FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2007, 07:41 AM   #191
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucretius View Post
Thought I would save Dave sometime in typing out his "positive proof" as he appeared to have limited time to do anything other than paste irrelevant old books before but it seems he has beaten me to it
Anyway here is my summary of the "Wiseman Hypothesis"

A Summary of the "Wiseman Tablet Hypothesis "


1) Writing has been found on clay tablets dating to around 3,000 B.C in the Middle East

TRUE
(How do we know they date to that time? ... Simple we use the verified dating techniques that YECs deride when they are used to date anything older than 4,004 B.C)


2) As the world according to the genealogies in Genesis only dates back to c.4,004 B.C then writing must have always existed.

An assertion completely unsupported by any real evidence

3)As the Book of Genesis purports to record events form Creation then as writing existed it must have been put down in writing at that time .

An assertion completely unsupported by any real evidence

4)Therefore Genesis must have been written on clay tablets

An assertion completely unsupported by any real evidence
5) As the only possible witness to Creation was God he must have written the account on clay tablets (OR dictated them to Adam who wrote on these tablets )

An assertion completely unsupported by any real evidence
6)Noah must have saved these tablets on the Ark during the Flood

2 assertions completely unsupported by any real evidence

7)Moses must have had these tablets and copied them down onto vellum

2 assertions completely unsupported by any real evidence
8)In spite of the fact that more mundane tablets and those containing other myths survived these "Holy Relics " must have been lost.

An assertion completely unsupported by any real evidence.

9)The different sections of Genesis were originally written in 11 parts by 11 different authors ,interrupted by "collophons" .

An assertion completely not only unsupported by any real evidence,but also contradicted by any actual scholarly reading of the texts we possess given that the 11 different authors each show an odd mixture of the 4 different writing styles and usages of words that are easily explained by the DH
Lucretius ... regarding "old books" ... in historical studies, OLDER (that is, closer to the time of the actual events) is BETTER. Do you understand why?

Do you realize that ALL evidence from ancient history is scanty? What does one have to do to convince you of the Tablet Theory? Produce the original tablets? Sorry, can't do that. Yet you demand so little from DH advocates that you would accept a theory with no evidence whatsoever (not even scatny evidence) of J E D and P documents?

What are you thinking? Please give me some reason to think you are more than just a closed minded, biased, recalcitrant skeptic.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:50 AM   #192
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Hey, I've just realized something...
Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave
We even have the complete text of one such book -- the Book of Enoch --which is referred to in the NT Book of Jude (14-15).
If Dave is sufficiently nuts to imagine that 1 Enoch is the actual words of Enoch, describing events that actually happened...

...Then Dave Hawkins is a Flat-Earther.

The Hebrew flat-Earth cosmology is VERY specific in 1 Enoch, far more so than in what is now the canonical OT. The flat Earth is covered by a solid Firmament, with a complex system of "gates" to let the Sun and Moon in and out of the dome. Enoch saw all this on a personal "guided tour" given by God himself.

Jude 1:14 at ErrancyWiki
You obviously have studied nothing about the history of the zodiac and ancient cosmological language. But I'm not going to enlighten you on this thread. Suffice to say that deciding a book is not canonical only means that it is not deemed to be an authoritative message from God, not that it contains errors, or that it is not actually a work of the stated author, etc. To pick another example, the works of Josephus are not canonical, but they are accurate as far as we know and are truly the work of Josephus.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:50 AM   #193
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave
Lucretius ... regarding "old books" ... in historical studies, OLDER (that is, closer to the time of the actual events) is BETTER. Do you understand why?
..."actual events"?

Which "actual events" are you referring to, Dave?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:51 AM   #194
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

Voxrat ...
Quote:
Most of us are pretty sure this "Adam" character is fictional.
But why? Just because that's what you've been told at Skeptic U? That's not good enough. Give me some good reasons which refute Faber's info.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:55 AM   #195
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Hey, I've just realized something...

If Dave is sufficiently nuts to imagine that 1 Enoch is the actual words of Enoch, describing events that actually happened...

...Then Dave Hawkins is a Flat-Earther.

