FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2008, 06:55 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

http://www.sahihalbukhari.com/sps/sbk/

Sahih al Bukhari Volume 6. The Book of the Virtues of the Quraan.

Hadeeth No. 4662 - Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab:

I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Sura which I heard you reciting?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me." I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle has taught it to me in a different way from yours." So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said (to Allah's Apostle),
"I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!" On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him, (O 'Umar!) Recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way as I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way," and added, "Recite, O 'Umar!" I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever (way) is easier for you (or read as much of it as may be easy for you)."
Huon is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:14 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: California, United States
Posts: 382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastula View Post
It's repeating on NGC on 8/12 at 2pm. On my cable at least.
Thanks alot. My cable schedule shows the same time; I'll set my DVR.
elevator is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:34 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
http://www.sahihalbukhari.com/sps/sbk/

Sahih al Bukhari Volume 6. The Book of the Virtues of the Quraan.

Hadeeth No. 4662 - Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab:

I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Sura which I heard you reciting?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me." I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle has taught it to me in a different way from yours." So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said (to Allah's Apostle),
"I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!" On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him, (O 'Umar!) Recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way as I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way," and added, "Recite, O 'Umar!" I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever (way) is easier for you (or read as much of it as may be easy for you)."
Um. But what are we looking at here? What date, and what is its status?

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:53 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

'Umar bin Al-Khattab was the second Sunni Caliph (634 – 644) after Abū Bakr (632-634).
Al Bukhari (810-870) is the guy who saw the guy who saw the guy ... who saw the bear. Looks like Eusebius.
Huon is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 11:50 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

I'm afraid that I think we should be very, very sceptical about this 'quote' until we are rather more clear as to where it comes from etc.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 04:08 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agenda07 View Post
we know that there were about seven variants shortly after the time of Mohammed IIRC, and three different ones are still in widespread use around the world today
Interesting -- tell me more.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
I think I originally read it in Ibn Warraq's Why I am not a Muslim, but Stephen Carr has an article on the Qur'an:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Carr
Uthman had variant copies of the Qur'an destroyed. The very fact that there were variant copies means that there could have been changes to the Qur'an. In addition, Uthman only standardised the consonants. The vowels were only added much later.

For example, the Topkapi Manuscript in Istanbul is devoid of vocalisation. The signs denoting the vocalisation must have been added to the Qur'an after the Topkapi manuscript was written.

This meant that there were 7 readings of the Qur'an

* by Nafi of Medina
* by Ibn Kathir of Mecca
* by Ibn Amir of Damascus
* by Abu Amr of Basra
* by Asim of Kufa
* by Hamza of Kufa
* by Al-Kisai of Kufa

Nowadays it seems that there are two main readings . The one by Asim of Kufa was adopted in the Egyptian edition in 1924 and the reading by Nafi is used in parts of Africa , other than Egypt. The differences between these Qurans are very small. For examp le , there may be a 'fa' rather than a 'wa', but they do exist
It seems I was wrong about the number of contemporary readings though: there are two rather than three (I think the third one I was thinking of is used by a niche sect and is frowned upon by most Muslims).
Agenda07 is offline  
Old 08-12-2008, 06:32 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agenda07 View Post
I think I originally read it in Ibn Warraq's Why I am not a Muslim, but Stephen Carr has an article on the Qur'an:
Thank you for this, but I'm afraid that this is all just hearsay, tho. We need primary sources, I think.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 06:27 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse
I'm afraid that this is all just hearsay.
How many references can you list where what the Gospel writers wrote was not hearsay evidence?

Isn't it true that the vast majority of the Gospels is hearsay evidence?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 07:21 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: California, United States
Posts: 382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyroteuthis View Post
Did anyone else watch this? I was about 2 hours and I thought it was pretty good and interesting. I wonder if someone will try to blow up the History Channel now?
Well, I finally saw it. I thought it was a pretty good program too. It talked about both the good and bad. It talked about how even the Quran (despite its claim to perfection) is subject to ambiguous interpretation, that several groups of faith have emerged, and that believers have a wide range of view on the use of violence and the view on women within the faith. It talks about how much of the violence within the Quran has either contemporary roots or pre-historic roots that predate the mediation of the Quran from God to Muhammad - and about how the Jihadist interpretation is imposed onto the Islamic community by a few powerful clerics; mainly from Saudi Arabia and Iran. It also presented information about the oldest version of the Quran ever found; in which it is apparently quite evident that the Quran has not been preserved in its pure form as allegedly mediated to Muhammad directly from God - and that this version paints less of a militant picture of the faith. The program admits, though, that these text have yet to be properly examined and analyzed.

Of course, whether or not the text's original intention was religious conversion of the world to Islam through military force and social and political integration; doesn't change the fact that the Islamic faith, as it is today, does not appear to be peaceful at all.
elevator is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 07:28 PM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 14,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elevator View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyroteuthis View Post
Did anyone else watch this? I was about 2 hours and I thought it was pretty good and interesting. I wonder if someone will try to blow up the History Channel now?
Well, I finally saw it. I thought it was a pretty good program too. It talked about both the good and bad. It talked about how even the Quran (despite its claim to perfection) is subject to ambiguous interpretation, that several groups of faith have emerged, and that believers have a wide range of view on the use of violence and the view on women within the faith. It talks about how much of the violence within the Quran has either contemporary roots or pre-historic roots that predate the mediation of the Quran from God to Muhammad - and about how the Jihadist interpretation is imposed onto the Islamic community by a few powerful clerics; mainly from Saudi Arabia and Iran. It also presented information about the oldest version of the Quran ever found; in which it is apparently quite evident that the Quran has not been preserved in its pure form as allegedly mediated to Muhammad directly from God - and that this version paints less of a militant picture of the faith. The program admits, though, that these text have yet to be properly examined and analyzed.

Of course, whether or not the text's original intention was religious conversion of the world to Islam through military force and social and political integration; doesn't change the fact that the Islamic faith, as it is today, does not appear to be peaceful at all.
Yes, I thought it was an good program too. Far better than some of the stuff they have on there. I actually downloaded an electronic Quran that is very interesting to read. It's really a nice little program, they should make one for the bible too and maybe Lord of the Rings.

Glad you got to see it too!
Vampyroteuthis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.