spin

You sadly made the faux pas.

Yet another example of you showing how ironic you were citing Rom 2:1.

I don't deign to give it the value you are attempting to. I merely pointed out that the Pharisees saw it as a break of the sabbath law. The rest is up to the shyster.

You're sadly misguided into thinking it needs to be answered. You and your albatross.

Whoa, shyster alert!!!!

This appears to be purely an anti-Semitic bowel movement.

You simply don't show any understanding of the sabbath. The day before was called the "day of preparation" for a reason.

Besides, the `Am ha-Aretz were left to their own deeds.

Albatross! Fresh albatross!

Solo

Repeating an idiotic tangent does not make it any less idiotic. It simply confirms the idiocy. :huh:

Best,
Jiri

sotto voce

:grin: I'll leave you to your dream world on the ocean bottom.

sotto voce

That's not a nice thing to say about Herr Ratzinger. Just because he calls himself Bent Edict doesn't mean that he's a tangent. Just that he's as far from BC&H as it is possible to get.

spin

Hmm, great comeback. Makes as much sense as the rest of your palaver. Upshot is, sotto voce posts, reaction is "shyster alert!" It's the equivalent of noting sotto voce's lips moved. (It's a perversion of an old joke: how do you know when a lawyer is lying? -- its lips move. Of course, it's not lying in your case: it's just shystering.) Here's what it will look like:

outhouse

False


different oral traditions from different geographic locations.

Later additions but still came from sources that may have been close to jesus then paul as paul knew very little of HJ.



Its evident the gospels were never dependant on the epistles.




You know require special pleading




the rest of your post was drivel and not worth responding

spin

Yawn.



Psychic at work.

"that may", ie cluelessness at work. That Paul knew nothing tangible about a historical Jesus doesn't help your sorry ass.


Bald assertion. Fact, matey, not assertion. You have such empty rubbish so often.

Amusing. Explain the special pleading from reading the text of Paul our earliest writer for what he indicates.

You've proven yourself incapable of serious response above, so I couldn't expect you to say anything better.

rlogan

Muhammed Ali had sparring partners that were world champion quality themselves. Like Larry Holmes. The problem with sparring nincompoops is that they drag you down to their level.

aa5874

In Galatians the Pauline writer SPECIFICALLY claimed he PERSECUTED the FAITH he NOW, NOW, NOW preached.

Galatians 1:23 KJV What ever Paul NOW preached what he PERSECUTED in Galatians.

Galatians 2:20 KJVGalatians 3:11 KJVWhy is it so difficult for people to even acknowledge that the Pauline claimed he PERSECUTED the FAITH that he PRESENTLY PRESENTLY Preached???

In the very Galatians, the Pauline writer CLAIMED that there were APOSTLES Before Him.

Littlejohn

"..Setting Paul aside, doesn't all of the early evidence we have about what the early Jewish Christian groups thought about Jesus show that they regarded him to have been a Jewish man who walked the earth?.."

The 'GIUDEI-CRISTIANI' (Jewish-Christians) had NOTHING to do with Jesus of Nazareth, nor with 'jesuan-gnosticism' (the REAL 'εκκλησια' founded by Jesus) and nor even with the 'catto-cristianesimo' (catholic-christianity), now simply called 'Christianity'.

The 'Judeo-Christian' cult, in fact, was strictly related to Orthodox Judaism, from which only differed about the vision and consideration with respect to the 'Messiah' awaited. According to Orthodox Judaism, the Messiah has not yet been revealed, nor the time of Jesus, nor in the current ones (Jews still waiting for his 'coming'), on the contrary, according to the 'Jewish-Christian', which structure of worship and doctrine was developed in Antioch (see Acts of the Apostles), presumably between 85-90 (and however BEFORE the famous rabbinical synod which was held in the town of Jamnia in the early years 90), the expected Messiah one had already shown into world, but was not recognized because of its characteristics and its 'mission' clearly contrasted with those of the imaginary common sense of Orthodox Jews.

As we clearly shows the current rabbinic literature (Talmud and other), the Jewish contemporaries of Jesus of Nazareth believed him a man and NOT a god, with the aggravating circumstance of being a 'magician Exorcist' and a traitor of the Jewish people. (it was a POLITICAL accusation and NOT one religious!). .

We find the charge of 'treason' against Jesus, even in the Mandaean literature. However, the concept of betrayal that was to the basis of accusations that the 'Mandaeans/nasurei' turned to Jesus, was DIFFERENT from the one on which were based instead the charges of Orthodox Jews. Understand and frame historically accusations of treason that 'nasurei' (now 'Mandaeans') addressed to Jesus, means projecting deeply themselves into what was the REAL dynamic that led to 'gesuanismo', for first, and subsequently to Catholic Christianity ...


Littlejohn

.