The Hebrew flat-Earth cosmology is VERY specific in 1 Enoch, far more so than in what is now the canonical OT. The flat Earth is covered by a solid Firmament, with a complex system of "gates" to let the Sun and Moon in and out of the dome. Enoch saw all this on a personal "guided tour" given by God himself.

Jude 1:14 at ErrancyWiki
You obviously have studied nothing about the history of the zodiac and ancient cosmological language. But I'm not going to enlighten you on this thread. Suffice to say that deciding a book is not canonical only means that it is not deemed to be an authoritative message from God, not that it contains errors, or that it is not actually a work of the stated author, etc. To pick another example, the works of Josephus are not canonical, but they are accurate as far as we know and are truly the work of Josephus.
Dave, I am quite certain that I know more about the Sumerian/Babylonian/Caananite cosmological model than YOU do. But the rest of your post is a pretty impressive example of a non-sequitur. I'm not the one who cares about "canonicity". If you want to delare Enoch to be error-free (thereby implicitly endorsing the Hebrew flat-Earth cosmology, whether you realize it or not)... that's not MY problem.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:57 AM   #196
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Voxrat ...
Quote:
Most of us are pretty sure this "Adam" character is fictional.
But why? Just because that's what you've been told at Skeptic U? That's not good enough. Give me some good reasons which refute Faber's info.
"Adam" is a symbolic fictional character with symbolic name in a fictional/symbolic story cribbed from earlier myths. The whole story is just myth, as is shown by many, many lines of evidence -- all of which you ignore.
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:57 AM   #197
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
LET'S REITERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF PRESUPPOSITIONS ON DH DEVELOPMENT
Merely re-iterating your claimed "presuppositions" does not make them any more true and does not make them any more relevant either.

If you wish to show that these "presuppositions" are necessary parts of the DH, then you need to show that the DH does not work without them.


Quote:
Leaving aside your rant full of hyperbole and loaded words such as "mutilate", let's look at your picture.

The first thing to note is that this is not a representative sample. In the vast majority of places in the Torah (in fact in pretty much every place other than here), the split between sources is - barring the occasional one-line insertion by an editor - on the level of a paragraph or chapter. Dave has chosen place with the most complex mix of sources and chosen to present it as a representative sample.

Having said that, the diagram that Dave has reproduced here is interesting evidence for the DH.

After all, if you take any random piece of text and chop half of it out you will be left with gibberish.

Here, though, chopping half the text out leaves - interestingly enough - a coherent narrative written in a distinctive style.

Now for the really good bit.

If we look at what has been chopped out of this, then we get another coherent narrative written in a distinctive (but different) style as this one.

Moreover, by splitting the text in this manner, all the contradictions and discrepancies in the text have disappeared. The two accounts are different - but neither individual text has any duplications or contradictions like the combined text has.

To show this in more detail, here is the full text of the flood story:

Quote:
6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
6:3 And Yahweh said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6:6 And it repented Yahweh that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
6:7 And Yahweh said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of Yahweh.
6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
6:10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
6:11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
6:12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
6:14 Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
6:15 And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.
6:16 A window shalt thou make to the ark, and in a cubit shalt thou finish it above; and the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it.
6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
6:18 But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.
6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
6:20 Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive.
6:21 And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather it to thee; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them.
6:22 Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he.
7:1 And Yahweh said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
7:2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
7:3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
7:4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.
7:5 And Noah did according unto all that Yahweh commanded him.
7:6 And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
7:7 And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.
7:8 Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
7:9 There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.
7:10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
7:13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;
7:14 They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort.
7:15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
7:16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and Yahweh shut him in.
7:17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
8:1 And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged;
8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;
8:3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
8:5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
8:6 And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made:
8:7 And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.
8:8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
8:9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
8:10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;
8:11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
8:12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.
8:13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
8:14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
8:15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
8:16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.
8:17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
8:18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:
8:19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
8:20 And Noah builded an altar unto Yahweh; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
8:21 And Yahweh smelled a sweet savour; and Yahweh said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
8:22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
Here is the J text in isolation:

