheist," when the lyrics could be interpreted as being representative of the ravings of a sick, fundamentalist mind? I'm not going to get upset about this song until I learn more about it. For all we know, Roland Orzabal could be an atheist talking about the thoughts of those who disagree with him.

Show me an interview or something tangible, where Orzabal discusses the meaning of this song. Don't just ask me to react to the literal reading of the lyrics. I have no idea what this song is actually about, but it doesn't necessarily come across as anti-atheist. It could very well be anti-fundamentalist, in which case we'd be agreeing with it, not protesting it.
EverLastingGodStopper is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 05:26 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EverLastingGodStopper View Post
One can hear snippets from the album Tomcats Screaming Outside (or via: amazon.co.uk) on Amazon. But why should we take this song literally? What reason do we have to believe that this song is "anti-atheist," when the lyrics could be interpreted as being representative of the ravings of a sick, fundamentalist mind? I'm not going to get upset about this song until I learn more about it. For all we know, Roland Orzabal could be an atheist talking about the thoughts of those who disagree with him.

Show me an interview or something tangible, where Orzabal discusses the meaning of this song. Don't just ask me to react to the literal reading of the lyrics. I have no idea what this song is actually about, but it doesn't necessarily come across as anti-atheist. It could very well be anti-fundamentalist, in which case we'd be agreeing with it, not protesting it.
I've done this a few times with my own music. I'm telling stories. I don't have to agree with or believe what is being said because I'm not the one that is saying it. The character portayed in the song is saying it. I've written lyrics from the point of view of creationists, fundamentalists, theocrats, crusaders, maniacs, gods and evil aliens, but if you listen to all of my music you should know that I'm an atheist.
butswana is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:16 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Given that the "Read my lips" thing is obviously a reference to George "I don't think atheists should be considered citizens" Bush Sr, I'd say it it actually a satirical song.

Indeed, this verse:

One day, one day in your life
You will see the light
You will see his face again
One day, one day at a time
Soothes the weary mind
You will feel no pain
Bullets for your brain


Seems to be saying that converting to Christianity is the intellectual equivalent of putting a bullet in your brain.

Hardly an "anti-atheism" song, by my reading of the lyrics...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:35 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,865
Arrow

An interview about nothing.

Quote:
""Having made my statement with `Raoul', I decided I didn't want to write about what's inside my head or my life any more. I just wanted to write about this and that. It's just a collection of stuff I've been working on these past three or four years; sketches, experiments. There's no overriding concept or theme this time."
In music/art one can decide to interpret charitably or not.

That said, "sowing the seeds of love" is less ambiguous.



Still, I appear to be with DonnieDarko on this one, without shooting the messenger as well (which has presented some grounds for action...even if it is for clarification).

Steve
Steve Schlicht is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:49 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Schlicht View Post
An interview about nothing.

In music/art one can decide to interpret charitably or not.
Actually, if you read the paragraph in context, it doesn't seem that the song is an anti-atheism song.
Quote:
Co-produced by Alan Griffiths and featuring musicians from the `Raoul' tour, `Tomcats Screaming Outside' is the sixth album from Roland Orzabal, but it's different from his others in that this one is, as he says, "about nothing." That's if you can describe songs that concern, variously, an atheist-killer, underage girls, our quick-fix culture, the need to anaesthetise desire and death from cancer as being "about nothing". Elucidates Roland: "Having made my statement with `Raoul', I decided I didn't want to write about what's inside my head or my life any more. I just wanted to write about this and that. It's just a collection of stuff I've been working on these past three or four years; sketches, experiments. There's no overriding concept or theme this time."
He clearly states that the song is about "an atheist-killer," or, a person who kills atheists.
EverLastingGodStopper is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:56 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,865
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by EverLastingGodStopper View Post
Actually, if you read the paragraph in context, it doesn't seem that the song is an anti-atheism song.
In case it wasn't clear in my last post, I remain neutral on the entire issue and offered a less ambiguous song to indicate how such art is "interpretive" and valued for such reasons.

Quote:
He clearly states that the song is about "an atheist-killer," or, a person who kills atheists.
That is certainly the interpretation that the biographer gives to the album.

Roland seems to give no motive/meaning one way or the other.

Steve
Steve Schlicht is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:58 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Schlicht View Post
That is certainly the interpretation that the biographer gives to the album.

Roland seems to give no motive/meaning one way or the other.
Quote:
~Roland's Official 2001 Biography ~ Courtesy of Eagle Records~
*Please note: No portion of this biography may be copied / reproduced without the consent of Eagle Records.
~Thank You, Michele R. CyberScene Editor/Webmistress
It's his official biography, according to his record label. Don't you think he approved it?
EverLastingGodStopper is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.