FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-2007, 12:51 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post


By the way, very few NT scholars who deal with Matt 1-2//Lk 1-2 speak of a virgin birth. They speak of a virginal conception.

Jeffrey
Is this is similar to the Mormon view, in which Heavenly father actually tags that ass?
dog-on is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 04:25 AM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post


By the way, very few NT scholars who deal with Matt 1-2//Lk 1-2 speak of a virgin birth. They speak of a virginal conception.

Jeffrey
Is this is similar to the Mormon view, in which Heavenly father actually tags that ass?
Maybe he means Joseph "broke off a piece a dat" after the angel got to her.
Dogfish is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 10:06 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Will the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury do? I would define them as xian scholars? And virgin birth is surely a result of a virgin conception is it not?
"virgin birth" is potentially confusing because it could refer to the teaching in some Christian traditions that Mary was still physically a virgin after the birth of Jesus.

"virginal conception" avoids this issue.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 10:41 AM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Will the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury do? I would define them as xian scholars? And virgin birth is surely a result of a virgin conception is it not?
"virgin birth" is potentially confusing because it could refer to the teaching in some Christian traditions that Mary was still physically a virgin after the birth of Jesus.

"virginal conception" avoids this issue.

Andrew Criddle
That sounds reasonable but is it not actually digging a deeper hole? The idea of continuing virginity is related to ideas that if a woman is to give birth to a god she must also be like a god - leading to a whole huge area of doctrines like mother of god and immaculate conception of Mary. The alleged solution of virginal conception is not actually a solution - it is only trying to make something that is completely unreal look a little less unreal...

And I would rather we looked at the comment from the CofE website I quoted above and my interpretation of this that:

Quote:
Stating Jesus is historical is in fact a statement of faith
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.