FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2013, 09:09 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Luke on the other hand seems to have been written after Celsus's criticism of the original account of the baptism of Jesus in the Gospel of the Hebrews. For Celsus wrote:

Quote:
"When you were bathing," says the Jew, "beside John, you say that what had the appearance of a bird from the air alighted upon you." And then this same Jew of his, continuing his interrogations, asks, "What credible witness beheld this appearance? or who heard a voice from heaven declaring you to be the Son of God? What proof is there of it, save your own assertion, and the statement of another of those individuals who have been punished along with you?" [Against Celsus 1.41]
Now Luke presents the story as happening with multitudes of people witnessing the descent of the dove which is the Holy Spirit alongside Jesus:

Quote:
When all the people were being baptized, Jesus was baptized too. And as he was praying, heaven was opened and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.”
This is a frequent feature of Luke. He is interested in demonstrating that there were multiple witnesses to things. It is almost as if he knows of two or three gospels and is seeking to straighten out the various discrepancies.

Notice also the addition of 'in bodily form' (perhaps to counter the Marcionites who denied that Jesus ever had a physical form) and notice the missing euthys which appears in all accounts hitherto.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-23-2013, 10:01 PM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Justin Martyr Dialogue 88:

Quote:
And then, when Jesus had gone to the river Jordan, where John was baptizing, and when He had stepped into the water, a fire was kindled in the Jordan; and when He came out of the water, the Holy Ghost lighted on Him like a dove, the apostles of this very Christ of ours wrote. Now, we know that he did not go to the river because He stood in need of baptism, or of the descent of the Spirit like a dove; even as He submitted to be born and to be crucified, not because He needed such things, but because of the human race, which from Adam had fallen under the power of death and the guile of the serpent, and each one of which had committed personal transgression.
Quote:
but then the Holy Ghost, and for man's sake, as I formerly stated, lighted on Him in the form of a dove, and there came at the same instant from the heavens a voice, which was uttered also by David when he spoke, personating Christ, what the Father would say to Him: 'Thou art My Son: this day have I begotten Thee;' [the Father] saying that His generation would take place for men, at the time when they would become acquainted with Him: 'Thou art My Son; this day have I begotten thee.' "
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 12:17 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I wonder whether the 'as a dove' reference was ever there. The earliest gospel reference to the narrative must have been Jerome's Hebrew gospel:

Quote:
And it came to pass when the Lord was come up out of the water, the whole fount of the Holy Spirit descended upon him and rested on him and said to him: My son, in all the prophets was I waiting for you that you should come and I might rest in you. For you are my rest; you are my firstbegotten Son that reigns forever
As Ferguson notes "this Gospel contains semitic features like the Holy Spirit as female and as speaking in the manner of the divine wisdom in the Wisdom literature.Its reference to the baptism of Jesus focuses upon the coming of the Spirit." (p. 105) Origen says he saw the text of this gospel in Caesarea. This is probably where Jerome accessed the text. There is no specific reference to 'Jesus' being the man baptized. The ambiguity may have left open the possibility that the one being baptized became Jesus. Also the figure is clearly a prophet (= 'in all the prophets ...).

The next gospel is Epiphanius's Hebrew text which - translated already into Greek - reads:

Quote:
The people having been baptized, Jesus came also, and was baptized by John. And as he came out of the water the heavens opened, and he saw the Holy Spirit descending under the form of a dove, and entering into him. And a voice was heard from heaven: "Thou art my beloved Son, and in thee am I well pleased. And again: "This day have I begotten thee."
Here the name 'Jesus' is for the first time specifically attached to the individual being baptized. The reference to the 'dove' now appears too. Epiphanius's text appears to be a loose retelling of Jerome's more original text.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 05:43 AM   #74
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Here the name 'Jesus' is for the first time specifically attached to the individual being baptized. The reference to the 'dove' now appears too. Epiphanius's text appears to be a loose retelling of Jerome's more original text.
They were all the same and still are. Just watch the holy rollers on TV to see: that if you zap them one by each, one of them will likely start to yodel and that song is catchy and soon they will all are singing. Just a stage master who knows it is catchy like a disease that he calls 'the good news' that Jesus is coming, but will always be 'still coming' without end.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 08:24 AM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
I think I figured it out. ... When Celsus says that Jesus saw the holy Spirit come down on him he is clearly quoting from this material:

Quote:
And as he came out of the water the heavens opened, and he saw the Holy Spirit descending under the form of a dove, and entering into him.
But the words 'as a dove' or 'under the form of the dove' must have been understood to be kyonah, the kaf prefix (= k) is the equivalent of 'as' or 'like' in Aramaic. But the original text must have been kiona (the same letters save for an alef instead of a he) which means 'straight' or 'directly' so the original text read:

Quote:
And as he came out of the water the heavens opened, and he saw the Holy Spirit descending straight down and entering into him.
What do you think?
My painstaking and pre-cise investigation has uncovered the fact that "Doves" are a variety of Pigeons. What, pray tell, are pigeons famous for? Just park under a bridge to find out.

Therefore, the passage really is saying:
"the heavens opened and he [John] saw the Holy Spirit descending like pigeon poop, and entering into him [obviously John, as he stood, face looking up, and his mouth open in awe at this sight]." (Mar 1:10)
Consequently, God makes John a prophet, meaning,
"and a voice came from heaven [through John], "Thou art my beloved Son; with thee I am well pleased."" (vs 11)
However, I am of the opinion that he would more likely have said "Huck Pa-tooi!"

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 10:10 AM   #76
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
don't forget that this would be the second mistaken translation from this section. Jerome points out John did not eat "locusts" but "cakes dipped in oil"
Locusts and wild honey sounds like a more balanced long-term diet than cakes and honey. Having said that, were I in John's sandals I would probably have eaten more honey than locusts.
Tommy is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 02:38 PM   #77
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
My painstaking and pre-cise investigation has uncovered the fact that "Doves" are a variety of Pigeons. What, pray tell, are pigeons famous for? Just park under a bridge to find out.
Be carefull here in that pidgeon flying is an ancient sport. It is popular where I came from, and at that time was about the only reason not to go to Church on Sunday if they were coming in (and maybe that is why it was so popular).

They were banded and would have to catch them inside the coop to remove the band and bring it in to claim their prize.

http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Pigeon-Flying.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 09:38 PM   #78
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

If I recall correctly, there was a strain of Samaritan Messianism which conceptualized the Messiah as a new Noah (similar to how other strains viewed the Messiah as a new David, Joshua, Aaron, etc), and that there was about to be a third "cleansing" of the Earth. The first, supposedly was the flood, the second was the wind that knocked down the Tower of Babel and the third was going to be fire.

This would tie in with John the Baptist being portrayed as saying the Holy Spirit would immerse them in fire (the next element after water and wind).

The dove imagery could conceivably tie into that. with Jesus as some sort of allegorical high ground or refuge from the coming "flood" of fire.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 09:59 PM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I don't know about this strand of Samaritanism
stephan huller is offline  
Old 02-24-2013, 10:19 PM   #80
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
I don't know about this strand of Samaritanism
I'll dig around and see what I can find. I'm trying to remember where I read about it. I think it may have been in G.R.S. Mead's John the Baptist book, but it may have been one of Geza Vermes' books. I'll have to do some rooting around. It is pretty obscure, but I've always thought the Samaritans were an overlooked and unappreciated subject of research.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.