![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#71 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: U.S. 
				
				
					Posts: 1,398
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 well one wonders if the current understanding of the "isolation" and "independant development" of south American culture can be defended. I suppose more research has to be done on this account, and indeed it would be exciting if in fact there was trade. I think there was a huge controversy in the archeological world when a statue of a Goddess was found holding what looked like corn was found in southern India. Corn is obviously native to the Americas and not to India...there have been several people questioning that. However would it be the Chinese or the Hindus who have as a part of their culture the concepts of the "cycles of ages" which they have in common with the Mayans as well as the concept of the zero, which was developed with supposed independence in both cultures.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#72 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: U.S. 
				
				
					Posts: 1,398
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Incorrect...if you say"indoeuropeans" you are talking about the same group of birds who have the same hairstyles... :thumbs:  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#73 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2003 
				Location: London UK 
				
				
					Posts: 16,024
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			North American History  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	See 1405 on this page. Is there or is there not a wreck of a fifteenth century Chinese Junk in the Sacramento River California - pre Columbus?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#74 | ||
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#75 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 The most important comment is that Zarmanochegas, i.e. ,shramanacharyas probably indicates that the philosopher involved was a Vaishnavite Hindu and not a Buddhist. Andrew Criddle  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#76 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: U.S. 
				
				
					Posts: 1,398
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 ![]() shaman Look up shaman at Dictionary.com 1698, "priest of the Ural-Altaic peoples," probably via Ger. Schamane, from Rus. shaman, from Tungus shaman, which is perhaps from Chinese sha men "Buddhist monk," from Prakrit samaya-, from Skt. sramana-s "Buddhist ascetic." oh yes...I forgot, so now your argument is that Hindus reached Europe but not the Buddhists?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#77 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Birmingham UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,876
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 In later Buddhism particularly Tantric influenced forms Acharya becomes much more prominent as a title. Quote: 
	
 Andrew Criddle  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#78 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: U.S. 
				
				
					Posts: 1,398
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |