FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2006, 10:24 AM   #181
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by openlyatheist
the more likely a person is to be real, the less likely a religion based upon their worship will be able to spring up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver
I haven't seen that argument before, but I like it. I like it a lot.
I'm not so sure. Post-mortem cults have been formed to worship people who were most assuredly real, like the Emperor Augustus, in whose honor temples were built across the Roman Empire. Members of the Saint John Will-I-Am Coltrane African Orthodox Church in San Francisco believe that "A Love Supreme" is a divine revelation. And Haile Selassie, Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974, is worshipped as God incarnate by Rastafarians the world over.

This is in no way affects the possibility that Jesus was a mythical figure, but openlyatheist's "argument" does sound like a principle in search of falsifiability.

Didymus
Didymus is offline  
Old 05-08-2006, 04:29 PM   #182
Iasion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You've read The Holy Blood and Holy Grail,

you've seen the Da Vinci Code,

you've got the Jesus Christ Superstar T-shirt

but NOW -
(Twilight Zone music)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
THE JESI CONTINUUM

 
Old 05-08-2006, 05:53 PM   #183
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didymus
Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974, is worshipped as God incarnate by Rastafarians the world over.
So even if a Historical Jesus is found (one big if), then it is no more than a big Rastafarianism?
ChandraRama is offline  
Old 05-08-2006, 06:05 PM   #184
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 107
Default

after writing the above comment, I just went to Wikipedia to read about Rastafari.

What a comparison!

I can see how the Jesus movement started and became a cult and then a religion comparing with the Rastafari's historical and idelogical growth.
ChandraRama is offline  
Old 05-08-2006, 11:37 PM   #185
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myself
…the more likely a person is to be real, the less likely a religion based upon their worship will be able to spring up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didymus
I'm not so sure. Post-mortem cults have been formed to worship people who were most assuredly real, like the Emperor Augustus, in whose honor temples were built across the Roman Empire. Members of the Saint John Will-I-Am Coltrane African Orthodox Church in San Francisco believe that "A Love Supreme" is a divine revelation. And Haile Selassie, Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974, is worshipped as God incarnate by Rastafarians the world over.
Perhaps my quote above was too hasty. In my own post on page 7 I admitted that religions do "spring up" concerning the worship of real people, and Didymus’ post, reinforces that fact. Instead of "spring up" I should have written "endure long-term".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didymus
This is in no way affects the possibility that Jesus was a mythical figure, but openlyatheist's "argument" does sound like a principle in search of falsifiability.
Indeed. I think the real factors involved are those of lifespan of a religion vs. quality & quantity of the deified individual around which the religion is based. Roman Emperor based religions are extinct. Now we just have to see how long something like Rastafarianism can ride out it’s claims to a god incarnate. Only time will tell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChandraRama
I can see how the Jesus movement started and became a cult and then a religion comparing with the Rastafari's historical and idelogical growth.
What a double-edged sword it is for Christians:

For those that don’t believe that a religion can start w/out an historical founder, there are a myriad of world religions based on no apparently real people.

For those that don’t believe a religion can be based upon a non-divine person, there are examples like Rastafarianism.

Either is more probable to me that Christianity.

(Although, a lot of Rasta- seems like it’s mutated from Christianity anyway: Wikipedia: She claimed, in interviews, that she saw scars on the palms of Selassie's hands (as he waved to the crowd) that resembled the envisioned markings on Christ's hands from being nailed to the cross- )
openlyatheist is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 02:38 AM   #186
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPS
Based on Mark 6:3, some combination of James, Joseph, Judas and Simon.
In that case, why does Paul mention them seperately? Especially as your referenced Mark 6:3 states - and continues:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark 6:3-4
6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.
6:4 But Jesus, said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.
RPS: do you have a reference to show when the biological brothers of Jesus started to honour/follow him?

By the way, any news about what happened to his biological sisters?
post tenebras lux is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 04:37 AM   #187
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
THE JESI CONTINUUM
Can we do the football cards before we speak to Tom Hanks? Julia Roberts as Mary Magdalene?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:16 AM   #188
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
RPS: do you have a reference to show when the biological brothers of Jesus started to honour/follow him?
I'll let RPS carry his own water, but I'd like to ask: do you think Mk 6:4 could have been intended to undermine the authority of James and those of likeminded persuasion?

Cheers,

V.
Vivisector is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:19 AM   #189
RPS
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, California USA
Posts: 1,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
In that case, why does Paul mention them seperately?
My apologies, but I have no idea what you're asking here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
Especially as your referenced Mark 6:3 states - and continues:RPS: do you have a reference to show when the biological brothers of Jesus started to honour/follow him?
I don't think so. We know that James became a big cheese in the early Church though and many equate the Judas of the Mark text with Jude the apostle (St. Jude, the patron of lost causes).

Quote:
Originally Posted by post tenebras lux
By the way, any news about what happened to his biological sisters?
None that I'm aware of.
RPS is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 06:24 AM   #190
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisector
I'll let RPS carry his own water, but I'd like to ask: do you think Mk 6:4 could have been intended to undermine the authority of James and those of likeminded persuasion?

Cheers,

V.
Depends if we're working from the assumption that there was a real James in the first place.

I don't think that Jesus was the first literary hero to be ignored or ridiculed in his own home/town/land, so I'd just read it as being a bog standard literary device.
post tenebras lux is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.