FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2009, 09:10 AM   #201
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post

Quote:
4They were talking with each other about everything that had happened. 15As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; 16but they were kept from recognizing him.
Seems someone already though of that...
The passage in the NT is most laughable. How can non-recognotion be regarded as evidence of seeing Jesus.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:03 AM   #202
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: big bad Deetroit
Posts: 2,850
Default

aa5874 wrote:But, a supernatural god-man did not exist in the first century. People living in the 1st century in Judaea, between 15th year of the reign of Tiberius and the death of Nero, would have immediately known that the writer Paul was writing fiction.
__________________________________________________ __

I don't know if anyone has quoted this site. I think it has interesting information some of which I have seen elsewhere.

http://www.geocities.com/inquisitive79/refute5.html

Especially starting with the paragraph that begins
"... Secondly, the idea arose that Jesus had been executed on the eve of Passover..."
sbaii is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 12:54 PM   #203
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Secondly, the idea arose that Jesus had been executed on the eve of Passover. This belief is apparently based on Yeishu's execution. Passover occurs at the time of the Vernal Equinox, an event considered important by astrologers during the Roman Empire. The astrologers thought of this time as the time of the crossing of two astrological celestial circles, and this event was symbolized by a cross. Thus there was a belief that Jesus had died on "the cross." The misunderstanding of this term by those who were not initiated into the astrological cults, was another factor contributing to the belief that Jesus was crucified. In one of the earliest Christian documents (the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) there is no mention of Jesus being crucified yet the sign of a cross in the sky is used to represent Jesus's coming. It should be noted that the center of astrological superstition in the Roman Empire was the city of Tarsus in Asia Minor - the place where the legendary missionary Paul came from. The idea that a special star had heralded the birth of Jesus, and that a solar eclipse occurred at his death, is typical of Tarsian astrological superstition.
Interesting, plausible even, but one would like some references.

This appears to be from a copy of "REFUTING MISSIONARIES" by "Hayyim ben Yehoshua."
Toto is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:59 PM   #204
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

References would be nice, but very interesting reading nevertheless.
angelo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.