![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
|
![]()
I would suggest that a great deal of what we know, or think we know, comes not from our own experiences but from the experience and knowledge of others. Is reading that Antarctica is cold as hell the same as experiencing it? No. But I still believe it’s true.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, reading about being cold is different than experiencing the cold is different than remembering the cold. But just cuz all these experiences of cold are not identical experiences does not mean that they are not all experiences. With that kind of sloppy thinking, next you will argue that my brother isn’t my brother because he isn’t my identical-twin brother. Geez, Albert the Traditional Catholic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Required
Posts: 2,349
|
![]() Quote:
So while you can experience other's account of being drunk on wine, you will not know what it means to be drunk, unless you become drunk, and then you will only know what it means for you to get drunk You must be your experience in order to know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
|
![]() Quote:
Technically speaking, everything is an experience, even being in a coma. But reading or hearing about something is hardly the same as directly experiencing it. Bye now, and give my best to your brother. Howard, the Traditional non-Traditionalist |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,949
|
![]()
All right, folks. I don't see much EoG content here, or even much content at all. Unless the OP writer can explain how this is at all relevant to EoG, and maybe present some sort of argument in that vein, this is ~E~bound...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Required
Posts: 2,349
|
![]()
If the rationale of the OP is correct;
If anyone claims they know God: To know God is to be God So if you wanna experience what God is, you must become God To know what Life is, you must be life To know Reality, you must be reality To know is to be And no one can do this for you, you have to do this on your own A small question: Do you know your self? To know your self, all of the unconscious parts must become conscious Otherwise, you would only know part of your self What is life worth if you don't know who lives it? What is knowledge worth if you don't know who knows? |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,949
|
![]() Quote:
![]() So, Darth, if I wanted to know what you were talking about, would I have to be you, or would I have to 'be' what you are talking about? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Required
Posts: 2,349
|
![]() Quote:
If I am talking about a flower, you would have to be a flower to know if what I say about the flower is true, you don't have to be me, unless of course if you wanna 'know' me! If I talk about me, then of course you would have to be me If I said a wine tastes like X, then it is a question of how you define x If I say sweet, you may say sour, the wine doesn't change because of this, the wine is what the wine is |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|