Freethought & Rationalism Archive

ravenscape · 07-13-2006, 02:31 AM

It's officially shot down? Or just a lost cause in general?

DougLDS · 07-13-2006, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cat59

and not visible to those not on staff.

well they can't let us peasants see things that aren't good for us. They are all-knowing, all-wise....kind of like their god.

seebs · 07-13-2006, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ravenscape

It's officially shot down? Or just a lost cause in general?

I doubt we will ever be blessed with an "official" answer.

Which isn't to say there isn't one. I just don't think the execs will ever grace us with any kind of rationale.

rigorist · 07-13-2006, 05:03 AM

Straight_Shooter · 07-13-2006, 06:52 AM

TLF was given an OW in the 5th

TLF was given an 2.1 Alert on the 7th

And TLF was given an FSB on the 10th

All for the same post.

Three staff actions by three different staff members, on three different days.

I am beginning to think the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing on a certain team. OYE!

TasManOfGod · 07-13-2006, 06:56 AM

Flesh99
The tats issue IS a CF issue and needs to be sorted out over there . Here is just a convenient place to air our grievances perhaps but CF is the battle ground . Now I am going to suggest that we have a debate over there and ask for the sticky of the summations to remain . If it is accepted on that basis will you do it YES or NO - Let me see what you are made of

Straight_Shooter · 07-13-2006, 06:59 AM

To the thread and all posters,

Please excuse my outburst of anger last night. My husband has informed me after reading it too, that truly most of my actions were anger based and therefore not justified if I allowed my anger to rule my posting style. I caused disruption to the thread, and disharmony last night because of it and for my part in that, I am sorry.

I thought I was justified in my anger because someone accused me of lying. I do not lie. However, justified I may think I might have been, there is not justification for taking that out on the people surrounding me.

To rigorist,
I am sorry if I have caused you any distress, it was not meant in that fashion. I am hoping you will accept my apologies. Next time if I have such a problem I will be more aware and try to take it to private communication.

Lovingly to all

Hugs
Debi

TasManOfGod · 07-13-2006, 07:01 AM

two satanists talking
"I am going to get tattooed"
"What?? ruin your skin and look like one of those stupid Xtians"

Straight_Shooter · 07-13-2006, 07:05 AM

Tas I can offer you a board and make it a public debate. If interested let me know.

Only you and flesh99 would be allowed and I would adjudicate

Lien Shen · 07-13-2006, 07:10 AM

Tas, how many times does CF have to say no?

Come on man, you are really obsessive about it and it's not healthy. You have repeatedly broken the rules about it, and keep attacking people. What you are suggesting is elitist in nature. It's like saying, "Just because you don't read MY bible, you aren't a Christian and no one else is entitled to an opinion otherwise.". It's discriminatory, based on one "percieved" sin and excludes everyone who doesn't agree with you.

There are plenty of free forum software and websites that you can use to create a forum just like you are suggesting, for yourself. Or better yet, you can start a free blog expressing your views, where others can comment AND you can delete the comments you don't agree with that you can even link to your signature or any posts where you think it's relative.

I like you Tas, and when you aren't going off about tattoo's, you can be a really cool person to be around but you go over the top with it. You push so hard that peoples feelings get hurt in the process and it incites all sorts of problems. All Flesh99, and the staff of CF is asking is for you to follow the rules on their turf... like everyone else has to do.

CF will never make forums where people can't openly disagree with others. What is the use of a debate forum if there is no debate to be had?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-13-2006, 02:31 AM	#991
ravenscape Contributor Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: gone gone gone Posts: 12,686	It's officially shot down? Or just a lost cause in general?

07-13-2006, 05:03 AM	#994
rigorist Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The Court of the Weirdo King Posts: 8,818

07-13-2006, 06:52 AM	#995
Straight_Shooter Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Illinios Posts: 957	TLF was given an OW in the 5th TLF was given an 2.1 Alert on the 7th And TLF was given an FSB on the 10th All for the same post. Three staff actions by three different staff members, on three different days. I am beginning to think the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing on a certain team. OYE!

07-13-2006, 06:56 AM	#996
TasManOfGod Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 5,836	Flesh99 The tats issue IS a CF issue and needs to be sorted out over there . Here is just a convenient place to air our grievances perhaps but CF is the battle ground . Now I am going to suggest that we have a debate over there and ask for the sticky of the summations to remain . If it is accepted on that basis will you do it YES or NO - Let me see what you are made of

07-13-2006, 06:59 AM	#997
Straight_Shooter Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Illinios Posts: 957	To the thread and all posters, Please excuse my outburst of anger last night. My husband has informed me after reading it too, that truly most of my actions were anger based and therefore not justified if I allowed my anger to rule my posting style. I caused disruption to the thread, and disharmony last night because of it and for my part in that, I am sorry. I thought I was justified in my anger because someone accused me of lying. I do not lie. However, justified I may think I might have been, there is not justification for taking that out on the people surrounding me. To rigorist, I am sorry if I have caused you any distress, it was not meant in that fashion. I am hoping you will accept my apologies. Next time if I have such a problem I will be more aware and try to take it to private communication. Lovingly to all Hugs Debi

07-13-2006, 07:01 AM	#998
TasManOfGod Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 5,836	two satanists talking "I am going to get tattooed" "What?? ruin your skin and look like one of those stupid Xtians"

07-13-2006, 07:05 AM	#999
Straight_Shooter Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Illinios Posts: 957	Tas I can offer you a board and make it a public debate. If interested let me know. Only you and flesh99 would be allowed and I would adjudicate

07-13-2006, 07:10 AM	#1000
Lien Shen Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: In Meditation. Posts: 668	Tas, how many times does CF have to say no? Come on man, you are really obsessive about it and it's not healthy. You have repeatedly broken the rules about it, and keep attacking people. What you are suggesting is elitist in nature. It's like saying, "Just because you don't read MY bible, you aren't a Christian and no one else is entitled to an opinion otherwise.". It's discriminatory, based on one "percieved" sin and excludes everyone who doesn't agree with you. There are plenty of free forum software and websites that you can use to create a forum just like you are suggesting, for yourself. Or better yet, you can start a free blog expressing your views, where others can comment AND you can delete the comments you don't agree with that you can even link to your signature or any posts where you think it's relative. I like you Tas, and when you aren't going off about tattoo's, you can be a really cool person to be around but you go over the top with it. You push so hard that peoples feelings get hurt in the process and it incites all sorts of problems. All Flesh99, and the staff of CF is asking is for you to follow the rules on their turf... like everyone else has to do. CF will never make forums where people can't openly disagree with others. What is the use of a debate forum if there is no debate to be had?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.