Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-21-2006, 07:53 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,450
|
Thanks guys.
I continue to be astonished at the flimsiness of arguments for the resurrection. I keep having to remind myself when listening to Christians like W.L. Craig "it's the 21st Century, it's the 21st Century...." Prof. |
11-21-2006, 08:07 PM | #12 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
My point is that the story of Stephen's death is well known among evangelicals and they will immediately catch the error. The author makes some good points, but seems to be lacking basic knowledge. |
|
11-22-2006, 12:41 AM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
"Lynch" is defined as kill without legal sanction. In the US, it implicitly refers to hanging by an extra-legal mob, but that is not a necessary part of lynching.
This appears to be an accurate description of Stephen's death - Acts 6-7 says that Stephen was brought before the Sanhedrin in what appears to be a legal process, but he was stoned by an angry mob reacting to his speech, not by order of the Chief Priest. |
11-22-2006, 01:17 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
The Gospel of Peter is not a Gnostic work, and it does not portray Jesus' resurrection as non-physical.
|
11-22-2006, 06:21 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
|
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 07:08 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
|
11-23-2006, 12:09 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oldsmar,Florida
Posts: 228
|
amazing hat trick of transcendentalists to dominate Western Civilization and much of the world with nothing more than a 2,000 year old resurrection myth!!!
|
11-23-2006, 01:31 AM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kahaluu, Hawaii
Posts: 6,400
|
Well, some sort of hat trick was going to emerge. xianity happened to win out. There were lots of reasons, most of which had little to do with whether or not Jesus lived or was resurrected, whether or not the apostles lived or were martyred. The single greatest boost was Constantine. Had any of many events turned against him, the world would be a different place. Probably the biggest contributory events to Constantine were his mother was xian and for both he and his peer in the East, Licinius, the deathbed acclimation of the eastern Emperor, Galerius, who fell ill and became convinced it was the curse of the xian god. They legitimized xianity.
But just like evolution, something had to win out. But just like evolution, it wasn't divinely assisted. |
11-23-2006, 02:35 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
|
Maybe the question could be decided by a head-count. How many Jews and Moslems and miscellaneous pagans have died over the centuries for BELIEVING Jesus was NOT resurrected compared with the numbers who have died for believing he was.
|
11-23-2006, 06:27 AM | #20 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
I don't know if people are aware of the practice in 'soap operas' of 'killing characters'. That is , if you want to remove a character from a particular role, during one of the episodes, you show a scene where that particular character 'dies'. That character or actor is, in general, not seen in subsequent episodes.
Now, when I read and study the NT,, it appears to me that the characters (apostles) ,or should I say actors, were 'killed' so that they could no longer appear in any further episodes. It is clear that the Jesus story has not been able to be verified, and the apostles are virtually unknown, it was therefore prudent for the authors to have them 'killed' as soon as possible, lest by making them appear to live long, their fraud be discovered. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|