FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2009, 10:41 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
Default

JP Holding has no qualifications in any Biblical field of study.

TEKTONICS.ORG: EXPOSED!
http://the-anointed-one.com/exposed.html

'James Patrick Holding, the Want-to-Be Apologist'
http://www.infidels.org/library/maga.../4/024jph.html

JP Holding Exposed
http://the-anointed-one.com/search2.htm

'Dishonesty by Robert Turkel (J.P. Holding)'
http://www.discord.org/~lippard/turkeldishonesty.html

A Reply to J. P. Holding
http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...s/holding.html

"Writing James P Holding Off!"
http://debunkingchristianity.blogspo...lding-off.html

"Prove Jesus Existed, Please!"
http://www.truthbeknown.com/holding.htm

James Patrick Holding: Another Apostate With Selective Education
http://www.darrellwconder.com/debate1.html

Do a google for JP Holding and his alt. "Sheila Rangslinger" -

Quote:
"DISCLOSURE FROM ADMIN: "Sheila Rangslinger" was discovered to be a sock puppet identity created by J.P. Holding. Any statements about J.P. Holding in this post were written by J.P. Holding himself."
Quote:
Q. "What are your credentials?"

A. "I have a Masters' Degree in Library Science. What the runs down to is, I'm an expert at looking things up and answering questions"
- JP Holding
JP Holding has never explained how he got that job as prison librarian. WAS HE IN PRISON? IS THAT HOW HE GOT THAT JOB? WHAT WAS HE IN PRISON FOR?
Dave31 is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 12:58 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I don't think that JP Holding has many fans here, but let's not go overboard. The staff of prisons are civil servants, and usually have to have a clean criminal record. There is no indication that JP Holding has a criminal record.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 07:48 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycanthrope View Post
Hi all

I am just wondering if anyone knows of a good website that debunks what is written on tektonics? Mainly at this link http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/copycathub.html

Thanks in advance
The best response to your original question is Acharya's new book CIE - http://www.stellarhousepublishing.co...stinegypt.html

Read the reviews so far at Amazon
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection (or via: amazon.co.uk)

Here's a short video description of the book
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_Zms...e=channel_page
Dave31 is offline  
Old 04-10-2009, 05:26 AM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Azerbaijan
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
JP Holding has no qualifications in any Biblical field of study.
And yet even his opponents concede that he is well-read and knowledgeable.

Seriously, people with better credentials have made worse arguments than he, and people with no credentials at all have regularly made valid observations and valuable contributions.

Holding is silly and dishonest, but that's hardly a result of him never having studied biblical criticism at university.

razly
razlyubleno is offline  
Old 04-10-2009, 09:06 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
Default

And yet, he's not smart enough to include an index in his book which is, apparently, not much more than "a copy/paste re-cap of internet discussions over the last 8 years. The arguments remain unchanged and predictable."

Quote:
"...the book contains no index so it is very inconvenient for use as any sort of reference guide. One has to skim the whole book and/or search the footnote citations at the end of each chapter in hopes of finding whatever one may be looking for. One would think Holding, a former prison librarian with a Masters in library science would've thought of an index. He never does say why he had that prison library job - was he in prison? He won't say.

Third, the book is full of snide comments which comes as no surprise for those who know Holding's style of argument. The book leaves much to be desired for amiability. A real turn-off for many Christian friends & family members I know.

This book inadvertently demonstrates the weakness and ignorance of the anti-mythicist view - they rigidly adhere to taking everything literally, they have no understanding of the concept of mythology.

This book will appeal to those who are to lazy to do their own serious research but I'm sure the outdated/already refuted arguments will still be used in attempts to shore-up the Christian faith, regardless.

Why pay for this book when everything is already available online in forums? It is essentially a copy/paste re-cap of internet discussions over the last 8 years. The arguments remain unchanged and predictable.

I remain unconvinced by the anti-mythicist arguments. After 2,000 years Christians still can't provide convincing evidence for a historical Jesus. But thanks for advertising the mythicist perspective, although poorly presented. This book may best be utilized as inadvertently demonstrating that the anti-mythicist cult still have a lot to learn about the history of disbelief and mythology...."

Shattering Holding's Anti-Mythicist book
Dave31 is offline  
Old 04-10-2009, 09:58 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Azerbaijan
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
And yet, he's not smart enough to include an index in his book which is, apparently, not much more than "a copy/paste re-cap of internet discussions over the last 8 years. The arguments remain unchanged and predictable."
The lack of an index says nothing about intelligence. Your grasping at straws trying to insult the man, and it's not clear why it even matters.

razly
razlyubleno is offline  
Old 04-10-2009, 02:23 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by razlyubleno View Post
...it's not clear why it even matters.

razly
Holding's method is to insult his opponents and make fun of their names. This is a tactic to get their dander up and get everyone in a fighting mood, at which point a rational evaluation of the evidence tends to go out the door.

Which serves his purpose.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.