Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Steven Avery · 01-30-2006, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amaleq13

The "appeal" was for any confirmation of the other individual's claim of coherency and was addressed to anyone who had been following the discussion. I question whether that includes someone who sees the appeal but not the discussion the motivated it.

Since your reference had been to a "last debacle", apparently another thread in another place in another time, you are either the Poor Communicator, or deliberately obscuring my simple and sincere question, to what were you referring ?

Shalom,
Steven Avery
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic

Amaleq13 · 01-30-2006, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by praxeus

Since your reference had been to a "last debacle", apparently another thread in another place in another time, you are either the Poor Communicator, or deliberately obscuring my simple and sincere question, to what were you referring ?

Since the links to the "last debacle" are provided in this thread at the beginning of the discussion-in-question and would be readily apparent to anyone who had actually read it prior to asking, one wonders about the sincerity of your interest.

Steven Avery · 01-30-2006, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amaleq13

Since the links to the "last debacle" are provided in this thread at the beginning of the discussion-in-question and would be readily apparent to anyone who had actually read it prior to asking, one wonders about the sincerity of your interest.

Sheesh. The thread was one day old at the point of the "debacle" and "last argumentative clash" statement, and the only URL I see before that was about orthodox icons.

So.... never mind. If you want to play secret code, that is your business .. maybe hatsoff will in the next post will simply speak straight rather than your runaround. All this sidestepping and gamemanship for a simple request for one topic/url/post# of a discussion.

Shalom,
Steven Avery
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic

Amaleq13 · 01-30-2006, 12:28 PM

praxeus,

My apologies. This is the third debacle and contains no links to the previous debacles. You will find the second debacle in Positive evidence for 1st century dates? and the first debacle in Was Mark Jewish?.

Again, I apologize for suggesting you had not bothered to read this thread but I continue to question the sincerity of your interest.

Helpmabob · 01-31-2006, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amaleq13

Since the "finding" of Christ is the same as becoming a Christian which is the same as becoming part of the institution of Christianity, you continue to have no substantive disagreement with what I've been saying.

On the contrary, I have a major bone of contention with this. The problem is that it implies that all who become part of the christian institutions are automatically, redeemed by Christ.

Amaleq13 · 01-31-2006, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helpmabob

On the contrary, I have a major bone of contention with this. The problem is that it implies that all who become part of the christian institutions are automatically, redeemed by Christ.

Nope. You are reading this into what I've said but it is not anything I have actually been suggesting.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

01-30-2006, 12:28 PM	#54
Amaleq13 Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Eagle River, Alaska Posts: 7,816	praxeus, My apologies. This is the third debacle and contains no links to the previous debacles. You will find the second debacle in Positive evidence for 1st century dates? and the first debacle in Was Mark Jewish?. Again, I apologize for suggesting you had not bothered to read this thread but I continue to question the sincerity of your interest.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.