Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-21-2013, 03:50 PM | #31 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Because in comparison with other Hebrew names (which I indicated in my first posting) which are not so different than the Hebrew original, the name IESOUS is strange. If the Greek could make other names similar to the Hebrew couldn't it also just as easily have IEOSOUA for Yehoshua in the Torah/Joshua and IESOUA for Yeshua in Nehemiah and Ezra?
Quote:
|
||
01-21-2013, 05:31 PM | #32 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Why haven't you responded to this, Duvduv?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
01-21-2013, 06:00 PM | #33 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Why would it be to remove the divine name when the name Yehoshua is all over the Tanach? It's probably just a matter of pronunciation. For example the name YEHUDA can sound like YUDA when someone speaks Hebrew quickly.
Quote:
|
|||
01-21-2013, 07:24 PM | #34 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
We are not dealing with modern Hebrew, but the evidence from the literature we have from antiquity. There are many names that show the change from Yeho- to Yo- or Ye- in the Tanakh. Why do we have Yehoahaz and Yoahaz (both Ιωαχαζ), Yehozedeq and Yozedeq (interestingly Ιωσαδακ and Ιωσεδεκ, indicating two different readers both with the abbreviation), Yehoyada and Yoyada, Yehohanan and Yohanan (both Ιωαναν), often for the same person?
|
01-21-2013, 08:12 PM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
In fact, to worship Jesus and preach his name was the only thing needed to be called heretic and then you were given a choice and most ppl chose to die as martyr for the ideal they saw in that so called sacred name. After that they got to pick their own recipe to match their name to fame. It so was that their Book of Martyrs became their small c canon. In reality to say the word Jesus is the supposed to be the 'final lie we choke on' as the 'word' we could not utter, and so reach the end of our own world including our religion, in the same way that God is never used by Jews except as G-d. I .e. Jesus Christ is not the same as Jesus. |
|
01-21-2013, 09:48 PM | #36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
The curse of a federal holiday for a state employee
Now I've done it. I expanded that table of Jesus and Jehosadek to make it clear that, for whatever reason they might have had, the Greek speaking Jews who translated 1 Chronicles, Haggai, Zechariah consistently translated Yeshua
*(Lust, J) "Messianism and the Greek Version of Jeremiah: Jer 23, 5-6 and 33, 14-26" (SBL SCS 31, 1991, 87-122) The major distinctive characteristic of the Greek version is not its use of the term άνατολή in v. 5, but rather its rendition of the future king’s name at the end of v. 6. The lxx reads Ιωσεδεκ. This means that the translator probably found יוצדק [Jozadak = "IO is righteous"] in his Hebrew Vorlage where the MT has צדקנו יְהוָ֥ה [YHWH is our righteousness] The Greek name in particular resembles that of Zedekiah. The theophoric element stands in front Io-sedek (Ιω-σεδεκ), whereas in the usual spelling of the king’s name, Zedeki-Yah (צדק־יה), it figures at the end. According to E. Lipinski, these are two different forms of the same name, belonging to one and the same person. If this is correct, it means that the original oracle, such as preserved in the lxx, welcomed Zedekiah, alias Io-sedek, as the successor to the throne of David after the exile of Jehoiakin. (p. 43)DCH (Damn, used the title Line again!) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01-21-2013, 10:01 PM | #37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
1:00am already? Thank God it is a blizzard outside so work might be canceled tomorrow
Here is a table of LXX translations of Hebrew passages concentrating on Joshua son of Nun and Joshua son of Jehozadak. Sorry for the crappy transliteration of the Hebrew. BW should have used Times New Roman unicode characters rather than a proprietary font (where it is much more comprehensible).
Sleep calls me ... DCH |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01-21-2013, 11:37 PM | #38 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
I've had Catholic acquaintances and co-workers all of my life. About half of my extended family in the U.S. is Catholic. My next door neighbor of the last 6 years, Father John is the Priest of our local Catholic Parish, occasionally we walk in the Lions Club Park together and discuss politics and social justice. I just spent this last Christmas Eve with my son's girlfriends family in the presence of approximately 30 practicing Catholics, many of them just having returned from Mass. In fact I and my wife spent the entire week of this Christmas holiday as guest in the household of her huge Catholic family. (as we have for several years now) My son's former High School Catholic girlfriend used to bring me Catholic literature that used the Name Yahweh, and her father, our local Probate Judge used to have us over for afternoons in his pool, and family cookouts. And our daughters performed in recitals together. On the Judges recommendation I enrolled my son in a large Mid-Western Jesuit University, where he has received his Degree, is an alumni, and now sits on its Advisory Board and also holds several other committee seats. In short Chili my friend, I have spent many many hours in conversations with many other Catholics and I do not find them to be even half as weird as what you present them to be in your posts on this Forum. None of them has ever went off into the psychedelic off the wall speeches that you present us with here daily in this Forum. While I do not have any love or respect for teachings of, nor the Institution known as Catholicism, none the less I have many near and dear friends and family members whom are Catholics. (My eldest surviving Aunt has been a practicing Catholic for 93 years now) I love them anyway, although I'm convinced that they have been duped. But then most of them were born into it, and it is very hard for them to ever turn their back on their upbringing and traditions. I may not agree with their views but they have my sympathy. |
||
01-21-2013, 11:51 PM | #39 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
But I have also told you that American Catholics are no longer Catholic, or at least pretend not to be, as if they have painted red paint on their front door to say: I am already Christian, try the neighbor maybe, (who might buy the shit you have to sell). In short, Catholicism is a mystery religion, much like Judaism where Tradition is they way to go to heaven since that is where Mary is from, who is a local, and will appear to even Chinese as Chinese, and around the world will She be the perfect image of mortal beauty, always a local, to be sure, and without sin, I must add, as the mediatrix to heaven and the girl who pulls all the strings for us to get there even. Of course you have probably warped all your Catholic friends so much that they would not know about this even. . . . or maybe they just do not say. |
|||
01-22-2013, 12:17 AM | #40 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Quote:
As far as I can tell I've had little if any influence at all upon their views, all they know of me is that I am very polite, and have never been heard to argue either religion or politics with anyone. I am tsaphan. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|