![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2001 
				Location: Birmingham, Alabama 
				
				
					Posts: 4,109
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I was wondering if any scholars have ever tried to draw any connections between these two ancient myths.  On the one hand they seem to take place during the same time frame (~ 1200 BC).  They are both sort of founding national myths that involve great leaders who make years long journeys to their traditional homelands.  On the other hand, one is about travelling through a desert and the other through an ocean (although that may be a similarity).  One involves a huge nation travelling and the other a small group of followers.  The starting points and ending points are different and the individual stories along the way are different. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Both seem to have originally been told in verse and then later written down (again, roughly around the same time frame (~700 BC). so I wondered if it was possible if one had influenced the other and whether any biblical or other ancient scholars had studied them in more detail to see if there was any indication of a relationship. thanks! SLD  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			lecture on Homer  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I think one difference is that the Exodus is presented as having major consequences, as the account of how the nation of Israel came into being.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Although the final return of Odysseus is a happy ending for him and his family it does not seem to have much wider consequences. When Virgil rewrote the Illiad and Odyssey as the Aeneid he made the wanderings of Aeneas have major significance. They lead to the founding of the Roman state. It is that sort of significance of the Journey that the Exodus has but the Odyssey lacks. Andrew Criddle  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2002 
				Location: N/A 
				
				
					Posts: 4,370
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 All the best, Roger Pearse  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2005 
				Location: San Bernardino, Calif. 
				
				
					Posts: 5,435
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2005 
				Location: San Bernardino, Calif. 
				
				
					Posts: 5,435
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Possible? Sure.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	But I would strongly advise resisting the urge to model your theorizing on the example of apologists who are fond of inferring "probably was" from any "could have been" that they can think of.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: London UK 
				
				
					Posts: 16,024
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 As the Jews were clearly indigenous, I think it is clear they made up a national history when in exile by the rivers of Babylon, using existing and very common epic themes. I wonder if they were actually moaning about the Babylonians....  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |