FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2006, 12:12 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
I understand quite well but there are still fundamental secularists. Some call them militants but they are fundamentalists as well and Dawkins would easily be considered one.
Relativism is an excuse for not wanting to evaluate the evidence. Believe me it's quite possible to be wrong. When someone points out your faith-based mental masturbation for what it is, labeling him a "militant" (whatever that means in this context) and hiding your head in the sand doesn't change anything.
Ravear is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 12:32 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, California USA
Posts: 5,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
I understand quite well but there are still fundamental secularists. Some call them militants but they are fundamentalists as well and Dawkins would easily be considered one.
I agree with you singletrack1. I think Dawkins is a very intelligent guy who makes some good points, but he's so inflexible and antagonistic that he's actually doing more harm than good. Like the old saying goes, "You catch a lot more flies with honey".
Clete is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 02:28 PM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 219
Default

In my opinion, the root of all evil is fear.
glooper23 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 02:39 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gold coast plain, sea, scrubland, mountain range.
Posts: 20,955
Default

Well, talking about superstition is important. But you do have to probably offer people something to replace that, for the rabble to be able to tolerate their jonesing for hope and community. And atheism has not done that well yet.
capsaicin67 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 03:47 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by capsaicin67
Well, talking about superstition is important. But you do have to probably offer people something to replace that, for the rabble to be able to tolerate their jonesing for hope and community. And atheism has not done that well yet.
And why should it? Why it's it so important to coddle someone who can't accept the truth?
Ravear is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 03:49 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gold coast plain, sea, scrubland, mountain range.
Posts: 20,955
Default

Quote:
And why should it? Why it's it so important to coddle someone who can't accept the truth?
Oh, it doesn't have to. Just saying---there is a fine line between coddling and offering sustenance. And saying that there are going to be inherent limitations on acceptance of atheism so long as that is the case. That's all. A lot of people want community, and supports, and values guidance, networking and mate finding and casseroles...and always will. And religions are clubs that offer shortcuts to those.
capsaicin67 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:40 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
What Mr. Dawkins seems to forget is that, regardless if God is a fictional character or not, it is people who are causing, and have caused, pain, suffering, and death upon other people. No God required and for many of the perpetrators God was not a motivating factor.
What you keep forgetting is a god idea is the very reason behind most of that destruction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
Have Christians killed other Christians because of very slight differences of beliefs? Yes, and the 30 years war would have told you that without the brilliance of Richard Dawkins. Have Muslims killed Christians, Hindus killed Muslims, and random people killed random people in the name of some higher truth or power: yes.
Yes, revealing god and religion once again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
Does demonizing belief in a higher power, force, entity, or purpose behind the universe do *anything* to further world peace?
Yes, but it should have been delt with thousands of years before now.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:42 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
Maybe Dawkins should realize that it is fundamentalism, in ALL its forms, that are the threats of the future and possibly the root of all evils.
Where do you think fundamentalism came from?

Quote:
Originally Posted by singletrack1
Instead of complaining about what has caused deaths in the present and the past, maybe preparing for the future is a better option
That is the whole idea you seem to miss.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:42 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 603
Default

It will probably be out on MVGroup or UKNova quite soon after airing.
MilitantModerate is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:42 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clete
I think Dawkins is a very intelligent guy who makes some good points, but he's so inflexible and antagonistic that he's actually doing more harm than good. Like the old saying goes, "You catch a lot more flies with honey".
You eliminate the chance of any flies by properly disposing of all wastes.
sharon45 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.