FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2006, 05:31 PM   #201
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Has any of the thread participants observed a recitation of the plagues during a seder? Theoretically one is supposed to drip wine from one's glass for each plague in memory of the suffering of the Egyptians - thus the glass is less than full, because happiness that comes on the account of another's suffering cannot be complete. However, in all seders I had participated in, this recitation wasn't a solemn time but a time of hilarity, with everyone reciting in unison. I think the authors of Exodus just added whatever disasters they could come up with in increasing severity for literary and dramatic purposes. The Exodus cycle is exciting story-telling material.
Anat is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 06:14 PM   #202
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 1,126
Default response to post #190

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Well, you wouldn't know what quite a lot is when you haven't read their work.
that's not a definition.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
You seem to be losing track. We are talking about different things over different posts. The Italians were the most recent archaeologists at Jericho and don't comment on Ai.
you are right. i am sorry. i meant the battle of jericho. sorry about the confusion.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Try to disparage what you don't know or understand. Your tendentious motivation betrays your lack of response with this attempt to belittle what you are ignorant of..
i have done no such thing. i have merely tried to illustrate that it is highly unlikely that their's will be the final say regarding the issue.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
The Italians are not working in a vacuum, but in the context of Kenyon's work at Jericho. To understand their work, it would help if you knew something tangible about Kenyon. Their work reflects development on Kenyon, so they explore areas other than those she investigated in order to test the implications of the earlier work. There digs at Jericho covered a wide range of phases, so their look at the Late Bronze city was only a part of their overall efforts. in unearthing where the walls should have been in places basically on top of old ones, shows that there were no walls. Stratigraphy is simple but deadly effective.
when you say "no walls", do you mean none from the alleged time of the battle?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
What elsewould you like?
two different people can look at the same artifact and draw different conclusions. that includes people from different times. my point is that it is presumptuous, at this time, to state that the remains contradict the biblical account no matter how exemplary Nigro and Marchetti's work may have been.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Why talk about Ai in a post not about Ai?? You need to keep better track when you answer as you do.
a carryover from the previous mistake. sorry. please insert jericho in place of ai.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
At this rate, none of the old archaeology you tout has any value, because it is far from over.
ugh. i haven't "touted" anything.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
If it reflects your a priori position then you use archaeology, when it doesn't, you go kamikaze. Get real. spin
another misrepresentation.
bfniii is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 06:28 PM   #203
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

Farrell Till beats the Exodus claims to death:

Logistical Improbabilities in the Wilderness-Wandering Tales (1)

http://www.theskepticalreview.com/jf...opulation.html

Lots of interesting articles on that sight...
xaxxat is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 07:11 PM   #204
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 1,126
Default response to post #191

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
If the Egyptians took the Israelite's animals to save their economy, where did the Israelites take all those sacrificial animals from - both for the first Passover and all those sacrifices in the desert?
sigh. maybe the ones they had gave birth to more?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
Even if the Israelites were fed by magical means, what about water? How many people (+flocks) can be sustained for any period by the kind of water sources found in Sinai?
addressed below



Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
Even if 600,000 does not mean 600,000, you have the numbers from the Numbers census, which aren't rounded, thus less 'open to interpretation'.
the numbers being rounded is not the issue. the interpretation of the words is the issue. i have seen at least 3 different suggestions as to how the numbers in exodus, numbers and joshua could be interpreted.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
However lush Sinai was, Canaan was more life-sustaining, and there the typical Israelite village had around 100 inhabitants. But if you are arguing from climate change, you have the wrong period. The late 13 century BCE was a time of failing crops all around the area - Greece, north Mesopotamia. In Har-Karkom Anati found many Chalcolitic to Middle Bronze Age sites, but hardly anything from Late Bronze and just one Iron Age site - looks like the area became *less* sustaining just when your hordes should have been passing through. (Right, that makes the miracle even greater!)
"wells and springs are to be found within a day's journey of each other all down the west coast from the suez area to el-markhah, and the water table is generally close to the surface of the gravelly ground. some sort of vegetation can be found in the wadis, and where there is permanent water, such as at an oasis, the vegetation flourishes accordingly. some of the mountains in the limestone range have small plateaus at their bases, and these provide modest grazing areas for herds and flocks."
r. k. harrison, old testament times, p. 132
bfniii is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 07:41 PM   #205
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 1,126
Default response to post #192

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
So, when other fudges fail, now we go back and rewrite the text.
rewrite? you mean try to understand what they could have meant several thousand years ago based on all available ancient documents?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
When the issues is what remains from camps from thousands of years ago, itr does help for you to keep to the subject. Yes, we are talking about the exodus, but you were trying to dodge the tangible lack of camp refuse of missing dumps, signs of camps,
not at all. i addressed that point specifically



