Freethought & Rationalism Archive

gregor · 02-26-2007, 07:15 PM

Naboo
Thanks for the link - it's said more in a half-page than all of your blather to date. I'll accept you as an accredited scientist the same was that I do Kurt Wise, Jon Sarfarti, the DI clan, flat earthers, ICR, and graduates from Patriot University.

Nazaroo · 02-26-2007, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregor

Naboo
Thanks for the link - it's said more in a half-page than all of your blather to date. I'll accept you as an accredited scientist the same was that I do Kurt Wise, Jon Sarfarti, the DI clan, flat earthers, ICR, and graduates from Patriot University.

As a Jew, a democrat, and a physicist, I don't think they'd let me join.

jgibson000 · 02-26-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nazaroo

And you wonder if Ehrman should take ME seriously...

No. Nothing to wonder at. It's clear that no one should take you seriously.

Quote:

If Ehrman ever does take me seriously, I'll have to stop taking myself seriously.

So you admit that there's nothing in what you write that Ehrman should find worthy of serious consideration.

Glad you've seen the light.

JG

Nazaroo · 02-26-2007, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgibson000

No. Nothing to wonder at. It's clear that no one should take you seriously.

What about your nonsense on 'courage'? Are we supposed to take you seriously?

If so, perhaps you can explain your Medieval chivalry to the rest of us.

Should I also be laying my coat across puddles for effeminate professors, to keep their delicate feet from becoming damp?

Quote:

So you admit that there's nothing in what you write that Ehrman should find worthy of serious consideration.

Quite correct. His IQ level is not up to the comprehension and attention span required. He is best left generating soundbites for the American masses on the COLBERT REPORT. There are treatments for ADD, but he is too old to benefit from them.

Quote:

Glad you've seen the light.

JG

Still bitter because I banned you from TC-Alt List?

Roller · 02-26-2007, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgibson000

Shades of the Yuri Kuchinsky criterion for determining the truth of what one writes! "Nobody has found anything wrong with what I've written"!

Problem with this criterion is that it entails not only delusions of grandeur, but also egregious petitio principii in its assumptions that those whom one claims as having been "unable to find anything wrong" with what one has written

(a) have actually read what one has written (did you ever send it directly to Ehrman? Have you ever had the courage of your convictions and tried to get it published in an academic journal or other professional venue?) or,

(b) if they have, that they think (as scholars do of Yuri Kuchinsky's "published" "work") that it actually warrants any response.

Have you sent your "work" directly to Erhman, etc.? If not, why not? Have you ever submitted it for publication anywhere other than forums on the internet? If so, where?

JG

It does remind me of the creationist cry: "No one wants to debate us! They are scared!"

jgibson000 · 02-26-2007, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nazaroo

Still bitter because I banned you from TC-Alt List?

Not at all. And never was. But since it was "Mr. Scrivener" who did the banning, thanks for clearing up the nonsense that "he's" been posting about how "he" is not "Nazaroo".

In any event, I suppose you are not going to answer my questions about why it is that you've never spent Ehrman & Co. your critiques of his work and why you've never submitted any of your work to be published in academic journals or other professional venues.

JG

Nazaroo · 02-26-2007, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgibson000

Not at all. And never was. But since it was "Mr. Scrivener" who did the banning, thanks for clearing up the nonsense that "he's" been posting about how "he" is not "Nazaroo".

In any event, I suppose you are not going to answer my questions about why it is that you've never spent Ehrman & Co. your critiques of his work and why you've never submitted any of your work to be published in academic journals or other professional venues.

JG

What Happened on TC-AltList <-- Click here

Its no secret on TC-Alt List that Willker banned Mr. Scrivener and deleted his scholarly posts on Willker's TC-List, so that Ehrman (a member of that list) would not be offended.

Ehrman chose not to respond to the criticisms of at least 3 different textual critics, and he knows all about what Mr.Scrivener posted in his analysis of Ehrman's performances.

This is because we DON'T delete messages on TC-Alt List, and all your dirty laundry sits there still also.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TOTO;

We discourage all participants from bringing their history of conflicts with other poster on other lists to this forum.

What am I to do with this? Mr. Gibson is continuing to ignore the advice of the moderator, so I suppose I must have the right to respond to this nonsense.

This is exactly what got him banned from TC-Alt-List.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

02-26-2007, 07:15 PM	#21
gregor Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Texas Posts: 932	Naboo Thanks for the link - it's said more in a half-page than all of your blather to date. I'll accept you as an accredited scientist the same was that I do Kurt Wise, Jon Sarfarti, the DI clan, flat earthers, ICR, and graduates from Patriot University.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.