Quote:
6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
6:3 And Yahweh said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6:6 And it repented Yahweh that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
6:7 And Yahweh said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of Yahweh.
7:1 And Yahweh said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
7:2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
7:3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
7:4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.
7:5 And Noah did according unto all that Yahweh commanded him.
7:7 And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.
7:10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
7:16 and Yahweh shut him in.
7:17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
8:2 and the rain from heaven was restrained;
8:3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually:
8:6 And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made:
8:8 Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground;
8:9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
8:10 And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark;
8:11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
8:12 And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.
8:13 and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
8:20 And Noah builded an altar unto Yahweh; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.
8:21 And Yahweh smelled a sweet savour; and Yahweh said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
8:22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
Here is the P text in isolation:

Quote:
6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
6:10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
6:11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
6:12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
6:14 Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
6:15 And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.
6:16 A window shalt thou make to the ark, and in a cubit shalt thou finish it above; and the door of the ark shalt thou set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it.
6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
6:18 But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.
6:19 And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
6:20 Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive.
6:21 And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten, and thou shalt gather it to thee; and it shall be for food for thee, and for them.
6:22 Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he.
7:8 Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
7:9 There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.
7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
7:13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;
7:14 They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort.
7:15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
7:16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him:
7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
8:1 And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged;
8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped,
8:3 and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
8:5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
8:7 And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.
8:13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth:
8:14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
8:15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
8:16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.
8:17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
8:18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him:
8:19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.
That each of these stories stands alone with fluent narrative and with a distinct style that survives the translation into English should be obvious to everyone.

This is what Dave characterises as "mutilating" the text.

Quote:
LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT DEAN'S EVIDENCE FOR THE DH
Here's a graphic of how the Pentateuch supposedly came into existence. Time flows from top to bottom. As you can see, oral tradition is a major part of the theory although Dean tries to deny it. There is even an entire school of criticism known as the "Oral Traditionists" (Uppsala School). But all three schools -- Wellhausen with the DH, Gunkel and his Form Critics, and the Scandinvian Uppsla School all placed a great emphasis on Oral Tradition.
I have never tried to deny that some scholars place emphasis on oral tradition. What I have said is that (as can be seen on your diagram), the DH proposes the editing together of written sources (the sources on the diagram are written long before they are edited together). Whether these written sources were originally oral traditions (as the creator of this diagram thinks) is not relevant to the DH.

Dave gives the appearance of to wanting to protray the DH as requiring oral sources because he wants to portray it as being incompatible with the early invention of writing. This is simply false. The DH is compatible with its written sources originally being oral traditions (and this is the view of whoever created that diagram), but it does not require that there was no writing at earlier times which is what Dave's "presupposition" asserts.


Quote:
USE OF DIVINE NAMES
Dave here claims that the usage of different names within the same text is normal in Jewish texts, and does not need a DH to explain it.

He (and his source) miss the point though, appearing to be clinging to the strawman of "Each source in the DH uses a different name for God". This is simply not true.

Each of the DH sources itself uses different names in different places. But when split using the criteria of style or theme or age of writing, each source is internally consistent in how it uses the different names.

Quote:
NATURE AND ROLE OF PRIESTS
Dean writes in summary ... Stop and think for a minute. If you want to have a theory that there is such a thing as a "P" source document and you take the liberty of chopping up text as Genesis is chopped up above, then OF COURSE you can support your theory. It's quite easy. Just select all the verses which talk about the Aaronic priests having access to God and Voila! ... you have it! "What a beautiful theory!" Rubbish! No one would think of attempting this with any other historical text ... why with the Pentateuch? Keep in mind also that there is not even the slightest hint of the existence of such a "P" document (or any of the others) in any ancient texts anywhere in the world. But there are hints of the existence of written records kept by Adam and his descendants. In fact, they signed the documents they wrote with "these are the generations of ... " and we have independent confirmation from ancient Babylonian and Assyrian tablets that this "toledoth" was in common use.

