Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-02-2009, 01:08 PM | #101 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wherever God takes me
Posts: 5,242
|
Quote:
Let's say you ask a girl out and she says no. Do you yell and scream and beg her until she goes out with you? Or do you move on to a different girl? |
|
07-02-2009, 04:49 PM | #102 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
For example, see the Nag Hammadi Codices. |
|
07-02-2009, 06:43 PM | #103 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
|
Quote:
Or are you going to argue that earthquakes are a result of free will? |
||
07-03-2009, 03:45 AM | #104 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
|
Of course! how stupid of me. Earthquakes are the Earth's choice of free will. If the planet wishes to have an earthquake, then an earthquake it shall have. You see, it's called free will.
Apologists have tried every trick in the book to explain the evil that abounds in the universe, proving beyond a shadow of doubt that a benevolent god cannot exist. The escapism to ''free will'' is one of many excuses and the most absurd. |
07-03-2009, 04:15 PM | #105 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,001
|
Actually I like this idea.. nevermind the gospels were written in a completely different language than Jesus spoke.
Now the question becomes why did Jesus write 4 gospels with so many contradictions? Why did he write them so that it looks like some of them are based on other gospels, but are slightly changed to change what the other one says? They can't even agree on the basics of salvation or the nature of Jesus! I think it's another kind of test... God created the tree and then told them to not eat of the tree knowing full well they would, and knowing that they didn't know good from evil so they wouldn't know eating from the tree was bad. Jesus wrote the four gospels himself, but the test is we're supposed to know which one is the right one. You have to believe Matthew and only Matthew otherwise it's like the fruit all over again. ETA: Oh, we failed the test since we've been using all 4, that's why there's so many denominations, because they're all trying to harmonize the 4 gospels. |
07-04-2009, 01:15 AM | #106 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
|
But Mathew, or whoever was the author had the gospel of Mark in front of him when he/they wrote Mathew. So perhaps Mark is the true gospel written by jeebus.
|
07-04-2009, 03:40 AM | #107 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
|
||
07-04-2009, 07:03 AM | #108 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
|
Quote:
Given the premise Jesus wrote (poofed into existence) the four accepted gospels at the same time as he was appearing to Paul, why didn't he make their accounts jive? Why on earth would Paul's magic Jesus need to explain the words of the Earthbound Jesus (especially where Paul says to do the opposite of what Jesus said)? |
|
07-05-2009, 03:41 AM | #109 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2009, 11:44 AM | #110 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|