FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2007, 10:51 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I agree with the defense. The historical context was different from today. (It would be wrong today for example to bomb Afghanistan into the stone age or kill a couple of hundred thousand Iraqis.)

However, admitting that the historical context was different and you should ignore the genocide opens another problem up. What relevance does the rest of the bible have today and who decides which bits are relevant and which aren't? The whole argument of the bible not being arbitrary, but being a book for all times, is undermined. If you should ignore that bit, why shouldn't you ignore other bits you don't like for ethical or other reasons?
spin
This whole problem originated from the merger for Greek philosophical concepts of God with the anthropomorphic tribal god of the Hebrews.

The Stoics and other Greeks who developed the concept of God as a timeless, perfect, eternal, all knowing, all powerful being who was essentially the prime mover of the universe had already argued against and rejected the anthropomorphic concepts of the Greek gods.

They had completely rejected the Homeric myths and the gods of the temples in favor of Divine Providence.

Then along came Christianity and they merged the advanced philosophical concepts of God from among the Greeks with the old tribal God of the Hebrews, which basically totally undid all of the work that they did in casting out anthropomorphic concepts from their God concept.

Now they were stuck with something even worse. The ideas of Divine Providence, a timeless, all knowing, all powerful prime mover, piggy backed on top of the tribal Hebrew god.

This was inconceivable to Stoics and the like of course, it would have been like telling them that Zeus was the same of Providence, utter rubbish.

So now we have this advanced concept tied into the OT God, which clearly raises all kinds of inconsistencies.
Malachi151 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.