FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2011, 01:23 AM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoodguy View Post
Good points. I'd say that there are advocates other than Christians for the various positions and the lack of evidence leads to the substitution of rhetorical lingo for evidence.
the lack of evidence leads to the proper skeptical position that no decision may be determined.
youngalexander is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 11:49 PM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So a poster claims that McGrath has not represented Doherty's position correctly, and McGrath's response is "this is the sot of thing creationists say when their work gets criticized by scientists."

WTF?

McGrath comes off very poorly there.
To give him his credit, McGrath does not sound like a creationist at all.

When was the last time you heard a creationist say that he gets the truth from 'fabricated material' , 'however inauthentic it may be as far as the details are concerned'?

Be honest. Creationists never say they are happy to use 'fabricated material'

Ergo, McGrath is not a creationist.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 02:54 AM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So a poster claims that McGrath has not represented Doherty's position correctly, and McGrath's response is "this is the sot of thing creationists say when their work gets criticized by scientists."

WTF?

McGrath comes off very poorly there.
To give him his credit, McGrath does not sound like a creationist at all.

When was the last time you heard a creationist say that he gets the truth from 'fabricated material' , 'however inauthentic it may be as far as the details are concerned'?

Be honest. Creationists never say they are happy to use 'fabricated material'

Ergo, McGrath is not a creationist.
True Steven. That sounds like a propogandist, more than a creationist.
dog-on is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 06:36 AM   #54
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So a poster claims that McGrath has not represented Doherty's position correctly, and McGrath's response is "this is the sot of thing creationists say when their work gets criticized by scientists."

WTF?

McGrath comes off very poorly there.
To give him his credit, McGrath does not sound like a creationist at all.

When was the last time you heard a creationist say that he gets the truth from 'fabricated material' , 'however inauthentic it may be as far as the details are concerned'?

Be honest. Creationists never say they are happy to use 'fabricated material'

Ergo, McGrath is not a creationist.
True Steven. That sounds like a propogandist, more than a creationist.
An advocate with a blog and an opinion.

McGrath has not blogged on this subject for some time. Maybe he got bored.
jgoodguy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.