My rebuttal above also applies to Dean's points C - G as well. If Dean wishes to overcome this challenge, it would helpful to provide an online chart which shows all the supposed divisions of the text into the alleged J E D and P sources, as I have supplied for the first chapters of Genesis.
Dave has here done exactly what I predicted. He has claimed that each individual measure can be the result of arbitrary splitting.

What he has not done is explain why there is consilience between the ways of splitting - why splitting in each way produces the same results. If we chose to split a text into parts arbitrarily to match one way of differentiating the text, we would expect the comparison of those parts according to other ways of differentiating the text to show random and mixed results - just like we see when we split the text by Toledoths.

Instead, when the text is split as the DH splits it, we see conlisience and correlation between the different ways of differentiating it.

Dave's criticism here works when applied to his own theory, but fails utterly when applied to the DH, because the DH shows consilience that his own Tablet theory does not.

Dave has yet to make any attempt to explain this consilience.


Quote:
DOUBLETS AND TRIPLETS
Dean writes ... To answer the first objection, I simply point out that repetition of some accounts is exactly what we would expect from a compilation. On this point, the DH and the Tablet Theory agree.
But the way the DH splits the text, the repetition is a result of separate sources being compiled. The way Tablet theory splits the text, individual sources each have repetitions.

So the DH and Tablet Theory do not agree here.

What Dave points out here is indeed exactly what we would expect if the DH were true, but goes against what we would expect if Tablet theory were true.


Quote:
LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE
Dean writes ... I'm not sure if I disagree with this or not. Given my view that the Pentateuch is a compilation, I would expect the various tablet sources to vary in their language. If Dean could give a detailed, specific example, I could analyze it.
If there was variation in language between Tablets, then we would see consistent language within each Toledoth-to-Toledoth section (a single Tablet), but variation between the different Toledoth-to-Toledoth sections. As can be seen by the example of the Flood story, what we actually see is variation within each Toledoth-to-Toledoth section. As I pointed out some examples of in my original post, what we actually see is consistent language within each DH source and variation between each DH source.

In other words, given Dave's own views on what he would expect to see if the Torah is a compilation, we see what Dave would expect to see if the DH were true, and fail to see what Dave would expect to see if the Tablet theory were true.


Summary

Dave starts of with hyperbole, and tries to call separation into stylistically independent narratives "cockamamie" and a "mutilation" of the text, using as an example a piece of text that turns from a single repetitive and contradictory jumble into two coherent narratives when "multilated".

He then points out that some scholars think that the written DH sources were originally oral traditions - which is irrelevant.

He then points out that we should expect to see multiple divine names used (with consistent usage rules) in an individual text - which is exactly what we see in each of the DH sources.

He then claims that each individual way of splitting the text could be arbitrary - but fails to explain why the DH splitting of the text is consilient but the Tablet theory splitting is not.

He then makes two claims about what we would expect from a compiled text - both being claims that the DH matches but the Tablet theory fails to match.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:58 AM   #198
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Gotta go!

I'll hopefully be back later to respond to Dave's latest post...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:00 AM   #199
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Lucretius ... regarding "old books" ... in historical studies, OLDER (that is, closer to the time of the actual events) is BETTER. Do you understand why?
Not necessarily. Do you understand why? Do you understand that the credibility of, say, The Epic of Gilgamesh, or The Iliad, is not correlated with their venerable antiquity?
Quote:
Do you realize that ALL evidence from ancient history is scanty? What does one have to do to convince you of the Tablet Theory? Produce the original tablets? Sorry, can't do that. Yet you demand so little from DH advocates that you would accept a theory with no evidence whatsoever (not even scatny evidence) of J E D and P documents?
You continue to ask this question, and yet you continue to ignore the evidence that Dean presented yesterday. That evidence - and, no, it doesn't involve producing the actual documents - is much more abundant and compelling than anything you've presented.
Quote:
What are you thinking? Please give me some reason to think you are more than just a closed minded, biased, recalcitrant skeptic.
Well, now, considering the fact that you cannot, or will not, address Dean's points, I think this question is much more appropriately put to you, Dave.
VoxRat is offline  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:03 AM   #200
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
LET'S REITERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF PRESUPPOSITIONS ON DH DEVELOPMENT

DOCUMENTARY PRESUPPOSITIONS
1) Priority of source analysis over archaeology
2) Natural view of Israel's religion and history
3) No writing in Israel at Moses' time
4) Legendary view of the patriarchal narratives
5) Presupposition of anti-supernaturalism

I will keep hammering these points home so as to keep them in the forefront of your minds because, contrary to Dean's assertions to the contrary, these are extremely important points.
Important points about what, Dave? Because they have absolutely nothing to do with the DH. The DH is perfectly compatible with all of them being true, and with all of them being false, because they have nothing to do with the thesis of the DH.

