Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-28-2007, 06:18 AM | #21 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Has anyone asked if the story of Shadrach, Meshach), and Abednego and the fiery furnace are to do with Zarathustra?
|
03-28-2007, 06:29 AM | #22 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
I don't know of any similar story in Zoroastrianism - is there?
|
03-28-2007, 07:10 AM | #23 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
I meant is it another my god is better than your god story, this time between yhwh and Zarathustra's god - fire being the clue. And therefore evidence that they were trying to distinguish what might earlier have been the same thing!
|
03-28-2007, 07:11 AM | #24 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
That's an interesting thought - fire could not harm the Jews metaphorically. But I think Nebuchadnezzar was not a Zoroastrian for one thing - according to the story he worships a golden idol. Zoroastrianism doesn't have idols, only the eternal flame.
|
03-28-2007, 07:16 AM | #25 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
It feels like we may have a very complex collection of gods here! Prime mover god, god is love god, logos god, zeus god (But African or Greek?) yhwh god, ahura mazda god, emperor god, three for the price of one god, a few no god proposers!
It looks like in the Bible we have a very mixed fruit and nut cake of gods! And pretending this is one and the same god is a classic political move! |
03-28-2007, 07:32 AM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
|
I don't think that Yahweh's monotheism need have any precursor found in Persia. There is ample evidence that it is homegrown.
What about the idea that Hebrew monotheism evolved out of an earlier henotheism which in turn came from the original Canaanite polytheism of El the high God and his 70 or so sons? That's not to say that there was no Persian influence, for instance the similarity between the Messiah concept and that of the Zoroastrian Sayoshant is evidence that there was some borrowing, but monotheism in general could have easily been an independent evolution within Canaanite civilization. |
03-28-2007, 07:33 AM | #27 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
I don't really see what is the big deal about monotheism. Living in a tribal framework, a single allegiance god makes perfect sense.
|
03-28-2007, 07:39 AM | #28 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
|
Perhaps monotheism itself is the end result of a logical progression of sorts? And as a result could spring up independently in just about any culture. Aren’t the Cherokee monotheists independent of western influences?
|
03-28-2007, 07:40 AM | #29 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Is not the concept of homegrown in this particular area ridiculous? We are talking about minor kingdoms being continuously trampled over by Medes, Persians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Romans etc etc.
There is monotheism down the road - it was not an isolated island - what is the problem? The Bible even puts the Garden of Eden in the middle of the Persian Empire! |
03-28-2007, 07:57 AM | #30 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
|
Quote:
Quote:
Does anyone know when the Jews first came into contact with Zoroastrian Persia? Any evidence that this happened before the Hebrews were themselves on the way to monotheism? |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|