FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2005, 07:58 AM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 2,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy Hobbit Fancier
Okay, I own up.

This thread was particularly useful in determining your "personality traits" and therefore your star sign.

I just thought I would point this out before kaleidoscope does the same search as I did ("QoS" and "birthday") and then claims that it was her astrology that determined the answer, rather than her searching abilities...
You really had us all fooled for a second.











MollyMac is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 11:40 AM   #102
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chapka
Okay. I'm not sure, but are you saying there has never been a war where one country has defeated a country whose captial, or territory, lies to the north of it? Because historically, you're just wrong. The Norman Conquest and the battle of Hastings spring to mind, wherein the Normans beat the English; also, the Second War of Scottish Independence, the Rough Wooing, and the Jacobite Rebellion, in all of which England defeated Scotland; the Israeli invasion of its northern neighbor Lebanon in 1982; the War of 1812 (perhaps more of a draw); the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan; the Russo-Japanese War; the repeated repulsions of Indian invasion and/or occupying forces by Sri Lanka; Argentina's May Revolution against Spain; the Gallic wars; and, arguably, the recent war between Ethiopia and its northern neighbor Eritrea.
Funny how what is supposed to sway me to the other side, yanks me further away. Well, we know the US was involved with Israeli/Lebanon, definitely involved with Soviet/Afghan, i'm sure we have a hand in India/SriLanka and Ethiopia/Eritrea. Now I have a better understanding why we have to mess around all over the world. If the US is at your backing, guess who's going to win (with our muscle in Alaska) or so history will say so? The others, um, if you buy into, and I know I do, that the US did not win indepence, this is a very big lie and it wouldn't be the only one.
kaleidescope is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 11:58 AM   #103
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

And that's something that no one would ever have figured out from my posts, PHF, because the dominant traits of Pisceans are supposed to be gentleness, romanticism, passivity and mysticism. Linda Goodman, for instance, goes into details about how Piscean girls are these delicate, feminine wisps who achieve childlike happiness on knowing they have a big strong man who's going to take charge of their lives.

So not me.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:06 PM   #104
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy Hobbit Fancier
Okay, I own up.

This thread was particularly useful in determining your "personality traits" and therefore your star sign.

I just thought I would point this out before kaleidoscope does the same search as I did ("QoS" and "birthday") and then claims that it was her astrology that determined the answer, rather than her searching abilities...
Think what you will, but last night, without looking at Q of S past posts, piscean did come to my mind.
And I had a personal revelation: as i feel a kaleidescope represents me much better than a photo ever could, i came to a wondrous conclusion: planets, stars and such in space are a physical expression/projection of their corresponding gods. modern astrologists collect data and attempt to come to a conclusion with the data, so this does leave room for mistakes. gods can look at the sky and interpret what is there as easy as a mere mortal can read an easy book. ancient astrology (the real thing) is from gods. how much have the gods allowed us to know?? i know the bodies in the sky help to guide us through our lives all ready predetermined which is kicked off at our time of birth. but we can't talk to planets and such, we can talk to God and gods. Planets don't perform miracles. God and gods do.
kaleidescope is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:09 PM   #105
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heurismus
Well for the death of a father I suppose the probability of such an event occuring at my age is far greater, but you 'assumed' wrongly and 'Status Quo' I think isn't a strong term to use in this application, same old chords but groovy to head bang to I suppose.

But no I haven't seen one and I have checked when Damien and I were transposed in the womb and I actually first saw light at 0855. I'll check the longitude if you want. This really should be interesting, seriously. (don't forget the jokes )
oh great and you do have me on my toes, now i have to check you against my husband 10-29-59, has a twin sister.
kaleidescope is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:25 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaleidescope
Funny how what is supposed to sway me to the other side, yanks me further away. Well, we know the US was involved with Israeli/Lebanon, definitely involved with Soviet/Afghan, i'm sure we have a hand in India/SriLanka and Ethiopia/Eritrea. Now I have a better understanding why we have to mess around all over the world. If the US is at your backing, guess who's going to win (with our muscle in Alaska) or so history will say so? The others, um, if you buy into, and I know I do, that the US did not win indepence, this is a very big lie and it wouldn't be the only one.
I honestly have no idea what you're saying here.

