Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-10-2011, 05:56 PM | #481 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
I would say, looking at past 'Christian conduct', and being personally and painfully aware of the level ignorance and hatred harbored by so many Christian 'good-ol boy's' here in the Bible Belt, that Archarya S's paranoia is well founded.
The white Protestant Klan would love to show off it's love for Jebus, God, and Country by lynching and burning her blasphemous atheist ass as an example to all those N***** loving Jewish Catholic commie atheists. |
10-11-2011, 12:05 AM | #482 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
That's classic ... coming from someone whose theories on Christianity are just as bad and lacking in evidence as Acharya's. |
|
10-11-2011, 01:55 AM | #483 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
So your claim is that I am dishonest because after a detailed and dishonest review of all the evidence of the first five centuries my conclusions are diametrically opposed to an HJ? Am I dealing with an Honest Believer who has no certainty but Honesty? |
||
10-11-2011, 06:32 PM | #484 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
As for me, I try to be as honest as I can be. |
||
10-11-2011, 07:01 PM | #485 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
A summary of your argument to date appears to be that people who think there was no HJ are thinking dishonestly while those who think that there was an HJ are thinking as honestly as they can think? That's very impressive rhetoric. Let me know when you're ready to apply this rhetoric to address any items of evidence admissible to the field of ancient history in support of either side. For example the letter Jesus wrote to King Agbar. |
|||
08-10-2012, 12:16 PM | #486 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
|
More mythology in the bible:
Quote:
|
|
08-10-2012, 02:18 PM | #487 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
From Acharya S's "The Christ Conspiracy" (my bold below): Also in Job, a book replete with celestial imagery, the author portrays the Lord as he who “described a circle upon the face of the waters at the boundary between light and darkness. The pillars of heaven tremble . . . his hand pierced the fleeing serpent.” In mythology the heavens are depicted as an “abyss of waters,” so this scripture is reference to the zodiacal circle, “described” or drawn by God. The “boundary between light and darkness” is, naturally, the horizon, and the trembling “pillars of heaven” are the same held up by Samson, the “bright sun.” In addition, “his hand piercing the fleeing serpent” could refer to the Egyptian god Set/Seth, the constellation of Serpens, or the sky itself; however, this last part could also be translated as the “crooked serpent” who does not flee but is formed by the Lord’s hand, representing Scorpio. Of this mysterious and clearly astrological work attributed to Job, Anderson says, “... the whole book is a complete description of the Masonic ceremonies or Egyptian Masonry, or trial of the dead by Osiris...”If the theme of cataclysm (also found in the Samson solar myth) can be found in Japan, Central America, the Maoris and Finland, then it was either spread by one of the global advanced cultures, or it was the result of post-cataclysm (local) cultures recording a world-wide cataclysm. Is that reasoning sound? |
||
08-12-2012, 10:00 AM | #488 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
|
Hello GakuseiDon, according to Acharya and her Errata page she has not agreed with Velikovskian David Talbott for like 10 years now. I don't think she ever really did adhere to that in the first place; as explained to you many times before, she included some topics in the last chapter of that book just to bring up as topics for further investigation.
Also, her new 2nd edition to Christ Conspiracy has grown considerably and because of that it will apparently not include a few chapters, one being: "Evidence of an Ancient Global Civilization" http://freethoughtnation.com/forums/...p=23849#p23849 Rather than constantly trying to distort what she has actually said for like 8 years now, perhaps it's time for a new obsession? |
08-12-2012, 11:52 AM | #489 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Dave31, thanks for the links. I'm careful to quote Acharya S. If she has changed her mind based on new evidence, then it is to her credit. But she doesn't appear to have changed her mind on the "ancient advanced global civilization"; rather, as she states: "There is much new material".
I don't think you understand the importance of the "ancient advanced global civilization" idea to her theories expressed in "The Christ Conspiracy". As you know, she does stress the similarities of religious ideas throughout the world. For example, from "The Christ Conspiracy" (my bold): Furthermore, the very ancient Buddhist religion is found in many parts of the world, as noted. As Robertson says, “Singularly suggestive of Buddhist contacts . . . are a number of Mexican sculptures; many figures of Quetzalcoatl are practically identical with the established type of Buddha.” As we have seen, the religion of Quetzalcoatl is nearly identical in many aspects to that of Jesus, with a savior born of a virgin who is tempted and fasts 40 days, and who dies and is to return in a Second Coming...Now, note that there aren't just religious/cultural similarities. Acharya S points out **linguistic** similarities between cultures around the world as well. She finds these similarities as both "startling" and "demonstrated". As she writes (my emphasis below): The linguistical/etymological evidence that connects the world is startling and has been demonstrated throughout this book. Mainly, however, our analysis has been confined to the “Old World.” We have already seen some dazzling examples of how the languages of both worlds are related. As a basic example, the word “Mama” and/or “Ma” meaning mother is found in numerous cultures around the globe. A more complex etymological similarity can been found in the Mexican name Mexitli or Mesitli, meaning “the Anointed One,” obviously related to the Egyptian Messu and the Hebrew Messiah. In Maya, “balaam” is a priest, while in Hebrew it is the name of a prophet. There are in fact numerous correlations between the ancient Mexican language and that of the Middle East, including the Sumerian. Indeed, the Mexican culture has close parallels in art, religion and language to Sumer as well....While one might look at the sun and observe it entering the zodiac at 30° and so conclude that one of the characteristics of the “Sun of God” is that he begins his ministry at “age” 30 (which Acharya S states below), you don't look up at the sun and get the New World word "Mexitli", the Egyptian word "Messu" and the Hebrew word "Messiah". So how to explain the similarities? Are they significant or are they mere coincidence? On the characteristics of the "sun god": from "The Christ Conspiracy" (not a complete list) (my bold below): Within the Sun Book or Holy Bible was incorporated by such priestcraft the most consolidated version of the celestial mythos ever assembled: the story of the “son of God.”... Jesus Christ and the others upon whom he is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the gospel fable is merely a repeat of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens... |
08-12-2012, 12:41 PM | #490 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle east
Posts: 829
|
Quote:
According to me, (and no one else "in this dark world and wide"--to quote, and honor, John Milton, biblical scholar), the Greek word Μεσσίας, (source of our English word "messiah",) in turn, originates NOT with the Hebrew word "mashiakh" (i.e. anointed), but rather with the Hebrew word "moshiah"--saviour. My argument is based on two points: 1. phonemic, 2. historical. Neither one is accepted by the cognoscenti of the forum, but, nevertheless, they will agree with me, I think, that "messiah" is not Hebrew. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|