outhouse

Understood.

But I believe his methodology is simular since his attacks are.




try and refute the fact jewish romans wrote in the deity as a jewish tax dodger. not attack the messenger.

spin

You wouldn't know what typical myther garbage was, if it strangled you in your waking stupor.

And incidentally, most people here with more than half a brain could tell you I'm not a myther. But you were born yesterday and only know how to talk talk, sadly, contentless banalities.

That you need to learn to reserve judgment until you know something more than you say.

When you feel like communicating, please don't be hesitant.

There are two reasons to crap on about the scholarly community rather than evidence for your views: a) you have no evidence or b) you're part of the community. Clearly #b is not the case.

The thing that's worse than talking nonsense is trying to do so aggressively.

As you don't seem to know what the term "minimalist" means, perhaps you should read the views of someone who has worn the label more than nearly anyone in the field, Thomas L. Thompson, to get an idea of the term. He would wean you out of your complacency. But you're not up to that. And I don't know what orafice you plucked your percentages from but they have as much meaning as most of the percentages I've seen spouted here: none.

outhouse

and if you look at the words originally written, you would see he is talking about a awakening, a feeling from within.


You also ignore the fact he talks about the real apostles, and its evident in his letters that he wants to be seen as a real apostle very badly. He wants to identify with a movement already in progress.

outhouse

blah blah, blah, blah blah,

again with no substance or rebuttal.

outhouse

actually I do, I understand the OT debate quite well.

In this context, it has to do with how much of the gospel is errant.


I'd be glad to spell more out for you, if needed

Toto

I don't think you do

Because they are using standard historical analysis and logic?


What facts are you talking about? What facts make Jesus a tax dodger, when the gospels have him advocating paying taxes? Who are these Jewish Romans?

What are your sources?

Does your computer have a shift key?

outhouse

You have not yet been able to find one statement that is nonsense.

im following Meyers, Green, Crosson, Ehrman, Carrier ect ect ect i'm sorry spin isnt on that list

outhouse

really , LOL



"They began to accuse him, saying, "We found this man perverting the nation, forbidding paying taxes to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king." - Luke 23:2


And jesus never payed the tax when asked about render to caesar, he sent peter fishing instead and never pulled coin's from his purse to pay.



Paul is a jewish roman

Pauls targets were the god fearer's. romans who worshipped in synagogues but were not jews.

the gospel authors were jewish romans with the exception of GMatthew who still used the roman foundation but wrote to a more jewish audience.


the fact that the gospel writers wrote jesus in as a tax dodger and a person who was killed for money.


these were jesus enemy, and its the only version we have left.



cross cultural theology

outhouse

now quick attack the messenger due to ignorance on the topic.

outhouse

Jews is to broad a brush. with 4 distinct groups


"IF" jesus was a tax dodger, then it would affect the Saducees as they ran the temple which was the treasury.

jesus preaching to worship at home and stay out of he roman infected temple would be enough to warrant a capitol offense to ruthless people who killed for much less.