You made a statement, as far as I could tell, about the northernmost country having won every war in history. I presented counterexamples.

You've attempted to rebut my counterexamples, as far as I can tell, by claiming that the United States was involved, which seems irrelevant. You also conveniently ignore the fact that many of the wars I cited, such as the first-millenium-C.E. invasions of Sri Lanka by various southern Indian kingdoms, occurred well before the United States existed, and that in others, such as the Russo-Japanes war, that United States had little or no influence, or was actually supporting the losing side.

Now you say, with respect to these examples, that "this is a big lie and it wouldn't be the only one." Are you arguing that all of history is unreliable? If so, how can you support your viewpoint from history? If not, what on earth are you saying?

The fact is, there are some wars where the northernmost country has lost. I really don't see why that's controversial. Nor do I see the point of it in this thread, unless you intended to support your argument that there's no such thing as coincidence by pointing out what appears to be a coincidence.
chapka is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 02:23 PM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen of Swords
And that's something that no one would ever have figured out from my posts, PHF, because the dominant traits of Pisceans are supposed to be gentleness, romanticism, passivity and mysticism. Linda Goodman, for instance, goes into details about how Piscean girls are these delicate, feminine wisps who achieve childlike happiness on knowing they have a big strong man who's going to take charge of their lives.
Yep, that's you to a tee.

Own up, admit it, underneath that hard, cynical exterior you have a soft centre trying to get out.

Oh... wait a minute... the soft centre appears to be made of napalm...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 08:03 PM   #108
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaleidescope
Think what you will, but last night, without looking at Q of S past posts, piscean did come to my mind.
Interesting how it only did so around the time my sun sign was clearly spelled out, and not when I asked you to guess it. Oh, I have no doubt that piscean came to your mind. Along with aquarian, arian, taurean, cancerean, scorpian, capricornean, etc. It must have been so very difficult to guess the correct one.

One more piece of evidence that astrology doesn't work.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 10:47 PM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Cool

There's this thing called 'precession of the equinoxes'.

The Earth wobbles as it rotates, very slowly, like a spinning top. Every sixteen thousand years approximately, the poles trace out circles on the sky.

Now, the traditional sun signs were set by an ancient civilization- Chaldeans, maybe?- I forget- but anyway, long enough ago that the poles have moved. This means that the position of the sun at the equinoxes has moved, too- and so we are all *actually* born under the sign *preceding* the ones your horoscope says. I was born Oct. 11, but instead of a Libra, I'm actually a Virgo. A Pisces is really an Aquarius.

I just love to lay this on believers in astrology. Blows their minds. It may be that some understand this, but none that I've ever met have.
(And it may be that someone else has posted this on this thread, but I've only read the last page, so...)
Jobar is offline  
Old 01-12-2005, 12:48 AM   #110
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen of Swords
Linda Goodman is convinced that there are two undiscovered planets out there - Pan-Horus, which supposedly relates to Taureans, and Vulcan, where Mr. Spock comes from. OK, I was kidding about that last part. Vulcan is the Virgos' planet.
Though I've found some Linda Goodman tribute pages like this one and this one and even a whole Linda Goodman forum, I have not been able to find out:
1) how she predicted those planets
2) whether she predicted anything about their orbits

Since according to astrology, the planets' influences are affected by their directions relative to the zodiac and to other planets, one might be able to work backward from their influences to their positions -- and ultimately, their orbits. Much as Leverrier and Bessel had done.

But it seems that Ms. Goodman has been operating on a principle of a different planet for each zodiac sign. Which makes me think:

Ms. Goodman, I served with Urbain Leverrier. I knew Urbain Leverrier. Urbain Leverrier was a friend of mine. Ms. Goodman, you're no Urbain Leverrier.

Despite my knowledge of astronomy, I have had little interest in constellation lore -- the stars seem like a big Rorschach test to me more than anything else.

And the planets are very unlike their astrological attributes, which are derived from their Greco-Roman-deity identifications. Did any astrologer ever predict what the planets are really like?

Mars having an almost Earthlike surface, though a cold and geologically dead one.

Venus having a rather hellish surface, 470 C / 900 F, under a perpetually cloudy sky.

And my Sun Sign is Libra, though I don't seem to fit what Ms. Goodman describes about Libra men.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.