FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Moral Foundations & Principles
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2005, 11:25 PM   #171
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAsimisI
That The Church is authoritative and they are not when it comes to determine what Christianity is and what it is not.
I'm lost. Can you explain this sentence to me?

Oh. Wait a minute. "They" refers to something else besides the Church. I can't seem to find it in this debate. Who is they?

Thanks.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-06-2005, 11:29 PM   #172
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
I'm lost. Can you explain this sentence to me?

Oh. Wait a minute. "They" refers to something else besides the Church. I can't seem to find it in this debate. Who is they?

Thanks.
I was refering to the protestants and other denominations.
Evoken is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:32 AM   #173
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

Quote:
That The Church is authoritative and they are not when it comes to determine what Christianity is and what it is not.
I disagree with this. The only authority that the Catholic Church has is self-proclaimed. The Church does not have the objectivity or clarity to judge what is Christianity any more than Reverend Fred Phelps, Jerry Falwell, Reverend Edward Verjoven, or L. Ron Hubbard. The claim about "keys handed from Jesus" is more tradition and mythology than anything else. Similar claims are made by the Mormons...with just as much evidence.
Avatar is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 01:31 AM   #174
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Proxima Centauri
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAsimisI
In my position both faith and reason go hand in hand, neither a reason only nor a faith only position is acceptable.
Faith and reason do not go hand in hand. This is a fundamental dichotomy. Reason undermines faith; faith comes into play when we have no good reason to believe.
"Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." - John 20:29.

Belief implies a lack of evidentiary support, knowledge (in so far as we can be said to know anything) consists of empirical evidence supporting fact.
The two are fundamentally contradictory.
Awmte is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 05:18 AM   #175
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatar
I disagree with this. The only authority that the Catholic Church has is self-proclaimed. The Church does not have the objectivity or clarity to judge what is Christianity any more than Reverend Fred Phelps, Jerry Falwell, Reverend Edward Verjoven, or L. Ron Hubbard. The claim about "keys handed from Jesus" is more tradition and mythology than anything else. Similar claims are made by the Mormons...with just as much evidence.
Well, then I guess we have reached a dead-end with this don't you think Avatar?

Nice exchange tho. :thumbs:
Evoken is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 09:26 AM   #176
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

*Sigh*

I suppose so.

:thumbs:
Avatar is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:33 AM   #177
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAsimisI
I was refering to the protestants and other denominations.
Since you've never given me a definition of "christian," I may be on shaky ground here, but I'll give it a try anyway.

Since there are some 1200+ different christian denominations, and all seem to claim at least some measure of certitude concerning god, heaven, hell, the after life, etc--many of which views differing radically from one to the other--what suggestions do you have for picking out the right one?

It would seem that doing so is rather important, since one's immortal soul may rest upon making the correct choice.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:00 PM   #178
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
Since you've never given me a definition of "christian," I may be on shaky ground here, but I'll give it a try anyway.

Since there are some 1200+ different christian denominations, and all seem to claim at least some measure of certitude concerning god, heaven, hell, the after life, etc--many of which views differing radically from one to the other--what suggestions do you have for picking out the right one?

It would seem that doing so is rather important, since one's immortal soul may rest upon making the correct choice.
Actually there are more than 30000 denominations

My advice on "picking out the right one"? Seek the one that is rooted in Christ and traces itself back to him, the one that has preserved his message across all generations without comrpomising it. The plethora of denominations you see today start evaporating as you go back in history, continue to go back and you will see how it is the Catholic Church that contains the truth. Once you realize that and move back to the present, everything becomes clear.
Evoken is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:27 PM   #179
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAsimisI
Actually there are more than 30000 denominations

My advice on "picking out the right one"? Seek the one that is rooted in Christ and traces itself back to him, the one that has preserved his message across all generations without comrpomising it.
30,000? Wow! What is there about Christianity that makes for such fragmentation?

As for "tracing itself back to him" this seems to be the point made by virtually every mainstream christian church. If I remember correctly, Luther claimed that the Catholic Church had abandoned Christ long ago, and while I hate to take sides, I do find the Church of Rome a somewhat different institution from the first century agape congegations.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 06:26 PM   #180
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
30,000? Wow! What is there about Christianity that makes for such fragmentation?

As for "tracing itself back to him" this seems to be the point made by virtually every mainstream christian church. If I remember correctly, Luther claimed that the Catholic Church had abandoned Christ long ago, and while I hate to take sides, I do find the Church of Rome a somewhat different institution from the first century agape congegations.
Luther said a lot of things, as do many others. But I am sure you will agree that they are empty claims if they do not bring up their facts to the table

As far as the Catholic Church being "somewhat" different, it is to be expected ,the needs of the first century are different than the needs of today. The Church is a gobal instituton and not a local one, it has way more members than in the first century, so obviously means of better organization had to be applied. But the teachings of Christ have always been faithfully guarded and preserved.
Evoken is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.