Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-03-2007, 04:30 PM | #171 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2007, 04:36 PM | #172 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Because if you want to witness to people who hold a different belief it is the highest form of arrogance to tell them "I don't need to read yours but you need to read and believe mine." Because, if all true knowledge comes from god, what should you be afraid of? Most importantly though it could help you to avoid making your faith look foolish and close minded. I'd give you a heck of a lot more credence if you said "Well, yeah I've read the Koran and the Book of Mormon and Darwin. I still hold to my beliefs." Why? Because I have taken the time to examine all those religious texts and scientific texts (and gobs and gobs more) because I wanted to see for myself what they said. So if someone such as yourself could say they have done the same then I wouldn't take them as an arrogant know it all. It would show some humility and intellectual curiosity. I might actually want to debate and discuss with that person because we would have a similar knowledge base. So for a compelling reason: if for no other reason it would give you credibility when you witness for your Lord. |
|
08-03-2007, 04:38 PM | #173 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
|
I'm not afraid of knowledge. I'll read anything if someone gives me a good reason to read it. The problem is ... no one has yet.
|
08-03-2007, 04:50 PM | #174 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 203
|
|
08-03-2007, 04:50 PM | #175 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
|
Quote:
I think you're scared to question your beliefs. It's o.k. to question them. We did we're the better off for it... Take the plunge, Dave. Look your deepest, darkest fears right in the eyes. |
|
08-03-2007, 04:52 PM | #176 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
|
|
08-03-2007, 04:53 PM | #177 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2007, 04:54 PM | #178 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2007, 04:56 PM | #179 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
The way the search for knowlege is done, the way a love of knowlege manifests, is to read everything that doesn't come with a strong rationale for being bypassed. And even that needs to be justified. How can you possibly assert that you have any insight into the 'best' theology, history, geology, physics, astronomy, morality, ethics, theory of knowlege, etc., etc., et bloody cetera, without reading widely and deeply in those fields? You cannot rely [primarily] on paraphrases and assertions by secondary authors as to the truth or even content of the work of primary authors. Still less when the secondary authors have a deomnstrated axe to grind and are demonstrably dishonest and misleading. And even when you read the primary authors, you cannot accept anything on their say-so. If you cannot follow the reasoning from "first principles" or "clear and distinct direct experience", and if you do not know why the rules of deduction are valid, and when and how the rules of induction produce valid results, you have no basis for any claim to knowlege whatsoever. What you have is a fraud. But then, that would be exactly what you have, isn't it? sigh. no hugs for thugs, Shirley Knott |
|
08-03-2007, 04:57 PM | #180 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
Heck, I grew up Jehovah Witness and I read lots of other religious texts -- we were encouraged to so that when we witnessed to others we would understand their beliefs. I mean it says a lot about you when JWs are more open then you! I'm frankly astonished! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|