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
by saying that it was a long time ago and these things don't leave traces, so the Roman camps show that your theory is unfounded.
again, we should compare apples to apples. the analogy you gave has several pertinent incongruencies with the exodus narrative. we know much, much more about the romans than we do about the exodus.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
A few million people cannot just wander, despite the allegations. The logistics involved in dealing with a transient group of a few million would not permit it.
which logistics would you be referring to?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
The text doesn't supply you with support when you don't get forty years of "wandering" but a long hanging in and out of Kadesh Barnea.
what about it?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Ten you wouldn't be trying to defend the literal correctness of the bible, would you? If it's not a few nillion people, then what if it's not an exodus either, etc.
it has to do with how they used the word. we say "a million" frequently when we don't mean it at all. but what if someone recorded a quote for posterity that contained that colloquialism? would people thousands of years in the future know to not interpret it literally?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Then they are well organized and not wandering.
i didn't mean exactly side by side in military formation. i meant in terms of width.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
The image was to try to show you just how big this group was when compared to the size of the Negeb, so that you would drop the mistaken idea about its vast size.
and there is no need for you to assume how many people were side by side which drastically affects the length of the train.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
You might make a better effort than your #92 post, which has no substance, yet you referred to it as indicative of something or other.
i have addressed your response to it so your accusation of it lacking substance is in doubt.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
There are scholarly analyses [Neumann and Parpola were the writers of one] of a region wide drought from Mesopotamia to Egypt which made the Negeb quite arid. This same drought is probably related to the movement of the Indo-European groups who pushed through the Balkans into Greece, Italy and down the Levantine coast -- this last movement pushed various populations before it and is referred to as the "sea peoples" which included the Philistines. So, no, the Negeb at this time was not more lush but at the beginning of a long drought. You need to go back a few hundred years to a better climate. spin
i addressed this in post #204.
bfniii is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 07:42 PM   #206
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

How much water would 3 million people consume in a day? How about their livestock?

http://www.theskepticalreview.com/jf...ess/water.html
xaxxat is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 07:44 PM   #207
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Have you seen those places, bfniii? The description you quoted lacks numbers, but you can't have more than a few dozens of people + accompanying livestock at such an oasis. The area where vegetation actually flourishes around an oasis is rather small.

On the numbers - what interpretation fits all the population numbers and results in a number that is reasonable considering the climate and other logistical problems, such as size of camp, access to the water, time it would take for the camp to move, etc? A link to a site that does not require registration is OK, but be specific, saying that there are interpretations isn't enough.
Anat is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 08:15 PM   #208
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfniii
when you say "no walls", do you mean none from the alleged time of the battle?
There were no Late Bronze Age walls. Kenyon attempted to say that the Middle Bronze Age walls may stll have been standing in places. However, the Jericho of the period was a small village which reused old tombs instead of cutting new ones.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 08:15 PM   #209
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 1,126
Default response to post #199

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
After making disparaging personal comments about various archaeologists, are you getting a little sensitive when it points out your lack of preparation for you awant to talk about?
i don't recall making any personal comments.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Stop projecting.
my comment came in response to personal remarks by you. if you don't like it, stop making personal remarks.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
A meaningful response from someone who has displayed no notion of what's involved.
i guess i should be intimidated. again, you aren't the authority on who knows what information.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
There are enough walls in Jericho to be studied. Ones from all sorts of levels, just none for the Late Bronze age.
key word: enough



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Nigro and Marchetti turned up lots of walls themselves. Your I-won't-open-my-eyes approach to the evidence, suits your methodology: briefly opens one eye to check to see if it's gone.
i'm not making the situation out to be something it's not, like you are. i have not ignored what they found at all, contrary to the way you are portraying me. why do you feel the need to shift the discussion to a personal level whenever someone isn't intimidated by you?



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Servants seasonally working the land, ie in the household of some wealthy citizen, are not part of the society. One finds nomadic peoples doing it for example. There were squabbles at Mari because of conflicts between nomads and locals.
you seem to be assuming that there were absolutely no habiru who stayed in permanent employment, that any who came in to work for a season necessarily left. i am not aware of the text saying that. therefore, it seems that your comment about them being outside of society is not completely accurate.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
You avoided answering my question: is your EB source the 1911 edition?
i'm not avoiding anything. my brittanica is 2002 and you have done nothing to prove it wrong.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
We were talking about the archaeologists from Italy who carried out excavations there. Try to stay on the subject.
i am on the subject and i'm referring to the palestinian authority that controls the site



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
This is an apologist's favour whine to savour when they don't like the evidence unearthed by archaeology.
you imply that i "dislike" the evidence. i don't dislike it at all. i just don't think it is as final as you think it is.



Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Your approach has been to refuse to accept the evidence whenever it doesn't suit your religious tendencies.
that hasn't been my approach at all.
bfniii is offline  
Old 05-26-2006, 08:18 PM   #210
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 1,126
Default response to post #200

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
This must have been a record breakng total eclipse of the sun, this is the first 72 hours eclipse. Bfniii, your book makes no sense.
it's not "my book" and it does make sense to some people.



Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
The Christian Bible is the most outrageous book I have ever come across. 72 hours of eclipse and still the israelites alone have light, what nonsense!
miracles are not supposed to be easy to believe. in order for you to not believe in miracles, all you have to do is prove there isn't a miracle worker. that should be easy.
bfniii is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.