FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2005, 09:15 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Could you show where the Messiah was supposed to be a Nazerite?
Luke 1:26-27?

It may be argued that Zechariah and Elizabeth 'were' the town of Nazareth and Mary was the womb of the Lord after he had replaced the reproach of Elizabeth among men = peace and quiet in the valley.

The reproach of Elizabeth ended the enmity between the serpent (eve) and the woman (Elizabeth; Gen3:15) that made the exposition of the holy of holies possible among men in Nazareth of Galilee . . . which was Mary as a natural consequence that the Priestly service of Zechariah was over. I think that this is the fruition of the Nazarite vow.

It spells salvation by faith after carnal desire has been stupefied. It ends the involutional period of life that makes room for the Immaculate Conception of Mary wherein Christ was conceived after the sixth month of Elizabeth's seclusion. The annunciation by Gabriel of God to Zechariah of the Abijah first announces the evolutionary period of life and here begins with the Annunciation of Mary in Nazareth of Galilee (which is purgatory with Bethlehem being the gate of purgatory = the narrow gate).

The transition from Elizabeth to Mary is needed to purify Judea into [Catholic] gold.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-15-2005, 09:57 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crucifiction
One of the arguments I hear against Jesus being the Messiah is that the Messiah is supposed to be a Nazerite
Nazerite? I thought the correct form was Tangerine or something.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 01-16-2005, 06:32 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Luke 1:26-27?

It may be argued that Zechariah and Elizabeth 'were' the town of Nazareth and Mary was the womb of the Lord after he had replaced the reproach of Elizabeth among men = peace and quiet in the valley.

The reproach of Elizabeth ended the enmity between the serpent (eve) and the woman (Elizabeth; Gen3:15) that made the exposition of the holy of holies possible among men in Nazareth of Galilee . . . which was Mary as a natural consequence that the Priestly service of Zechariah was over. I think that this is the fruition of the Nazarite vow.

It spells salvation by faith after carnal desire has been stupefied. It ends the involutional period of life that makes room for the Immaculate Conception of Mary wherein Christ was conceived after the sixth month of Elizabeth's seclusion. The annunciation by Gabriel of God to Zechariah of the Abijah first announces the evolutionary period of life and here begins with the Annunciation of Mary in Nazareth of Galilee (which is purgatory with Bethlehem being the gate of purgatory = the narrow gate).

The transition from Elizabeth to Mary is needed to purify Judea into [Catholic] gold.
For the record, the Visitation of Mary to Elizabeth permeates the house of David as the father of Christ who in return prepared the way for Jesus to be born and give order in the New World. This is the time that the evolutionary period effectively begins in the physical world. Notice here that Mary is the fullness of the HS later called the third person of the Trinity in the New World.

It is futile to argue that Christ stole the trone of David his father for who are we to argue with the Lord (unless the argument is to continue without end). In other words, to deny Christ is to deny heaven on earth and that is equal to crucifying Christ instead of Jesus = reality behind holocaust.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-16-2005, 11:07 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
Default

Chili... I really, really hate to say it; but what the hell are you talking about? No offense intended, but I sometimes simply can't follow your posts.
Crucifiction is offline  
Old 01-16-2005, 03:56 PM   #5
Moderator - Miscellaneous Discussions
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shenzhen, S.E. China (UK ex-pat)
Posts: 14,249
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro Nut
Nazerite? I thought the correct form was Tangerine or something.

Boro Nut
Tangerine Dream was a synth group or something, Boro.
MrFrosty is offline  
Old 01-17-2005, 09:03 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crucifiction
Chili... I really, really hate to say it; but what the hell are you talking about? No offense intended, but I sometimes simply can't follow your posts.
That's OK, these posts were not easy to follow but true nonetheless. They intent to show the metaphysics that allow Catholicism to be the new religion in the New World that contains heaven as an ultimate destiny on earth. It is wrong, and would be wrong, to send a messiah if heaven doesn't come along with him so that the future will be transformed into the present. The departure of Jesus meant that heaven was here to stay with Mary becoming the embodiment of the paraclete to give enduring presence to God and Christ in the trinity.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.