FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-2004, 04:39 PM   #31
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Default

In the absence of any M&PC mods I'll mention that this is looking to me a lot like a BC&H discussion instead of an M&PC thread and you may see one of the mods punting it over to that forum or possibly splitting it.

cheers,
Michael
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:53 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Other Michael
In the absence of any M&PC mods I'll mention that this is looking to me a lot like a BC&H discussion instead of an M&PC thread and you may see one of the mods punting it over to that forum or possibly splitting it.

cheers,
Michael
That'd be fine with me. But there's too many logical fallacies (ad homs, poisoning the well, arguments from authority in particular) in BGiC's last post for me to be very interested in responding to it. I think I'm done here for now. Perhaps if the topic generates more comments in another forum I'll jump back in.
Mageth is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:10 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,881
Post Fair enough

The Other Michael,
Quote:
In the absence of any M&PC mods I'll mention that this is looking to me a lot like a BC&H discussion instead of an M&PC thread and you may see one of the mods punting it over to that forum or possibly splitting it.
Sure. Naturally, Mageth would continue with the affirmition of his proposition that the Gospels are rightly categorized as 'myth', as a matter of fact, and, since it is his assertion, he has burden of proof. I'm game to that.

Regards,
BGic
Cross Examiner is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:42 PM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default

*Terribly off-topic*

Rule #1 in Christian debating. The other guy always has the burden of proof!
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:43 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,881
Post uh no

Jimmy Higgins
Quote:
Rule #1 in Christian debating. The other guy always has the burden of proof!
Nope. He who asserts backs it up.

Regards,
BGic
Cross Examiner is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:45 PM   #36
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default Re: uh no

Quote:
Originally posted by Billy Graham is cool
Jimmy Higgins

Nope. He who asserts backs it up.

Regards,
BGic
Care to prove that?
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:53 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,881
Post Back it up or pack it up

Jimmy Higgins,
Quote:
Care to prove that?
Prove? That's quaint. In a legal action, the plaintiff alleges something (e.g. Mageth's assertions) against the defendant and inherits the burden of proof. If the roles were reversed and I said that no one has walked on the moon, then, guess what? I get the burden of proof. Likewise, Mageth kicked things off by asserting that the Gospels are rightly classified as 'myth', as a matter of fact, and, since this is his assertion, this is his burden. Back it up or pack it up

Regards,
BGic
Cross Examiner is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 06:06 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
Default

Wrong. The burden is on he who makes the claim that something is true. The presumptive position is that something is not true unless shown to be so… unless you’d like to demonstrate to us that the truth claims of the Koran and its 1.5 billion Muslim adherents are wrong.
Howard is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 06:13 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,881
Wink I thought I was pedantic ...

Howard,
Quote:
Wrong. The burden is on he who makes the claim that something is true. The presumptive position is that something is not true unless shown to be so… unless you’d like to demonstrate to us that the truth claims of the Koran and its 1.5 billion Muslim adherents are wrong.
Yes, this is a more technically accurate sense of burden of proof. I was running off memory, mea culpa. Nonetheless, since Mageth affirms his proposition that it is true that the Gospels are rightly categorized as 'myth', he still gets burden. No two ways 'round it gents.

Regards,
BGic
Cross Examiner is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 06:17 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,431
Default Re: Fair enough

Quote:
Originally posted by Billy Graham is cool

Sure. Naturally, Mageth would continue with the affirmition of his proposition that the Gospels are rightly categorized as 'myth', as a matter of fact, and, since it is his assertion, he has burden of proof. I'm game to that.
[/B]
myth ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mth)
n.

1.
1. A traditional, typically ancient story dealing with supernatural beings, ancestors, or heroes that serves as a fundamental type in the worldview of a people, as by explaining aspects of the natural world or delineating the psychology, customs, or ideals of society: the myth of Eros and Psyche; a creation myth.

It is more than fair to call them "myths".
Mrhat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.