Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-13-2008, 12:03 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
|
Thank you Dave, very interesting post today.
Two questions. 1. Is your quote above from this book (or via: amazon.co.uk) or this one (or via: amazon.co.uk)? 2. Am I then, to understand that you regard the "fact" (reference?) that Hadrian built a second pool, perhaps near the site of the first one (?), as having resolved definitively the question of an early date for authorship of gJohn (i.e. prior to 70CE)--at least regarding John 5:2? I do not understand how the quote above, from the Princeton scholar, addresses the other underlying question: validity of the "received" versions of the Greek texts, versus the three "oldest" extant versions, Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, and Alexandrine. We need a careful word by word analysis, I believe, from each of these three oldest papyrus docs, (if they contain this portion of John?), juxtaposed to the newer versions, in order to understand more clearly this second problem, something of a controversy from the original post, a couple of years ago..... |
12-13-2008, 01:07 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
|
Thanks avi.
1. The quote is attributed to Dr. James Charlesworth's "Reinterpreting John" from the Bible Review of Feb. 1993 online. 2. Regardless of the manuscript one has, if this part of John is in there and it's discussing a building that didn't exist until AFTER 135 CE then, that scripture could not have been written until after 135 CE. Also, this is cited & discussed in Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of The Christ (or via: amazon.co.uk) page 231-2. |
12-13-2008, 01:24 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
|
|
12-14-2008, 05:54 AM | #14 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
If so, then the five porches or porticoes are older than Jesus and go back to the late BCE construction of the second pool. If the five porches or porticoes refer to shrines for Asclepius they would probably be later than Jesus (although a small group of scholars believe that the pool was already devoted to Asclepius before 70 CE). However the identification of the five porches or porticoes specifically with Asclepius worship seems a little speculative. Andrew Criddle |
||
12-14-2008, 06:26 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
|
Quote:
And the Qumran Copper Scroll seems to attest to Judean knowledge of the pool before 70 CE (cf. A. Wolters “Copper Scroll,” in Dictionary of New Testament Background [ed. Craig A. Evans and Stanley E. Porter; Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2000] 215. See, too, E.J. Vardaman, “The Pool of Bethesda,” Biblical Research 14 [1963]: 27-29; J. Wieand, "John V. 2 and the Pool of Bethesda," NTS, 12 [1966)], pp. 392-404, esp. pp. 394-395). Jeffrey |
|
12-14-2008, 06:57 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
|
|
12-14-2008, 07:10 AM | #17 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
|
Quote:
But Josephus is aware of the area in Jerusalem known as Bethesda. See War 2. 328. Quote:
Jeffrey |
|||
12-17-2008, 10:46 AM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
|
It says here that in the earlier myth he had two daughters, while in the later myth they numbered FIVE. The building around 135 CE would be representative of the LATER myth, as would be appropriate.
I see nothing here about six daughters. As we know, MYTHS CHANGE. The Dictionary of Classical Mythology Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|