FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2006, 07:28 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOTG
I first state it, then I can show it. I would not want to be blamed for posting too long a post now would I? Already the post I feel is going to be too long and I have not given you the tonnes of quotes of first century writers and eyewitnesses.

Matthew, John, and Peter were eyewitnesses (original apostles) and recorded this event. Jude was the brother of Christ and recorded his findings. Others did the same such as Luke and Paul. Paul said he saw Jesus resurrected; Luke is as close as you can get to being a first hand account. Mark is also believed to be an eyewitness as there is a specific verse indicated he was at the event of one of Christ's talks. And Roman sources and Jewish sources also record this event of his death. So you have lots of sources recording this event of the historical Jesus in the first century. Many are recording this event who lived at that time, so are they all wrong or lying? It doesn't seem likely, so that takes care of (1)-they even were killed for saying they say Jesus resurrected; they were with him for three and a half years of His ministry too. Sources and quotes are forthcoming in due time.

YHWH is proven by the fact that you did not create yourself, you did not happen all by yourself, but were created. This is Yahweh in agreement with the nature of the being of God who would be righteous and holy as exhibited through Christ, and none can compare to Christ in what He did and performed and said, fulfilling over 60 prophecies which is impossible by man's standards.

This same truth teaches us that the Devil exists, that the reason why man sinned was because he was tempted, not by God (for that would be unrighteous and unholy), but was a predecessor to Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were the first God-conscious people. God through the Bible describes what happened to Satan millions or billions of years ago and why he fell out of 3rd heaven as a most beautiful angel now eternally separated from God, and why God had to make the earth desolate and waste in Gen. 1.2 because of his sin and bringing 1/3 of the fallen angels with him after he corrupted the beings that then turned into demons, now disembodied spirits. One of those spirits went into the serpent to tempt Eve. And the Bible says that evil spirit is in your spirit right now though you are a dullard unable to realize it.
What you are saying makes perfect sense...if you hold the bible as the infallible and sacred word of god, which atheists do not. You are not the first person to come here and outline our biblical destiny and, believe it or not, all of us realize that we probably would be going to biblical hell...and koranic hell and toranic sheol, etc, etc, etc.

A lot of us at IIDB, including myself, are former christians who became atheists after sometimes painful deconversions. We've put a tremendous amount of thought and "soul searching" into any number of topics theists like to throw at us. To us you are just another christian who doesn't understand how atheists think, and it is very difficult (and frustrating on boths ends) to have any meaningful conversation when you come in to our boards and refuse to meet us on our terms.
Reanimator is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 07:48 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

This thread contains some of the most intensely stupid posts I have ever seen around here. I am fairly incredulous after reading them. We have come along way from being thrown to the lions when a simple request to abide by the rules of a forum constitutes persecution.

If this thread doesn't develop some kind of substance be prepared for some more persecution as I throw this thread, and its mind-numbingly ignorant comments, into the ~Elsewhere~ arena.

Emperor Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 08:11 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOTG
Matthew, John, and Peter were eyewitnesses (original apostles) and recorded this event. Jude was the brother of Christ and recorded his findings. Others did the same such as Luke and Paul. Paul said he saw Jesus resurrected; Luke is as close as you can get to being a first hand account. Mark is also believed to be an eyewitness as there is a specific verse indicated he was at the event of one of Christ's talks. And Roman sources and Jewish sources also record this event of his death. So you have lots of sources recording this event of the historical Jesus in the first century. Many are recording this event who lived at that time, so are they all wrong or lying? It doesn't seem likely, so that takes care of (1)-they even were killed for saying they say Jesus resurrected; they were with him for three and a half years of His ministry too. Sources and quotes are forthcoming in due time.
So far, no "secular" sources.

Please state your "Roman and Jewish sources".

I'll fire up the BBQ....
Kosh is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 08:18 AM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

As hell is for eternity, do atheists get to taste all the different hells of the different religions?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 08:31 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
As hell is for eternity, do atheists get to taste all the different hells of the different religions?
Maybe it's like one of those multi-passes for the ski areas? Enjoy 4 different
Hells for the price of one! Free shuttles provided.
Kosh is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 08:57 AM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by one allegiance
I'm not sure, but are you saying it is preachy to tell people about Christ and salvation through him? That is our duty as Chritians, evangilizing. It isn't preachy, it is the one true way to God.
If only someone could tell me the difference between "preaching" and "evangilizing[sic]".

Quote:
Atheists tell us to tolerate their beliefs and not impose ours...when they are going agaisnt their philosophy all in the same breath, by not tolerating our intolerance.
It's something different to tolerate beliefs of others and actions of others. Just in case you not noticed.

Quote:
We are GOING to be mocked and persectued for what we believe and say...
Yes, many Christians have persecution complexes like this - maybe a leftover from Rome in the first and second century?

Quote:
that is prophetic
Yeah, if I made up a new religion, I certainly won't add something like "You will be mocked for your beliefs" in my story.

Quote:
but we are not supposed to be hesitant in suffering
I really wonder if some people have any idea what "suffering" actually means.

Quote:
We have been hated for what we believe in...well, since Jesus...
Yes, I'm sure Christians were hated a lot between, say, the year 400 and 1800.

Quote:
And don't you think if it was all a big hoax it would be revealed by now.
How so? Got a time machine?

Quote:
Especially around 100 AD when many Roman historians hated Christians, and would have done anything to tear Christianity apart.
And you of course have countless sources for this claim...?

Quote:
Of course it is a double standard...but it will always be like that. We are always expected to tolerate it even though they wont tolerate us.
This isn't everyday life. This is a discussion board. If you choose to participate, you agree with the rules. So don't whine later that you don't like them. This is just silly.