Quote:
These presuppositions are THE reasons that DH advocates would bend over backwards to twist, distort, kill, maim, destroy a historical text with a theory that truly resembles the Epicycle Theory of the Solar System. No one would think of attacking any other historical document in the way that the Pentateuch has been attacked unless there is some strong philosophical motivation for doing so.
What is this "attack" that you're talking about, Dave? You yourself believe that the Pentaeuch is a compilation of various written accounts by various authors! How is your hypothesis about the Pentateuch even different from the DH?

Quote:
The 5 presuppositions identified above combined with a bias against the traditions of organized religion prevalent in 19th century Europe provide such a motivation.
Who fucking cares about motivation, Dave? Either the evidence contained in the actual text of the Pentateuch supports the DH, or it doesn't, and you have provided no argument as to why it does not.

Quote:
Here's a glimpse of how the DH advocates try to mutilate the text of the Pentateuch. This sample is taken from Genesis chapters 1-7. As you can see, the text is chopped up into bite-size pieces. In some places, sentences are cut in half and attributed to different sources. Why in the world would scholars come up with such a cockamamie theory? The Documentary Hypothesis is really nothing more than a conspiracy theory ... Jewish redactors supposedly cobbled together several documents and passed them off as the product of one author, Moses. How credible is that?
What the fuck are you talking about, Dave? All the DH is is an attempt to figure out why their are stylistic and conceptual differences in different parts of the Pentateuch. It attempts to figure out which parts were written by different authors, a belief you already espouse anyway!

I don't see anything remotely incredible about such a theory. I find your skepticism about it rather puzzling, though, since it is not very different from your own beliefs.


Quote:
LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT DEAN'S EVIDENCE FOR THE DH
Here's a graphic of how the Pentateuch supposedly came into existence. Time flows from top to bottom. As you can see, oral tradition is a major part of the theory although Dean tries to deny it. There is even an entire school of criticism known as the "Oral Traditionists" (Uppsala School). But all three schools -- Wellhausen with the DH, Gunkel and his Form Critics, and the Scandinvian Uppsla School all placed a great emphasis on Oral Tradition.
Dave, what you cannot be made to understand is that the DH does not depend on whether the original sources for the Pentateuch are oral or written. Individual proponents of the hypothesis may have their own beliefs one way or another, but those beliefs have nothing to do with the DH

Quote:
One major flaw in DH advocates' thinking is to apply Occidental thinking to Oriental text. If, however, one approaches the text in the most logical way -- that is, seeking to understand the Oriental mindset -- then the reasons for different names of God being used becomes clear. McDowell cites two Jewish scholars to explain the rules for using divine names (logical choices for analyzing Jewish text don't you think?) ... R. Jehuda Halevi in the 12th century and the 20th century scholar Umberto Cassuto of the Hebrew University. Cassuto's 7 rules are listed (p. 123) and explanation is also given for the use of the compound form "Yahweh-Elohim." These rules apply to certain types of literature in different ways and Cassuto explains this in detail (McDowell, p. 124).
And what are those rules, Dave? Why is it that passages relating the same events use different names for God, when they're written by different authors according to the DH? you've got the freaking book, Dave; are you incapable of paraphrasing the argument? Do you even understand the argument?