OK, now this thread is ready for somewhere ~else.
Sven is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 09:49 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOTG
Is preventing discussion about salvation through Christ preachy?
Your thread that was closed involved no topic of "discussion" that would be appropriate for this forum. Enforcing the rules of the forum does not constitute "preaching".

Your faith is irrelevant here.

Attempts to share your faith and convince others to join your "pernicious superstition" are considered preaching and against the rules here.

Attempts to demonstrate from the evidence of the relevant texts that a particular interpretation should be accepted are entirely appropriate and welcome here.

Quote:
My last thread was immediately closed because I was not allowed to talk about Jesus Christ.
Your last thread was immediately closed because it contained no rational argument based on evidence but was, instead, a sermon.

Complaining about moderator action within the forum is also against the rules. The appropriate place for that is the IIDB Questions, Problems & Complaints forum.

Amaleq13, BC&H moderator

PS If you decide to engage in an appropriate discussion here, I suggest you choose a single point rather than try to address a broad range of claims as you've done here.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 10:44 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

Quote:
First we must determine whether you understand the Bible's position.
We understand it quite well. Do you?
Do you understand that the Bible is clearly saying some people are going to hell and some are going to the new city in the new earth?
I understand that this is what you think it means. Other Christian denominations would disagree with you.
Quote:
This is a foundation fact of the Bible which is a cornerstone of salvation.
It is not a fact. It is a claim. Demonstrate how this is a fact.
Quote:
Some people don't want to be saved, so since their soul can not be annihilated (being made in the image of God), God then must put them some place.
Since when can an omnipotent being NOT do anything?
Quote:
They can't be where we are going because there is no sin where we are going.
I don't know. Isn't "bearing false witness" a sin?
Quote:
Those who can't be where we are going can't because they prefer to remain in sin.
Right. Sure. Or maybe we just can't stand the self-rightious bloviating.
Quote:
My hope is that there is no preaching here, and a discussion along this line of reasoning that can then take us to the proof itself such as the eyewitness accounts, miracles, sinless selflessness of Christ, Jesus himself saying He is God, which no man has ever been able to match, martyrs in His name, instances of people seeing Him resurrected and so forth.
Except for the tiny detail that there are no actual eyewitness accounts to any of the supposed events...
Quote:
I trust that you are aware we have at least 145 different facts of Christ, 49 earliest documents, even 17 that are secular. 12 of those secular documents speak of His death. 7 even speak of His diety. Nothing in antiquity is so well recorded as you would expect from God.
In a short simple answer...no. There are no contemporary accounts of the events described in the Bible. Everything in the Bible is second-hand or even further accounts from oral history and mythology...written decades after the supposed events.
Avatar is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 10:57 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by one allegiance
I understand what you were saying...I was just wandering why you were surprised to see that you were persecuted for evangilizing, that's all.
Being asked to follow the rules of the forum is persecution?

I remember a cartoon from somewhere. It featured a Christian and a normal guy. The Christian had a stick in his hand and started rapping the normal guy with it. The normal guy asked the Christian to please stop hitting him. The Christian screamed "I'm being persecuted!"

Tell me...why do so many Christians have these persecution fantasies? It's as though they actually want to be persecuted and be made into a martyr for their cause. Why? Self-appointed martyrs are really irritating to be around.
Avatar is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 11:31 AM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

MotG, if this was a Christian forum, and you were an atheist posting in the manner you have posted, I'd be astonished if you were still welcome to post at all.

As far as I am concerned, you are welcome, but to continue to do so it will have to be within the rules of the forum. I like discussions with Christians - and for that matter with people of other religions, and those who may believe in the supernatural without believing in any religion.

Some pointers.

When introducing a topic, think carefully about which you think is the appropriate forum for it. For example, if you are to claim that the existence of people implies that there must be a god that is active in the universe, this forum is not the one to examine this claim in. I'd suggest Philosophy for that.

Try to make your posts - particularly opening posts - address one point at a time. Perhaps you might want to address the nature of hell as described in the bible. You might want to discuss early secular documents which you think give some historicity to Jesus's alleged existence. You might want to discuss whether the bible is inerrant. You might want to discuss whether the alleged eyewitness accounts of Jesus in the bible are in fact eyewitness accounts, and/or whether they are consistent with each other. You might want to attempt to establish the existence of a soul that survives death. All these questions, and others, I've gleaned from just one of your posts in this thread.

Should you start a thread, and get responses - this sounds silly and obvious, but you wouldn't believe how many people don't do this - READ the responses - and reply to what is actually said, not to some preformed idea of what someone who disagrees with you means.

I'd suggest, also, before jumping in at the deep end, reading through some threads which appear to be in your field of interest first. Read some of the sticky posts at the top of each board. Read some of the content of Internet Infidels - that is to say, not the boards.

Then by all means, start topics, or reply within other threads. If the latter, though, try to respond to specific points, rather than jumping in with loads of generalities.

Now - you seem to have an interest in secular documents which allegedly support the truth of the biblical accounts of Christ.

This is just the forum for those.

We've had a recent thread on that very topic.

I'd suggest you read it - perhaps then respond within the thread, or start a new thread on one particular point which you may take issue with.

Welcome to the boards. We tend, most of us anyway, to be polite to, and even respect, those Christians who present their views well, keep to the point, and respond to points made against them. With evidence, logic and preferably both.

Those who ignore points made against them, and keep spouting on about the same things even when they have been clearly refuted, don't do so well.

Good luck.

David B
David B is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.