Cassuto concludes

Quote:
"there is no reason, therefore, to feel surprise that the use of these Names varies in the Torah. On the contrary, we should be surprised if they were not changed about. The position is of necessity what it is. It is not a case of disparity between different documents, or of mechanical amalgamation of separate texts; every Hebrew author was compelled to write thus and to use the two Names in this manner, because their primary signification, the general literary tradition of the ancient East, and the rules governing the use in the Divine Names throughout the entire range of Hebrew literature, demanded this." (McDowell, p. 126)
It's not just that they change about, Dave. It's that those changes coincide with other stylistic and conceptual changes. Guess which word I'm about to use, Dave? Consilience.

McDowell continues

Quote:
One of the major assumptions of the JEDP hypothesis is that the use of Jehovah is typical of a J document and Elohim of an E document. The combination of these two documents is the ground used by radical critics to account for the compound name Yahweh-Elohim. Cyrus Gordon cites his personal experience on the subject, "All this is admirably logical and for years I never questioned it. But my Ugaritic studies destroyed this kind of logic with relevant facts." 27/132 At Ugarit, deities were found with compound names. For example: Qadish-Amrar is the name of one and Ibb-Nikkal another ... Amon-Re, the most famous god with a compound name, was a deity that resulted from the Egyptian conquest under the 18th dynasty (McDowell, p. 126)
Again, missing the point. These different names for god can be cross-correlated with other textual and stylistic changes, and cannot be just assessed in isolation. This concept—consilience—is one you're never going to understand, and it cripples you intellectually.

At best, this is an alternative explanation for the different terminology; it in no way contradicts or disproves the DH.

Quote:
NATURE AND ROLE OF PRIESTS
Dean writes in summary ... Stop and think for a minute. If you want to have a theory that there is such a thing as a "P" source document and you take the liberty of chopping up text as Genesis is chopped up above, then OF COURSE you can support your theory. It's quite easy. Just select all the verses which talk about the Aaronic priests having access to God and Voila! ... you have it! "What a beautiful theory!" Rubbish!
That's your argument? Personal incredulity? But you're forgetting—again—that it's not just the nature and role of priests that associates passages with P. It's a combination of the attitude towards priests with other changes in text, variations in the Hebrew used, etc.
Quote:
No one would think of attempting this with any other historical text ... why with the Pentateuch?
Are you high, Dave? You don't think anyone has ever analyzed any other text before to try to figure out how many people writing at which points in history might be responsible for it?

You really need to get out more.

Quote:
Keep in mind also that there is not even the slightest hint of the existence of such a "P" document (or any of the others) in any ancient texts anywhere in the world.
Dave, this is idiotic. The evidence that such a "P" document exists is right there in the fucking Torah! You're looking at it. It's right there on the freaking page!

Quote:
But there are hints of the existence of written records kept by Adam and his descendants. In fact, they signed the documents they wrote with "these are the generations of ... " and we have independent confirmation from ancient Babylonian and Assyrian tablets that this "toledoth" was in common use.
No. These aren't remotely "hints" of the existence of written records kept by Adam etc. They're hints of the existence of records written by somebody. You've given us no reason whatsoever to suppose that somebody was Adam, or any other biblical patriarch.

Quote:
One thing I will say in favor of the DH (this is the only thing I can think of to say in its favor) ... It was necessary that someone realize that the Pentateuch was not the exclusive work of one author. The simplistic view that Moses wrote the entire Pentateuch himself is obviously wrong and a theory was needed. The problem is that the DH is the wrong theory, based upon wrong assumptions and entirely without any evidence whatsoever for the existence of it's putative source documents.
Dave, you have no idea why you think the DH is wrong, that's pretty clear. You don't understand it, you don't even understand where it differs from your own "hypothesis," and you've given not a single scrap of evidence that shows it's incorrect in its generality or in any of its specifics. This is the strong aroma of something you believe is incorrect without any understanding of what it even is, and of something you believe is incorrect for exclusively emotional reasons.

There is nothing in the DH that depends on the existence of its "putative source documents," but even if there were, that would hardly place it at a disadvantage compared to your "hypothesis," which depends crucially on the existence of documents for which you don't have the tiniest scrap of evidence.

For someone supposedly raised by a missionary, your grasp of biblical scholarship is astonishingly weak, Dave. I've seen nothing yet to make me think you know any more of it than I do, which is almost nothing.
ericmurphy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.